Free and Premium PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Dumps Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Stratified sampling is the best method when the population consists of different groups or categories. In this case:

ME has two areas of operations (electrical and mechanical services).

Complaints were collected separately for each area.

By choosing representative samples from each category (electrical & mechanical complaints), Li Na ensured a balanced approach.

Systematic sampling selects samples at fixed intervals, which does not ensure proportional representation of both groups.

Block selection sampling is used when focusing on a specific time period or section, which does not apply here.

Thus, stratified sampling (B) is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

One of the seven quality management principles in ISO 9001:2015 is Improvement, which emphasizes continual enhancement of processes, products, and services.

Clause 10.3 (Continual Improvement) states that organizations must continuously assess risks, consequences, and impacts to improve their QMS.

Risk-based thinking (Clause 0.3.3) supports improvement by identifying and mitigating risks before they affect performance.

Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities) requires organizations to take a proactive approach, ensuring long-term success.

Other options do not fully align with the question:

Process approach (A) focuses on managing interrelated activities.

Leadership (B) ensures commitment but does not directly address risk assessment.

Relationship management (D) deals with interested parties, not risk mitigation.

Nonconformity report

ISO 9001 Clause Number: 8.5.4 Nature of problem: Cleaning and sanitising records are not available for every batch. ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled: ISO 9001 - “The organization shall implement planned arrangements, at appropriate stages, to verify that the product requirements have been met.” Evidence: 40 cleaning records are available for 63 batches.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 5.2.1 (Establishing the Quality Policy) states that top management must establish, implement, and maintain a quality policy.

In the scenario, the quality manager (Leslie) created the policy, but top management did not establish it themselves, which violates Clause 5.2.1. While the policy can be drafted by a team, top management must take full ownership of its development and approval.

The key expected results of a quality management system that conforms to the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 are stated in clause 0.1 of the standard, which says: “The adoption of a quality management system is a strategic decision for an organization that can help to improve its overall performance and provide a sound basis for sustainable development initiatives. The potential benefits to an organization of implementing a quality management system based on this International Standard are: a) the ability to consistently provide products and services that meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements; b) facilitating opportunities to enhance customer satisfaction; c) addressing risks and opportunities associated with its context and objectives; d) the ability to demonstrate conformity to specified quality management system requirements.” Therefore, the two options that best match these benefits are A and E, as they directly relate to providing products and services that meet customer requirements and enhancing customer satisfaction. The other options are not explicitly mentioned as key expected results, although they may be possible outcomes of implementing a quality management system. References: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements, Key Elements of an ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System, What is ISO 9001 2015 as a Quality Management Systems?

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.8 (Audit Reporting):

The certification body retains ownership of the audit report as it is responsible for the certification decision.

The auditee may receive a copy, but it does not own the report.

The audit team leader compiles the report but does not own it.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

A Stage 1 audit is a preliminary assessment to evaluate the readiness of the organisation for the Stage 2 certification audit. The audit scope is defined by the audit client and the certification body based on the application and the contract. If the organisation wants to include a new work area that was not part of the original scope, the auditor should advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures, such as submitting a formal request, providing relevant information, and paying additional fees. The auditor should also suggest that the Quality Manager will advise the programme manager, who is responsible for managing the audit programme, that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area. The programme manager will then decide whether to approve or reject the request, and communicate the decision to the auditor and the Quality Manager. The auditor should not proceed with the audit of the new work area without the approval of the programme manager and the confirmation of the audit scope. 1234 References:

1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

2: ISO 9001 Certification Audits | Stage 1 and Stage 2 - 9001. Simplified

3: What is the difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Audits? - ISO Update

4: Getting Certified to ISO 9001 - the Stage 1 Audit

The auditor could raise the following nonconformities to ISO 9001 based on the scenario:

•Option A: 10.3 - The organisation did not continuously improve. Reject rates were unchanged. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.3 requires the organization to improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system. The organization did not demonstrate any improvement in reducing the reject rate of the finished product, which was a stated objective of top management. The corrective action taken by the organization was not effective in addressing the root cause of the problem and preventing its recurrence.

•Option B: 7.1.4 - The factory environment is not suitably maintained to prevent dirty products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.4 requires the organization to determine, provide and maintain the environment necessary for the operation of its processes and to achieve conformity of products and services. The organization did not ensure that the factory floor was clean and dry, which affected the quality of the products and increased the risk of nonconformity.

•Option C: 7.1.1 - The organization failed to provide the required resources to prevent nonconforming products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.1 requires the organization to determine and provide the resources needed for the establishment, implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of the quality management system. The organization did not provide adequate collection baskets for the products ejecting from the moulding machines, which resulted in products falling onto the factory floor and becoming nonconforming.

The following options are not correct:

•Option D: 9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a poorly worded nonconformity (NC 3). This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.2.2 does not specify the requirements for the wording of nonconformities in internal audit reports. The nonconformity (NC 3) stated by the internal auditor was clear and relevant to the audit criteria and audit evidence. The issue is not with the report, but with the corrective action taken by the organization.

•Option E: 8.6 - Dirty products were released to the customer. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.6 requires the organization to implement planned arrangements, at appropriate stages, to verify that the product and service requirements have been met. The scenario does not indicate that the dirty products were released to the customer, but that they were recalled and repaired then returned to the customers. The issue is not with the release, but with the production process and the environment.

