Pearson CISM New Attempt

The primary purpose for continuous monitoring of security controls is to ensure the effectiveness of controls. This involves regularly assessing the controls to ensure that they are meeting their intended objectives, and that any potential weaknesses are identified and addressed. Continuous monitoring also helps to ensure that control gaps are minimized, and that systems are available and aligned with compliance requirements.

The primary purpose of continuous monitoring of security controls is to ensure that the controls are operating effectively and providing adequate protection for the information assets. Continuous monitoring can also help to identify control gaps, ensure system availability, and support compliance requirements, but these are secondary benefits12 References = 1: SP 800-137, Information Security Continuous Monitoring (ISCM) for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, page 1-12: A Practical Approach to Continuous Control Monitoring, ISACA Journal, Volume 2, 2015, page 1.

 An information security policy is the MOST helpful for aligning security operations with the IT governance framework because it defines the security objectives, principles, standards, and guidelines that guide the security operations activities and processes. An information security policy also establishes the roles and responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities, and reporting and communication mechanisms for security operations. An information security policy should be aligned with the IT governance framework, which provides the direction, structure, and oversight for the effective management and delivery of IT services and resources. An information security policy should also be consistent with the enterprise governance framework, which sets the vision, mission, values, and goals of the organization12. A security risk assessment (A) is helpful for identifying and evaluating the security risks that may affect the security operations and the IT governance framework, but it is not the MOST helpful for aligning them. A security risk assessment should be based on the information security policy, which defines the risk appetite, tolerance, and criteria for the organization12. A security operations program (B) is helpful for implementing and executing the security operations activities and processes that support the IT governance framework, but it is not the MOST helpful for aligning them. A security operations program should be derived from the information security policy, which provides the strategic direction and guidance for the security operations12. A business impact analysis (BIA) (D) is helpful for determining the criticality and priority of the business processes and functions that depend on the security operations and the IT governance framework, but it is not the MOST helpful for aligning them. A BIA should be conducted in accordance with the information security policy, which specifies the business continuity and disaster recovery requirements and objectives for the organization12. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 75-76, 81-82, 88-89, 93-941; 2: CISM Domain 1: Information Security Governance (ISG) [2022 update]2

 Improving security controls is an example of risk mitigation, which is the process of reducing the likelihood or impact of a risk. Risk mitigation can be achieved by implementing various strategies, such as purchasing insurance, discontinuing the activity associated with the risk, or improving security controls. Purchasing insurance is a form of risk transfer, which is the process of shifting the responsibility or burden of a risk to another party. Discontinuing the activity associated with the risk is a form of risk avoidance, which is the process of eliminating or avoiding a potential source of harm. Performing a cost-benefit analysis is a form of risk evaluation, which is the process of assessing the costs and benefits of different options to manage a risk. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1741; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 802

Assessing the consequences of noncompliance is the next step that should be done after determining that there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard. The information security manager should evaluate the potential impact and exposure of the organization due to the noncompliance with the security standard. The assessment should consider the legal, regulatory, contractual, and reputational implications of the noncompliance, as well as the likelihood and severity of the incidents or penalties that may result from the noncompliance. The assessment should also compare the cost and benefit of complying with the security standard versus accepting the risk of noncompliance. The assessment should provide the basis for making informed and rational decisions about how to address the noncompliance issue and prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve compliance. Documenting risk acceptances, revising the organization’s security policy, and conducting an information security audit are all possible actions that may be taken to address the noncompliance issue, but they are not the next steps that should be done. These actions should be performed after assessing the consequences of noncompliance, and based on the results and recommendations of the assessment. Documenting risk acceptances may be appropriate if the organization decides to accept the risk of noncompliance, and if the risk is within the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization. Revising the organization’s security policy may be necessary if the organization decides to comply with the security standard, and if the policy needs to be updated to reflect the new requirements and expectations. Conducting an information security audit may be useful if the organization wants to verify the level of compliance and identify the gaps and weaknesses in the security controls and processes. Therefore, assessing the consequences of noncompliance is the next step that should be done after determining that there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard, as it helps the information security manager to understand the risk and impact of the noncompliance and to make informed and rational decisions about how to address it. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 43 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2