Full Access IIBA CBAP Tutorials

The HAZOP technique, which stands for Hazard and Operability Study, is a qualitative technique that involves a disciplined analysis of the event sequences that could transform a potential hazard into an accident. The HAZOP technique is a systematic and structured method of identifying and evaluating the possible deviations from the intended design, operation, or functionality of a system, process, or product. The HAZOP technique uses a set of guide words, such as no, more, less, as well as, part of, and reverse, to generate different scenarios of what could go wrong and why. The HAZOP technique helps to identify the causes, consequences, and safeguards of the deviations, and to recommend the appropriate actions or controls to prevent or mitigate the hazards12. A failure mode and effects criticality analysis (FMECA) is a qualitative technique that involves an extension of the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) by adding a criticality rating to each failure mode. A FMECA is a method of identifying and evaluating the potential failures of a system, process, or product, and their impacts on the performance, safety, or reliability of the system, process, or product. A FMECA helps to prioritize the failures based on their severity and frequency, and to determine the corrective actions or preventive measures to reduce or eliminate the failures13. A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a qualitative technique that involves a systematic analysis of the potential failures of a system, process, or product, and their effects on the performance, safety, or reliability of the system, process, or product. An FMEA is a method of identifying and evaluating the causes, modes, and consequences of the failures, and the existing or planned controls to detect or prevent the failures. An FMEA helps to improve the design, operation, or functionality of the system, process, or product, and to reduce the risk of failures14. A preliminary risk analysis (PRA) is a qualitative technique that involves a high-level assessment of the risks that may affect a project or a solution. A PRA is a method of identifying and evaluating the sources, events, and impacts of the risks, and the existing or planned responses to the risks. A PRA helps to determine the feasibility and viability of the project or the solution, and to establish the scope and objectives of the risk management process15. References:

• CBAP® Handbook
• HAZOP Technique - iiba.org
• Failure Mode and Effects Criticality Analysis - iiba.org
• Failure Mode and Effects Analysis - iiba.org
• Preliminary Risk Analysis - iiba.org

Focus groups are directed conversations for gathering ideas, opinions, and attitudes about a product, service, problem, or opportunity. Focus groups are a type of elicitation technique that involves bringing together a group of selected stakeholders, usually potential or actual users or customers, and facilitating a structured discussion on a specific topic. Focus groups help to explore the needs, expectations, preferences, and perceptions of the stakeholders, as well as to generate new ideas or solutions. Focus groups also help to identify the commonalities and differences among the stakeholders, as well as the risks and opportunities related to the product, service, problem, or opportunity. References: IIBA BABOK Guide v3, section 4.2.4, page 114; CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, chapter 4, page 176; CBAP Exam Questions - Institute i4, question 244.

The next task that the BA needs to do to complete the gap analysis is to define the future state capabilities. This means that the BA needs to describe the desired outcomes, benefits, and functions of the new systems and how they will support the business needs and stakeholder requirements. Defining the future state capabilities will help the BA to compare them with the current state of systems and identify the gaps, opportunities, and changes needed to achieve the future state. Identifying performance measures, categorizing risk factors, or selecting the stakeholder engagement approach are not the next tasks for completing the gap analysis, because they are either part of the current state analysis or the subsequent tasks after the gap analysis. References:

• CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 6: Strategy Analysis, page 254
• Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK) Guide, Version 3, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, section 5.3: Define Future State, page 99
• Business Analysis Professional Resources, IIBA Resource Collection, Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK) Guide
• CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Skillsoft Book, Chapter 6: Strategy Analysis, page 254

Ad images are a strong candidate to be addressed while planning for requirements reuse, because they are likely to change frequently and have common elements that can be reused across different weeks. Requirements reuse is a technique that involves identifying, storing, and reusing requirements or requirement components for future projects or initiatives. It can help to reduce duplication, improve consistency, and save time and effort. Ad images can benefit from requirements reuse, because they can use a standard template, format, and style, and only change the specific image and text for each new topping. Dough preparation, toppings preparation, and topping recipes are not good candidates for requirements reuse, because they are either stable or unique for each week. References:

• CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 3: Requirements Life Cycle Management, page 124
• Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK) Guide, Version 3, Chapter 3: Requirements Life Cycle Management, section 3.7: Reuse Requirements, page 66
• Business Analysis Professional Resources, IIBA Resource Collection, Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK) Guide
• CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Skillsoft Book, Chapter 3: Requirements Life Cycle Management, page 124