•Option F: 7.3 - Staff were not aware that products were falling onto the factory floor. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.3 requires the organization to ensure that the persons doing work under its control are aware of the quality policy, relevant quality objectives, their contribution to the effectiveness of the quality management system, and the implications of not conforming with the quality management system requirements. The scenario does not indicate that the staff were not aware of these aspects, but that the management did not provide adequate resources and environment for the staff to perform their work. The issue is not with the awareness, but with the management responsibility and resource provision.

•Option G: 10.2.1 - Conduct of an investigation was not sufficient to understand the cause of the nonconformity. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.2.1 requires the organization to react to the nonconformity and, as applicable, take action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences. The scenario indicates that the Quality Manager conducted an investigation into the reject rates and identified the cause of the nonconformity. The issue is not with the investigation, but with the corrective action taken by the management.

•Option H: 8.5.1 - Production operations were not properly controlled to avoid reject products. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.5.1 requires the organization to implement production and service provision under controlled conditions. The scenario indicates that the production operations were controlled by the moulding machines, which ejected the products into the collection baskets. The issue is not with the production operations, but with the size of the collection baskets and the condition of the factory floor.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.9 (Corrective Actions):

Minor nonconformities do not require a follow-up audit but must be corrected before the next surveillance audit.

Follow-up audits are required only for major nonconformities.

The audit team should recommend corrective actions, not enforce immediate follow-ups for minor nonconformities.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit):

Internal audits are conducted by employees of the company who are trained as auditors.

External auditors are not mandatory unless required by the organization.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

 Understanding "Context of the Organization":

The term "context of the organization" is defined in ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1, which states:

"The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended result(s) of its quality management system."

The definition emphasizes identifying both internal and external issues that influence the organization's approach to developing and achieving its objectives.

 Option Analysis:

Option A:Correct. This option aligns with the standard definition as it explicitly mentions the combination of internal and external issues that affect the organization’s approach to achieving its objectives, which is the essence of Clause 4.1.

Option B:Incorrect. The term "comparison of internal and external issues" does not reflect the ISO 9001 requirements. The standard does not require a comparison but rather an understanding of these issues.

Option C:Incorrect. Although it mentions "complexity," the focus of ISO 9001:2015 is on identifying relevant issues rather than the complexity of those issues.

Option D:Incorrect. This option mentions "coordination" and focuses only on the positive or negative effects. ISO 9001 requires identifying issues but does not emphasize coordination.

 Clause Reference and Relevance:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to understand their context because internal and external factors can influence the Quality Management System's effectiveness. Understanding this context helps in:

Addressing risks and opportunities (Clause 6.1).

Aligning the QMS with the organization’s strategic direction.

 Why A is Correct:

"Combination of internal and external issues" captures the essence of Clause 4.1, making it the accurate definition of the context of the organization.

A screenshot of a chat Description automatically generated

According to the ISO 9000:2015 document, the seven quality management principles are:

Customer focus

Leadership

Engagement of people

Process approach

Improvement

Evidence-based decision making

Relationship management

For each principle, the document provides a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply the principle in your organization.

Based on the document, here is a possible way to match a potential benefit to each of the four quality management principles you mentioned:

Table

Quality management principle

Potential benefit

Customer focus

Increased revenue and market share

Engagement of people

Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organization

Improvement

Enhanced drive for innovation

Evidence-based decision making

Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Once a Stage 2 certification audit has commenced, certain logistical or planning-related elements may still be adjusted, while others are fixed by prior agreement and cannot be changed.

✅ C. Audit Plan:

The audit plan is a document that outlines the scope, objectives, criteria, and logistics of the audit. According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (the standard for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems), clause 9.2.3.3 allows for modification of the audit plan based on real-time conditions during the audit — such as availability of auditees or changes in process access.

✅ F. Increase of Audit Duration:

Audit duration is generally determined during audit planning based on factors like employee count, risk, complexity, etc. However, if during Stage 2 it is found that more time is needed (e.g., due to additional processes, scope not fully covered, or significant findings), auditors are permitted to extend the audit. This ensures full coverage of all required areas as per ISO/IEC 17021-1 clause 9.1.4 and IAF MD 5.

❌ A. Agreed Language of the Audit:

This is determined and agreed upon in the contract and audit planning stages. Changing it during Stage 2 would create communication and documentation issues, especially in multi-site or multi-national audits.

❌ B. Audit Scope:

The audit scope is defined in the contract and certification agreement based on clause 4.3 of ISO 9001:2015. Changing it mid-audit would invalidate planning, required competencies, and potentially even the certification basis.

❌ D. Agreed Standard for the Audit Criteria:

Changing the standard (e.g., from ISO 9001 to ISO 13485) is fundamentally altering the purpose and contractual basis of the audit and is not permissible once Stage 2 has started.

❌ E. Audit Checklist:

The checklist is a tool prepared by the auditor as part of audit preparation and is based on the audit plan and standard requirements. While it may be adapted during the audit (e.g., if new risks arise), it does not constitute a formal change like duration or scope.

Relevant References:

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.3 (Audit Plan Modification)

IAF MD 5:2019 (Duration of QMS Audits)

ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.3 (Scope of the QMS)

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.1.4 (Audit Duration)

Nonconformity report

ISO 9001 Clause Number: 9.3.1 Nature of problem: Management review has not been conducted at the defined frequency. ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled: ISO 9001 - “Top management shall review the organization’s quality management system at planned intervals.” Evidence: The last management review took place nine months ago, and the previous one took place one year before the latest review. The planned interval is six months.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

A horizontal audit examines one process across multiple departments to assess consistency.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.2 (Audit Program Management):

The audit committee is responsible for establishing the internal audit program.

