CISM Questions Bank

The primary responsibility of an information security manager in an organization that is implementing the use of company-owned mobile devices in its operations is to review and update existing security policies. Security policies are the foundation of an organi-zation’s security program, as they define the goals, objectives, principles, roles, respon-sibilities, and requirements for protecting information and systems. Security policies should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in the organization’s envi-ronment, needs, risks, and technologies1. Implementing the use of company-owned mobile devices in its operations is a significant change that may introduce new threats and vulnerabilities, as well as new opportunities and benefits, for the organiza-tion. Therefore, the information security manager should review and update existing security policies to address the following aspects2:

•The scope, purpose, and ownership of company-owned mobile devices

•The acceptable and unacceptable use of company-owned mobile devices

•The security standards and best practices for company-owned mobile devices

•The roles and responsibilities of users, managers, IT staff, and vendors regarding compa-ny-owned mobile devices

•The procedures for provisioning, managing, monitoring, and decommissioning company-owned mobile devices

•The incident response and reporting process for company-owned mobile devices

By reviewing and updating existing security policies, the information security manager can ensure that the organization’s security program is aligned with its business objec-tives and risk appetite, as well as compliant with applicable laws and regulations. The other options are not the primary responsibility of an information security manager in an organization that is implementing the use of company-owned mobile devices in its operations. They are possible actions or controls that may be derived from or support-ed by the updated security policies. Requiring remote wipe capabilities for devices is a technical control that can help prevent data loss or theft in case of device loss or com-promise3. Conducting security awareness training is an administrative control that can help educate users about the security risks and responsibilities associated with using company-owned mobile devices. Enforcing passwords and data encryption on the de-vices is a technical control that can help protect data confidentiality and integrity on company-owned mobile devices. References: 1: Information Security Policy - NIST 2: Mobile Device Security Policy - SANS 3: Remote Wipe: What It Is & How It Works - Lifewire : Security Awareness Training - NIST : Mobile Device Encryption - NIST

= Establishing an information security strategy committee is the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program because it involves the participation and collaboration of key stakeholders from different business functions and levels who can provide input, guidance, and endorsement for the security program. An information security strategy committee is a governance body that oversees the development, implementation, and maintenance of the security program and aligns it with the organization’s strategic objectives, risk appetite, and culture. An information security strategy committee can help to obtain support for the security program by:

Communicating the vision, mission, and goals of the security program to the organization and demonstrating its value and benefits.

Establishing roles and responsibilities for the security program and ensuring accountability and ownership.

Securing adequate resources and budget for the security program and allocating them appropriately.

Resolving conflicts and issues that may arise during the security program execution and ensuring alignment with other business processes and initiatives.

Monitoring and evaluating the performance and effectiveness of the security program and ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation.

Benchmarking against similar industry organizations is a useful technique to compare and improve the security program, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. Benchmarking involves measuring and analyzing the security program’s processes, practices, and outcomes against those of other organizations that have similar characteristics, objectives, or challenges. Benchmarking can help to identify gaps, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the security program and to adopt best practices and standards that can enhance the security program’s performance and maturity. However, benchmarking alone does not guarantee the support or acceptance of the security program by the organization, as it may not reflect the organization’s specific needs, risks, or culture.

Delivering an information security awareness campaign is a vital component of the security program, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. An information security awareness campaign is a set of activities and initiatives that aim to educate and inform the organization’s workforce and other relevant parties about the security program’s policies, standards, procedures, and guidelines, as well as the security risks, threats, and incidents that may affect the organization. An information security awareness campaign can help to increase the security knowledge, skills, and behaviors of the organization’s members and to foster a security risk-aware culture. However, an information security awareness campaign is not sufficient to obtain support for the security program, as it may not address the strategic, operational, or financial aspects of the security program or the expectations and interests of the different stakeholders.

Publishing an information security RACI chart is a helpful tool to define and communicate the security program’s roles and responsibilities, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. A RACI chart is a matrix that assigns the level of involvement and accountability for each task or activity in the security program to each role or stakeholder. RACI stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed, which are the four possible levels of participation. A RACI chart can help to clarify the expectations, obligations, and authority of each role or stakeholder in the security program and to avoid duplication, confusion, or conflict. However, a RACI chart does not ensure the support or commitment of the roles or stakeholders for the security program, as it may not address the benefits, challenges, or resources of the security program or the feedback and input of the roles or stakeholders. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 97-98, 103-104, 107-108, 111-112

Information Security Governance: Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management, 2nd Edition - ISACA1

Information Security Strategy: The Key to Success - ISACA2

Deliver an information security awareness campaign is the BEST approach to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. An information security awareness campaign is a great way to raise awareness of the importance of information security and the impact it can have on an organization. It helps to ensure that all stakeholders understand the importance of information security and are aware of the risks associated with it. Additionally, an effective awareness campaign can help to ensure that everyone in the organization is aware of the cybersecurity policies, procedures, and best practices that must be followed.

Email software packages that provide native encryption of messages use proprietary algorithms and formats that are not compatible with other email software packages. This means that the encryption cannot interoperate across product domains, and the recipients of encrypted messages must use the same email software package as the sender to decrypt and read the messages. This limits the usability and scalability of native encryption, and may also pose security risks if the encryption algorithms or formats are not well-tested or widely accepted. A common drawback of email software packages that provide native encryption of messages is that the encryption cannot interoperate across product domains1234. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 206. The Top 10 Email Encryption Solutions In 2023 - Expert Insights2, The Best Email Encryption Services for 2023 | PCMag3, The Top 12 Email Encryption Services for 2023 - Right Inbox4.

A common drawback of email software packages that provide native encryption of messages is that the encryption cannot interoperate across product domains. This means that emails sent from one product cannot be read by another product, as the encryption keys used are not compatible. This can be a problem when sending emails to people who use different software packages, as the encrypted emails cannot be read.