Isaca Certification CISM Full Course Free

 Increasing accountability is the primary reason for ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities are communicated to users who have been granted administrative privileges due to specific application requirements. Administrative privileges grant users the ability to perform actions that can affect the security, availability and integrity of the application or system, such as installing software, modifying configurations, accessing sensitive data or granting access to other users. Therefore, users who have administrative privileges must be aware of their roles and responsibilities and the consequences of their actions. Communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities to these users helps to establish accountability by setting expectations, defining boundaries, assigning ownership and enabling monitoring and reporting. Accountability also helps to deter misuse or abuse of privileges, ensure compliance with policies and standards, and facilitate incident response and investigation.

Clearer segregation of duties is a benefit of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. Segregation of duties is a control that aims to prevent or detect conflicts of interest, errors, fraud or unauthorized activities by separating different functions or tasks among different users or groups. For example, a user who can create a purchase order should not be able to approve it. Segregation of duties helps to reduce the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate actions by requiring more than one person to complete a critical or sensitive process. However, segregation of duties alone does not ensure accountability, as users may still act in collusion or circumvent the control.

Increased user productivity is a possible outcome of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. User productivity refers to the efficiency and effectiveness of users in performing their tasks and achieving their goals. By communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities, users may have a better understanding of their tasks, expectations and performance indicators, which may help them to work faster, smarter and better. However, user productivity is not directly related to the security risk of granting administrative privileges, and it may also depend on other factors, such as user skills, motivation, tools and resources.

Fewer security incidents is a desired result of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. Security incidents are events or situations that compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information assets or systems. By communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities, users may be more aware of the security implications of their actions and the potential threats and vulnerabilities they may face, which may help them to avoid or prevent security incidents. However, fewer security incidents is not a guarantee or a measure of accountability, as users may still cause or experience security incidents due to human error, negligence, malicious intent or external factors. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 144

Effective User Access Reviews - ISACA1

CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA2

Communicating the residual risk is the best way to facilitate an information security manager’s efforts to obtain senior management commitment for an information security program. The residual risk is the level of risk that remains after applying the security controls and mitigation measures. The residual risk reflects the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security program, as well as the potential impact and exposure of the organization. The information security manager should communicate the residual risk to the senior management in a clear, concise, and relevant manner, using quantitative or qualitative methods, such as risk matrices, heat maps, dashboards, or reports. The communication of the residual risk should also include the comparison with the inherent risk, which is the level of risk before applying any security controls, and the risk appetite, which is the level of risk that the organization is willing to accept. The communication of the residual risk should help the senior management to understand the value and performance of the information security program, as well as the need and justification for further investment or improvement. Presenting evidence of inherent risk, reporting the security maturity level, and presenting compliance requirements are all important aspects of the information security program, but they are not the best ways to obtain senior management commitment. These aspects may not directly demonstrate the benefits or outcomes of the information security program, or they may not align with the business objectives or priorities of the organization. For example, presenting evidence of inherent risk may show the potential threats and vulnerabilities that the organization faces, but it may not indicate how the information security program addresses or reduces them. Reporting the security maturity level may show the progress and status of the information security program, but it may not relate to the risk level or the business impact. Presenting compliance requirements may show the legal or regulatory obligations that the organization must fulfill, but it may not reflect the actual security needs or goals of the organization. Therefore, communicating the residual risk is the best way to obtain senior management commitment for an information security program, as it shows the results and value of the information security program for the organization. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 41 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

 The needs of the organization define the triggers within a business continuity plan (BCP). Triggers are the events or conditions that initiate the activation of the BCP. The triggers should be based on the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, recovery time objectives, and recovery point objectives. The triggers should also be aligned with the organization’s information security policy, disaster recovery plan, and gap analysis. However, these are not the primary factors that define the triggers, but rather the supporting elements that help implement the BCP. The needs of the organization are the main drivers for determining the triggers, as they reflect the organization’s priorities, expectations, and requirements for business continuity. References =

CISM Review Manual (Digital Version) 1, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, pages 191-192, 195-196, 199-200.

Business Continuity Management Guideline 2, page 5, Section 4.2.1: Triggers

Business Continuity Plan - Open Risk Manual 3, page 1, Section 1: Introduction

= The PRIMARY objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident, which is the underlying factor or condition that enabled the incident to occur. Identifying the root cause helps to prevent or mitigate future incidents, as well as to improve the incident response process. Re-evaluating the impact of incidents, identifying vulnerabilities, and identifying control improvements are secondary objectives of a post-incident review, which are derived from the root cause analysis. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3061; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1512

The primary objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident. After an incident has occurred, the post-incident review process involves gathering and analyzing evidence to determine the cause of the incident. This analysis will help to identify both the underlying vulnerability that allowed the incident to occur, as well as any control improvements that should be implemented to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Additionally, the post-incident review process can also be used to re-evaluate the impact of the incident, as well as any potential implications for the organization.