The audit schedule (A) is determined within the program, but it is not the main role of the committee.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

To demonstrate top management’s leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system, the following four actions would be indicative:

B. Briefing staff on the development of an improvement culture: This shows that top management is actively involved in promoting a culture of continuous improvement, which is a key aspect of the quality management system1.

C. Chairing management review meetings: By leading these meetings, top management demonstrates their involvement in the quality management system’s ongoing performance and commitment to its continual improvement1.

E. Investing time and money in corrective actions arising from nonconformities: This indicates that top management is committed to addressing issues and ensuring that the quality management system is effective and continually improving1.

G. Promoting the importance of following procedures: When top management emphasizes the importance of adherence to procedures, it reinforces the significance of the quality management system and its processes1.

These actions align with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes the need for top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system and to promote a focus on continual improvement and customer satisfaction123. Approving company car budgets, conducting disciplinary meetings, and not attending the audit closing meeting do not directly demonstrate leadership and commitment to the quality management system1.

According to the guidance on conducting the audit closing meeting1, the audit team leader should provide a summary of the audit findings and conclusions, invite discussions, and agree on timelines for any corrective actions. The audit team leader should also be respectful, constructive, and objective when presenting the nonconformities, and avoid any personal or emotional comments. The audit team leader should also consider the impact of the disruptive event (such as the Covid-19 pandemic) on the auditee’s context, interested parties, and risks2, and acknowledge any good practices or improvements observed during the audit. Therefore, option D is the best option, as it follows the best practices for the closing meeting and allows the auditee to understand the nonconformities and their implications, and to participate in the analysis and resolution of the issues. Option A is not correct, as it is not respectful, constructive, or objective, and it does not invite any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also assumes that the audit team leader has the authority to recommend the removal of the supplier from the approved list, which may not be the case. Option B is not correct, as it does not provide enough information or explanation to the auditee, and it does not allow any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, acknowledging any good practices, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. Option C is not correct, as it does not involve the other managers who are responsible for the functions or processes that were audited, and who may have valuable input or information to share. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, inviting discussions, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. References: 1: Conducting the Audit Closing Meeting: Sharing the Results2: Auditing ISO 9001:2015 in the Context of a Disruptive Event.

Here is the correct matching of ISO 9001:2015 clauses to the steps mentioned in the change management process:

We identified risks and opportunities and fed these into our risk management processes.

Clause 6.1 (Actions to address risks and opportunities)

We found a suitable supplier.

Clause 8.4 (Control of externally provided processes, products, and services)

We monitored customer feedback and noticed an increase in negative feedback about lead times.

Clause 9.1.2 (Customer satisfaction)

We put together a plan for implementation.

Clause 6.2.2 (Planning to achieve quality objectives)

We monitored the performance of the new supplier.

Clause 8.4.2 (Type and extent of control of external providers)

We noticed that productivity targets were being missed.

Clause 9.1.1 (Monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation)

We communicated the plan internally.

Clause 7.4 (Communication)

We looked at the data at the management review and decided we needed to do something different.

Clause 9.3.2 (Management review inputs)

We reorganised the staffing and implemented redundancies.

Clause 7.1.2 (People)

We set an objective to effectively implement the transition and outsource manufacturing.

Clause 6.2.1 (Quality objectives and planning to achieve them)

This aligns the steps of the change process with relevant ISO 9001:2015 clauses related to risk, planning, communication, and monitoring.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to identify and control nonconforming outputs to prevent unintended use or delivery.

Clause References:

Clause 8.7 (Control of Nonconforming Outputs): Organizations must ensure that nonconforming outputs are identified and controlled to prevent unintended use or delivery.

Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action): Requires organizations to take appropriate actions when nonconformities are found, including during or after service provision.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

If nonconforming products or services are identified after delivery or during service, organizations must take corrective actions to protect customers and stakeholders.

Actions may include recalls, rework, customer notifications, compensation, or process improvements.

This approach aligns with ISO 9001:2015, ensuring that products/services consistently meet requirements.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Retaining documentation only) → While documentation is required, it alone does not ensure proper handling of nonconforming outputs.

B (Verifying conformity before correction) → While verification is good practice, ISO 9001 prioritizes corrective action over mere verification.

D (Allowing employees to handle nonconformities without structure) → ISO 9001 requires documented procedures for handling nonconformities (Clause 8.7).

The activities that are specifically required by ISO 17021-1 as part of third-party (Certification Body) surveillance audit processes are:

•Option A: Audit use of certification marks on marketing materials. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to audit the client’s use of marks and/or any other reference to certification, as applicable, to ensure conformity with the certification requirements.

•Option B: Review changes to the QMS since last visit. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to review any changes affecting the client’s quality management system and its ability to continue to fulfil the requirements of the standard used for certification.

•Option C: Confirm effectiveness of internal audit and management review. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to confirm the continuing effectiveness of the client’s quality management system, including the effectiveness of the internal audit and management review processes.

•Option F: Review the status of previously raised findings and audit effectiveness of any outstanding findings. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to review the status of findings and any corrective actions taken by the client in response to previous audits, and to verify the effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions.

•Option H: Verify legal compliance. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to verify the client’s compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements related to the scope of certification.

•Option I: Handling of customer complaints since last visit. This option is correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 requires the certification body to review the client’s handling of customer complaints related to the certified activities since the last audit.

The following options are not correct:

•Option D: Complete a full document review of the quality management system. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to complete a full document review of the quality management system during surveillance audits. A full document review is only required during the initial certification audit or when there are significant changes to the quality management system or the certification requirements.

