CompTIA CAS-004 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The code snippet presents a buffer size risk where the user input (username) is accepted without limiting the number of characters, potentially leading to buffer overflow vulnerabilities. The best solution is to implement input validation that limits the input to a maximum of 20 characters, matching the buffer size defined in the code. This prevents overflow attacks by ensuring that user input does not exceed the allocated memory space. Other options, like adding more parameters or allowing alphanumeric characters, do not directly address the root cause of buffer overflow vulnerabilities. CASP+ stresses the importance of proper input validation and bounds checking as critical security measures.

References:

CASP+ CAS-004 Exam Objectives: Domain 2.0 – Enterprise Security Operations (Input Validation and Buffer Overflow Prevention)

CompTIA CASP+ Study Guide: Secure Coding Practices and Input Validation Techniques

The process ID 87 can be the starting point for an investigation of a possible buffer overflow attack, as it shows a high percentage of CPU utilization (99.7%) and a suspicious command name (graphic.linux_randomization.prg). A buffer overflow attack is a type of attack that exploits a vulnerability in an application or system that allows an attacker to write data beyond the allocated buffer size, potentially overwriting memory segments and executing malicious code. A high CPU utilization could indicate that the process is performing intensive or abnormal operations, such as a buffer overflow attack. A suspicious command name could indicate that the process is trying to disguise itself or evade detection, such as by mimicking a legitimate program or using random characters. The other process IDs do not show signs of a buffer overflow attack, as they have low CPU utilization and normal command names. Verified References: