PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Auditors must have competence in risk-based auditing to effectively assess an organization’s QMS performance and compliance.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 7.2.3 – Determining Auditor Competence:

Auditors must have knowledge of risk-based thinking to assess risk impact on processes.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 0.3.3 – Risk-Based Thinking:

The standard emphasizes proactive risk management, which auditors must understand.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

Risk-based auditing ensures audits focus on high-risk areas, improving audit effectiveness.

Auditors must assess how organizations apply risk-based thinking in decision-making, process control, and improvement.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Industry knowledge) → While helpful, it is not mandatory for all auditors.

C (Expertise in all domains) → Auditors are not required to be experts in all areas, just in audit methodology.

D (Formal degree in quality management) → ISO does not require a formal degree, just competence in audit principles and methods.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

✅ Correct Option D – “I will sign all the purchase orders now.”

This response represents an immediate correction in accordance with ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.4.3 – Information for external providers, which requires control over procurement documentation. The absence of required authorisation (signature) is a nonconformity in executing the organization’s purchasing procedure.

Clause 8.4.3 specifically mandates that the organization:

“Shall communicate to external providers its requirements for:

a) the processes, products and services to be provided;

b) the approval of:

products and services;

methods, processes, and equipment;

the release of products and services.”

The purchase order process includes documented approval, which in this case was defined internally as a signature by the Purchasing or Production Manager. Signing the documents retroactively, while not ideal, is a correction to bring the documentation back into compliance and resolve the immediate issue.

❌ Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. "No correction needed": Dismissing the nonconformity based on product performance fails to address the lack of documented control, violating Clause 8.4.3 and internal procedures.

B. "I will ask the Production Manager to sign them now": This option shows intention but lacks immediacy and ownership. Also, backdating signatures without traceability can be ethically questionable.

C. "I do not accept the nonconformity": This reflects noncompliance and a poor quality culture, contradicting ISO 9001’s Clause 5.1.1 (Leadership commitment).

According to clause 10.2.1.b of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent their recurrence. This means that the organization should identify and address the root causes and contributing factors of the nonconformities, and implement appropriate corrective actions that are effective and proportional to the impact of the nonconformities. In this case, the evidence statement that supports the finding of nonconformance is C, because it shows that the organization did not take effective actions to prevent the recurrence of the spelling errors in the print run, which resulted in repeated customer rejections and dissatisfaction. The other options are not directly related to clause 10.2.1.b, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option A may relate to clause 7.2 on competence, option B may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option D may relate to clause 7.1 on resources. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Nonconformity and Corrective Action], ISO 9001 Clause 10. Improvement - ISO-templates.com