•Option E: Failing to meet financial responsibilities. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to audit the client’s financial responsibilities during surveillance audits. The certification body may have contractual arrangements with the client regarding the payment of fees, but this is not part of the surveillance audit process.

•Option G: Review the calibration status of the instrumentation. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to review the calibration status of the instrumentation during surveillance audits. The certification body may audit the client’s monitoring and measuring resources as part of the quality management system requirements, but this is not a specific activity required by ISO 17021-1.

•Option J: Conduct a minimum number of annual surveillance audits during the certification period. This option is not correct because ISO 17021-1:2015 clause 9.6.2.2 does not require the certification body to conduct a minimum number of annual surveillance audits during the certification period. The certification body may determine the frequency and duration of surveillance audits based on the risk and performance of the client, but this is not a specific activity required by ISO 17021-1.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 5.1.2 (Customer Focus) states that top management must ensure customer satisfaction by monitoring customer perceptions.

In scenario 2, top management initiated customer surveys, demonstrating their commitment to customer focus as required by Clause 5.1.2.

Top management is responsible for establishing, implementing, and maintaining the quality policy. The quality policy provides a framework for setting quality objectives and must be compatible with the context of the organization and support its strategic direction. It should also provide a commitment to satisfy applicable requirements and to continuous improvement.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Audit risks are categorized into different types based on where failures may occur in the QMS audit process.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.3 – Managing Audit Risk: Defines different audit risks, including control risk.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

Control risk occurs when internal controls fail to prevent or detect nonconformities.

Even if controls exist, the risk remains if the QMS fails to identify or correct defects.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Inherent risk) → This refers to risks naturally present in processes, even before controls are applied.

C (Detection risk) → This is the risk that an auditor fails to detect nonconformities.

D (Operational risk) → This refers to risks related to day-to-day business operations, not QMS audits.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 4.3 (Determining the Scope of the Quality Management System) states that when determining the QMS scope, an organization must consider:

External and internal issues (Clause 4.1)

The needs and expectations of interested parties (Clause 4.2)

The products and services provided by the organization

In the scenario, Bell only considered top management's input, which fails to address Clause 4.2 (interested parties' expectations)—such as customers, suppliers, and regulatory authorities.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.2, an audit plan should include the following information:

The audit objectives, scope, and criteria

The audit team members and their roles and responsibilities

The audit schedule, including the sequence and timings of audit activities, such as opening meeting, document review, interviews, observations, closing meeting, etc.

The expected time and duration of each audit activity and location

The name and contact details of the auditee’s representative and other relevant parties

The allocation of appropriate resources to support the audit activities

The audit methods and techniques to be used, such as interviews, observations, sampling, etc.

The audit documents and records to be prepared and retained

The audit language and communication methods

The audit risks and opportunities and how to address them

The audit follow-up arrangements, if applicable

Therefore, the correct answer is D and F, as they are essential elements of an audit plan. The other options are either irrelevant or optional for an audit plan. References:

ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.3.2

ISO 19011: Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems | ASQ, section “Making audit arrangements”

ISO 19011 Management Systems Audit Checklist | Process Street, task 6.3.2

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.5.1 (Certification Decision):

Auditors who conduct the audit cannot be involved in the certification decision to ensure impartiality.

The certification body alone is responsible for making the certification decision based on the audit report and findings.

The audit team leader (Eva) must not take part in the certification decision.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4, an organization is required to control the processes, products and services provided by external providers, including those that affect the quality of the organization’s own products and services. This includes determining the controls to be applied to the external provision of processes, products and services, as well as the information to be communicated to the external providers. The organization is also required to monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of the external providers and retain documented information of these activities.

Therefore, in the scenario given, ABC Ltd is responsible for controlling the processes, products and services provided by Teak Ltd, as they affect the quality of ABC Ltd’s own products and services. This means that ABC Ltd should have established criteria and methods for evaluating the performance of Teak Ltd, as well as documented information of the results of such evaluation. ABC Ltd should also have defined the supply arrangements with Teak Ltd, including the specifications, requirements, and verification activities related to the products and services provided by Teak Ltd.

Hence, the best options to describe how to plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd are A and D, as they are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4. The other options are either irrelevant or beyond the scope of the audit, as they do not pertain to the control of external provision by ABC Ltd.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Clause 5.1.1 of ISO 9001:2015 – Leadership and Commitment – specifically mandates that top management must take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. They are also responsible for ensuring:

Integration of the QMS into business processes (5.1.1 c)

Promotion of customer focus and continual improvement (5.1.1 d, i)

Availability of necessary resources (5.1.1 e)

That the QMS achieves its intended results (5.1.1 g)

Let’s analyze the selected options:

✅ A. Top management is not accountable for the effectiveness of the QMS.

This directly violates clause 5.1.1 a, which explicitly requires top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. Delegating this to a middle-level Quality Manager, as described in the scenario, constitutes a nonconformity.

✅ F. The Quality Manager does not have access to the resources needed for the QMS.

According to clause 5.1.1 e, top management must ensure the availability of required resources for maintaining and improving the QMS. If the Quality Manager is resource-constrained, it indicates top management has failed to meet this requirement.

Now, why the other options are incorrect in terms of direct clause 5.1.1 nonconformity:

❌ B. Avoiding giving improvement actions to the Chief Executive – While this may reflect poor communication, it is not, by itself, a clear breach of 5.1.1 unless linked directly to top management’s lack of accountability or commitment.

❌ C. Chief Executive never attending meetings – ISO 9001 does not require physical attendance of the Chief Executive at management reviews. What matters is whether top management is fulfilling their roles, not how.

❌ D. Completing only half of improvement actions – This indicates performance issues but does not necessarily indicate top management’s lack of accountability, unless they failed to monitor progress entirely.

❌ E. Reporting to one designated senior manager – This is not inherently nonconforming unless that senior manager does not fulfill top management’s responsibilities under 5.1.1.

Relevant ISO 9001:2015 Reference:

Clause 5.1.1 a, e, g, h:

"Top management shall demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system by:

a) taking accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system;

e) ensuring that the resources needed for the quality management system are available..."

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.1 (Impartiality) states that:

Internal auditors must be independent of the processes they audit to ensure objectivity.

Auditing one’s own department introduces bias and is not permitted.

Thus, Sean must not allow the auditor to audit their own department.

Understanding Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015:Clause 6.2 (Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them) specifies that organizations must:

Establish measurable and relevant quality objectives consistent with the quality policy (Clause 6.2.1).

Include objectives applicable to product/service conformity and customer satisfaction.

Document these objectives and their planning as documented information (Clause 6.2.1 & 6.2.2).

Plan how to achieve the objectives, including defining actions, resources, responsibilities, timelines, and methods for evaluation.

Analysis of Options:

A. Quality objectives are not being implemented by the organisation's personnel:Incorrect. While implementation is critical, this relates more to operational aspects rather than the direct requirements of Clause 6.2. Implementation issues would typically raise concerns under Clause 9.1 (Performance Evaluation).

B. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 9001 correctly:Incorrect. The consultant's interpretation of ISO 9001 is irrelevant in terms of Clause 6.2 compliance. The focus is on whether the organization aligns with the requirements, not the consultant's role.

C. Establishing quality objectives did not include top management:Incorrect. While top management involvement is vital for QMS effectiveness (Clause 5.1), this is not a direct requirement of Clause 6.2. Top management alignment is implied but not explicitly mandated for establishing quality objectives.

D. Quality objectives were not established in alignment with the organisation's quality policy:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 requires that quality objectives be consistent with the organization’s quality policy, ensuring they reflect its purpose, strategic direction, and commitment to continual improvement. Misalignment would constitute a nonconformity.

E. The organisation cannot afford to undertake quality objectives all at once:Incorrect. Financial constraints are not directly addressed in Clause 6.2. The clause focuses on planning to achieve objectives, which includes defining the necessary resources but does not demand achieving all objectives simultaneously.

F. Quality objectives are not maintained as documented information:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 specifically requires that quality objectives be maintained as documented information. Failure to document the objectives is a direct violation of this clause.

Why Options D and F Are Correct:

D: Misalignment between the quality objectives and the quality policy directly violates Clause 6.2.1, which mandates that objectives support the strategic direction of the organization.

F: Lack of documentation for quality objectives breaches the requirement to maintain them as documented information under Clause 6.2.1.

Relevant References:

Clause 6.2.1: Establishing quality objectives aligned with the quality policy.

Clause 6.2.2: Maintaining documented information for quality objectives and planning to achieve them.

Clause 5.1.1: Top management's responsibility to ensure alignment between the QMS and strategic direction.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

A technical expert is someone with specialized knowledge that helps the audit team understand specific technical aspects of the auditee’s processes.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 7.3.4 – Use of Technical Experts:

Technical experts support the audit team with specialized knowledge but do not perform the audit themselves.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

A technical expert is needed when auditors lack deep expertise in specific areas, such as engineering, software, or medical devices.

They assist in interpreting complex technical requirements but do not act as auditors.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Observer) → Observers do not contribute expertise; they only watch the audit (e.g., trainees).

C (Guide) → Guides help with logistics but do not provide technical expertise.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.5 (Determining Audit Team Competence), technical experts:

Provide specialized knowledge in an audit.

Must operate under the supervision of an auditor to ensure compliance with audit protocols.

Cannot work independently or under the auditee’s supervision, as they are not responsible for the audit's findings.

The audit team leader has overall responsibility, but technical experts are supervised by an auditor during the audit process.

Table

Statement

First-party audits

Second-party audits

Third-party audits

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.

Yes

No

No

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.

No

No

Yes

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.

No

Yes

No

Here is a brief explanation of each statement:

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.

When an organization wishes to extend the scope of their current certification to include new services or activities, such as the printing and compilation of computer documentation packages, it requires an extension to the scope of the audit. This involves a formal application process with the certification body to ensure that the new activities are included in the audit plan and that the organization’s quality management system encompasses these new processes12. References: = The answer is based on the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group guidance on scope and applicability, which outlines the need for a formal application process when there is a change in the scope of the quality management system that affects the certification1. Additionally, the UKAS guide on the extension to scope (ETS) process provides information on how changes to the scope, including the addition of new services, require a formal application2.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015 (Conformity Assessment – Requirements for Certification Bodies), Clause 9.3.1.2, the Stage 1 Audit typically consumes around 30% of the total audit time.

This time is allocated to:

Reviewing documented information.

Assessing the readiness for Stage 2.

Identifying potential nonconformities.

A 20% allocation (Answer A) is too low, and 40% (Answer C) is excessive, as the majority of the audit should be spent on Stage 2 (on-site verification).

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to measure and monitor customer perceptions to determine whether customer requirements are being met.

Clause Reference:

Clause 9.1.2 – Customer Satisfaction states that organizations must monitor customer perceptions using relevant methods such as customer surveys, feedback forms, and complaint analysis.

One of the most effective ways to do this is gap analysis, which identifies differences between customer expectations and actual service or product performance.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Gap analysis helps determine discrepancies between current performance and customer expectations, allowing organizations to improve quality.

It is a standard quality improvement tool used to assess customer satisfaction.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (PEST analysis) → Focuses on external macroeconomic factors (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) rather than customer satisfaction.

B (Market-share analysis) → Examines business performance relative to competitors, not customer perceptions.

D (Competitive benchmarking) → Involves comparing processes with competitors but does not directly monitor customer perceptions.

Clause 8.3.4.d of ISO 9001:2015 requires that design and development validation be performed to ensure that the resulting products or services meet the requirements for their specified application or intended use. Validation is critical to confirm that the product works as intended in real-world conditions.

In this case, Noitol omitted the design validation step approximately 50% of the time, which is a direct violation of Clause 8.3.4.d. Although they collect feedback after the fact, this is not a substitute for formal validation before the product is released. The nonconformity arises because the process of validation was neglected, not the recording of improvements or feedback.

Other options, such as documenting improvements (A) or issues with planning verification (B), are important but do not directly address the primary concern: the lack of consistent design validation before product release. Option D (8.6) concerns product release, but this nonconformity focuses on the validation stage, not just approval for release​.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 7.2, an auditor shall have the competence to:

Understand the requirements of ISO 9001 and how they relate to the audit

Understand the organization’s quality management system and its processes

Understand the applicable legal, regulatory, contractual and other requirements that affect the audit

Understand the needs and expectations of interested parties other than customers

Plan and conduct audits in accordance with ISO 19011

Evaluate audit evidence and draw appropriate conclusions

Communicate audit findings effectively1

Therefore, knowledge of ISO 9001 requirements and ISO 19011 audit principles are essential for every member of an audit team auditing an ISO 9001 quality management system.

The table below shows the possible matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 extract to the audit evidence.

Table

Audit evidence

ISO 9001 Clause 8.3 extract

Half of all new products launched in the past 12 months were late. The NPD Manager explains he has not got enough people on his team to cope with the demand for new products.

“8.3.2 e) … internal … resource needs for the design and development of products …”

The NPD Manager explains many changes are made to cosmetic formulations during product development owing to retailer feedback. Only when confirmed by the retailer is the agreed formulation documented on SWIFT.

“8.3.5 … retain documented information …”

The NPD Manager explains that the customer confirms their approval to proceed with a new formulation by email. These emails are kept on SWIFT.

“8.3.6 … retain documented information …”

The NPD Manager shows you evidence of consumer trials that are carried out for some new products prior to full-scale launch.

“8.3.4 d) … conducted to ensure that the resulting products and services meet the requirements …”

The NPD Manager explains that an approved external laboratory is used to perform shelf-life stability trials on some formulations during product development.

“8.3.2 e) … external … resource needs for the design and development of products …”

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

An audit’s feasibility must be assessed using multiple factors, not just resource availability.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.3 – Establishing the Audit Program: Requires consideration of logistical, technical, and cooperation factors when assessing audit feasibility.

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.3 – Determining Feasibility of the Audit: Requires evaluating more than just resources to ensure a successful audit.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

Audit feasibility should consider:

Availability of information (documents, records).

Cooperation from the auditee.

Operational conditions that might affect the audit.

Scope and complexity of the QMS being audited.

Resource availability alone is not enough to determine feasibility.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Top management determines feasibility) → Incorrect because feasibility is determined by the certification body, not the auditee.

C (Resources alone are sufficient) → Incorrect because other key factors must be evaluated.

D (Final authority lies with the audit leader) → Incorrect because ISO requires multiple factors to be considered, not just an auditor’s decision.

Non-Conformity Report:

ISO 9001 Clause Number

Nature of Problem

ISO 9001 Requirement That Has Not Been Fulfilled

6.1.1

Several risks and opportunities have not been determined.

"The organization shall consider the requirements referred to in 4.2 and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed."

6.1.2 (a)

Actions to address risks and opportunities not planned.

"The organization shall plan actions to address risks and opportunities."

Step-by-Step Reasoning:

Clause 6.1.1 - Determining Risks and Opportunities:

Requirement: The organization must determine risks and opportunities that are relevant to its Quality Management System (QMS). This ensures that the QMS achieves intended results and prevents undesired effects.

Problem Identified: While some risks and opportunities were discussed, the organization did not perform a systematic evaluation of all risks (e.g., health and safety legislation changes, retiring trainers).

Clause 6.1.2 (a) - Planning Actions for Risks and Opportunities:

Requirement: The organization must plan actions to address identified risks and opportunities. These actions should be integrated into the QMS processes to ensure continuous improvement.

Problem Identified: The Quality Systems Manager confirmed that no plans were made to address the risks and opportunities because the Managing Director deemed it unnecessary. This violates the requirement to plan actions.

Correct Options Selected:

Clause 6.1.1 with the nature of the problem as: "Several risks and opportunities have not been determined."

Clause 6.1.2 (a) with the nature of the problem as: "Actions to address risks and opportunities not planned."

ISO 9001 Requirements Not Fulfilled:

For 6.1.1:"The organization shall consider the requirements referred to in 4.2 and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed."

For 6.1.2 (a):"The organization shall plan actions to address risks and opportunities."

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9000:2015, which provides definitions for terms used in ISO 9001:2015, a management system is defined as a set of interrelated or interacting elements of an organization to establish policies, objectives, and processes to achieve those objectives.

A Quality Management System (QMS) is a type of management system that ensures organizations meet customer and regulatory requirements while improving performance.

Clause 3.5.3 of ISO 9000:2015 clearly defines "management system" and aligns with this question. The other options do not fit the definition:

Standard refers to an established norm or requirement.

Organization scope defines the boundaries of a QMS but is not a system itself.

Quality manual is a document (optional under ISO 9001:2015) that describes a QMS but is not the system itself.

•To evaluate the preparedness of the organisation for a Stage 2 audit: This objective involves assessing the readiness of the organisation to undergo the Stage 2 audit, where the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system will be verified123. The audit team will check the level of implementation and understanding of the quality management system, identify any major gaps or nonconformities, and confirm the audit scope, criteria, and plan123.

•To review the quality manual: This objective involves reviewing the documented information of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team will also evaluate the organisation’s understanding and application of the standard, and identify any areas of improvement or concern123.

The other options are not included in the objectives of the Stage 1 initial certification audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.

Based on the scenario and the concept of an ‘audit trail’ within the context of ISO 9001, the three statements that apply would likely be:

A. Decisions on improvement action timescales not involving departmental managers. This indicates a lack of involvement and communication with those responsible for implementing the improvements, which is a key part of an effective audit trail1.

B. Evaluation of the results of the improvement action not always documented by the Quality Manager. Proper documentation is essential for an audit trail, as it provides evidence that actions have been evaluated and are effective1.

C. Limited knowledge of the content of Quality Improvement Requests by departmental staff. An audit trail should ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and understand the actions being taken, which is not the case here1.

These points suggest issues with the communication, documentation, and involvement of relevant personnel in the quality management system processes, which are crucial for maintaining an effective audit trail and, by extension, a robust quality management system.

Here is the correct matching of the activities with the responsible parties in the context of a second-party audit:

Define the audit scope: Customer

Develop the audit plan: Audit team leader

Respond to the audit findings: External provider

Conduct the audit: Audit team

This reflects the typical division of responsibilities in a second-party audit, where the customer (the party commissioning the audit) sets the scope, the audit team leader manages the planning, the external provider responds to findings, and the audit team carries out the audit.

The ISO 9001 Lead Auditor exam requires the auditor to have a thorough understanding of the ISO 9001:2015 standard and its requirements, as well as the organization’s context, processes, risks, opportunities, and performance. Therefore, the auditor needs to ask for additional information that can help them verify these aspects during the audit planning stage. Some of the information that can be useful are:

A description of responsibilities and authorities of the key roles of XYZ: This can help the auditor to identify who is accountable for what in the organization and how they communicate with each other.

The number of personnel involved in activities related to the quality management system: This can help the auditor to assess if there are enough resources and competencies to support the QMS implementation and operation.

Information to understand XYZ’s operations: This can help the auditor to understand how XYZ produces or delivers its products or services and what are its main processes and inputs.

The results of XYZ’s last internal audit: This can help the auditor to evaluate if XYZ has implemented corrective actions based on previous audit findings and if it has maintained its QMS effectiveness.

The results of the last two management reviews: This can help the auditor to determine if XYZ has monitored its QMS performance against its objectives and if it has identified any significant changes or opportunities for improvement.

The quality manual (B) is not a required document for ISO 9001 certification, but it may be useful for internal reference or training purposes. It is not necessary for audit planning.

The following table shows the possible matching of the records to the requirements of clause 8.4:

Table

Requirements

Records

Define product requirements

Product specification

Criteria for selection

List of requirements to be met by the external provider

Evaluation of potential external provider

External provider questionnaire

External provider selection

Approved external provider list

Communicate requirements

Purchase order

Monitoring of performance

External provider delivery times and quality issues

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

Define the product requirements that are relevant for the external provision, such as specifications, drawings, standards, codes, etc. These should be documented and communicated to the external provider. A record of the product specification can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently. A record of the list of requirements to be met by the external provider can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed. A record of the external provider questionnaire can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved. A record of the approved external provider list can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely. A record of the purchase order can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed. A record of the external provider delivery times and quality issues can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Discussing audit findings before the closing meeting ensures that:

The audit objectives have been met (ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.10).

The auditee has an opportunity to clarify misunderstandings or provide additional evidence.

The audit team and the auditee agree on the accuracy of findings before finalizing the report.

While encouraging corrective actions (B) is beneficial, the primary purpose of discussing findings is to ensure that the audit was conducted effectively and aligned with objectives. Identifying responsible persons (C) is not the auditor’s role.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.2.2 (Audit Planning):

The audit team leader is responsible for planning the audit and assigning roles.

Top management (A) does not plan the audit, but they provide resources.

While team members may provide input, the leader has the final authority.

Thus, B is the correct answer.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.7 requires that an organization identify and control any nonconforming outputs that do not conform to the requirements of the customer or other relevant requirements. Nonconforming outputs are any outputs from the process, product or service that do not meet the specified quality criteria. Nonconforming outputs must be dealt with in one or more of the following ways:

Correction of the nonconformity

Segregation, containment, return or suspension of provision of products and services

Informing the customer

Authorisation for acceptance under concession

The organization must also retain documented information on the description of the nonconformity, the actions taken, any concessions obtained, and the identification of the authority deciding the action to resolve the nonconformity.

In this scenario, you have interviewed a line supervisor who is responsible for managing a manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products. The supervisor has explained that these plastic items are rejected at this stage because they do not meet their processing standards and they can damage their machinery and compromise their quality standards. The supervisor has also mentioned that some of these rejected items are melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled.

Based on this information, you can investigate further by taking two actions:

A. Check the process for handling nonconforming items: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for identifying, segregating, containing, returning or suspending provision of nonconforming items at this stage. You can also check whether there is a system for informing customers about any nonconforming items that may affect their satisfaction or expectations.

D. Determine what happens to the waste products: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for disposing of waste products that cannot be recycled as per environmental regulations and customer requirements.

These two actions would help you to determine whether there are any nonconforming outputs at this stage and how they are controlled by the organization.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Stage 1 Audit (ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2.2) is a documentation review to assess the readiness for a Stage 2 Audit. The auditor must document:

Observations that could lead to nonconformities, ensuring they are addressed before Stage 2.

Areas needing improvement, such as missing documented information or unclear process definitions.

While understanding the auditee’s main processes is important, documenting interviews is not a requirement at Stage 1.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = According to the web search results from my internal tool, a witness audit is a technique used during an accreditation audit, where the accreditation body observes the performance and competence of the certification body auditors in conducting an audit12. A witness audit can also be used by a certification body to monitor and evaluate its own auditors3. During a witness audit, the following roles can be defined:

•An auditor: This is the person who is being witnessed by the accreditation body or the certification body. The auditor is responsible for conducting the audit according to the audit plan, criteria, and standards, and for providing audit evidence and findings123.

•An assessor for the accreditation body: This is the person who witnesses the auditor on behalf of the accreditation body. The assessor is responsible for evaluating the auditor’s performance and competence, and for providing feedback and recommendations to the accreditation body123.

The other options are not defined as witnesses during a witness audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They are:

•Someone with a qualification from the certification body: This is not a specific role in a witness audit, as anyone who is involved in the audit process should have a qualification from the certification body. Moreover, having a qualification does not necessarily mean that the person is a witness or an auditor4.

•An existing member of the audit team: This is not a specific role in a witness audit, as the audit team consists of the auditors who are conducting the audit, not the ones who are witnessing it. The witness audit is a separate activity from the audit itself, and the witness should not interfere with the audit process or influence the audit outcome123.

Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.

The individual(s) managing the audit programme and the auditee are both roles that contribute to the audit outcomes. The individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for planning, conducting, and reporting on the audit activities, as well as ensuring that they are aligned with the organization’s quality objectives and risk management processes1. The auditee is the person or entity that is subject to an audit, and their participation, cooperation, and feedback are essential for achieving a successful audit outcome2. References:

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Candidate Handbook

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material

ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course IRCA Certified

As the audit team leader, it is crucial to manage differing opinions constructively and ensure that the correct clause is selected for the nonconformity based on solid evidence. Here’s how the situation should be handled:

E. Invite you and the second auditor to fully explain your point of view and then decide which clause to select: This promotes collaboration and transparency, allowing both auditors to present their rationale for choosing the specific clause.

F. Review the evidence with you and the second auditor, and then decide which clause of ISO 9001 would best apply: Reviewing the evidence in relation to the specific requirements of ISO 9001 is essential for determining which clause is most appropriate.

H. Try to obtain a consensus between you and the second auditor after a discussion of the different opinions: Consensus-building is a crucial skill for an audit team leader. Achieving agreement ensures the nonconformity is addressed accurately and with full team support.

Options such as overruling immediately (D) or deferring the decision without full discussion (B) could undermine team dynamics and the audit process. Consulting the quality manager (A) or selecting an entirely different clause (G) is unnecessary, as the team should resolve the issue internally​​.

Quality management principles:

Customer focus = Increased revenue and market share

Engagement of people = Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organisation

Improvement = Enhanced drive for innovation

Evidence-based decision-making = Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

According to the Quality management principles document published by ISO, each quality management principle has a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply it. Based on these descriptions, the potential benefits can be matched to the corresponding principles as follows:

Customer focus: The primary focus of quality management is to meet customer requirements and to strive to exceed customer expectations. The key benefits of this principle include increased customer value, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, repeat business, reputation, customer base, revenue and market share.

Engagement of people: Competent, empowered and engaged people at all levels throughout the organization are essential to enhance its capability to create and deliver value. The key benefits of this principle include improved understanding of the organization’s objectives and values, increased involvement in improvement activities, enhanced personal development, increased motivation and empowerment, enhanced trust and collaboration, and increased recognition and rewards.

Improvement: Successful organizations have an ongoing focus on improvement. The key benefits of this principle include improved organizational capabilities, alignment of improvement activities at all levels, increased ability to anticipate and react to opportunities and threats, enhanced drive for innovation, and increased levels of satisfaction.

Evidence-based decision-making: Decisions based on the analysis and evaluation of data and information are more likely to produce desired results. The key benefits of this principle include improved decision-making processes, increased ability to demonstrate the effectiveness of past decisions, increased ability to review, challenge and change opinions and decisions, and increased ability to improve performance.

B. Applicable procedure: SP-701

D. Identification number of the washing machine

H. The concentration of the cleaning liquid used vs the concentration fixed in SP-701

I. The planned duration of the process vs the minimum time required in SP-701

J. Weight of linen being washed vs the maximum weight required in SP-701

C. Competence record of the machine operator

Questions no: 1 Verified Answer: = C, D, E Comprehensive But Short Explanation: = Potential threats to impartiality in an audit context include familiarity (having a close relationship with the auditee), intimidation (being coerced or feeling pressured), and self-audit (auditing one’s own work). These factors can compromise the auditor’s objectivity and the audit’s integrity. References: = The information is based on the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group documents which discuss threats to auditor impartiality and how they may compromise an auditor’s objectivity123.