PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

During a second-party audit of a dairy farm (by a potential customer) complying with ISO 9001:2015, the auditor verifies that there is large variability in the daily production of the milking yard. The current agreement with their only customer is to provide 2,000 litres per day. However, in the last two years, they have noticed an increasing variability in daily production.

If they produce less than 2,000 litres, they are penalised with a fine of 1.5 pesos for every litre that they do not provide. If they produce more than 2,000 litres, they use the extra milk to feed the pigs.

This process has been in operation for decades. The dairy farm was founded by the grandfather of the current owners, who did not want to alter the established practices.

The auditor raises a nonconformity on the basis that the process is not under control (Clause 8.1).

If you had been the auditor, which one of the following actions would you have accepted?

You are carrying out an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time. The

organisation manufactures cosmetics for major retailers and the name of the retailer supplied appears on the product

packaging. Sales turnover has increased significantly over the past five years. The organisation uses a software programme called SWIFT, which is used to record sales, plan production, purchase supplies, print despatch notes, track new product development, perform traceability exercises, carry out mass balance checks, raise invoices, create budgets, and support financial control.

You are nearing the end of the audit and you are reviewing your audit notes. You notice a recurring trend concerning the SWIFT database as shown below:

You ask the Quality Manager to explain how the SWIFT database is controlled. You learn that the Operations Director is

responsible for determining and progressing SWIFT software updates. You decide to meet the Operations Director (OD).

You: " Good afternoon. "

OD: " Good afternoon. "

You: " What responsibility do you have concerning the SWIFT database? "

OD: " I maintain it. If anyone wishes to propose an update to the database, they send me an email with

details of their proposal. I then either process the database update myself, or I send the request to the

consultant who designed the database 20 years ago. The necessary software changes are made, and the

amended software is immediately released to users. "

You: " Would you explain how the software amendments are controlled? "

OD: " Of course. I personally update every computer myself. "

You: " Do you inform the database users of the changes? "

OD: " No I don ' t. They find out for themselves by using the software, or they come to see me if they have

any questions. "

You: " How do you ensure that the database users use the latest version? "

OD: " That ' s easy, I update every computer myself. "

You: " During the audit, I noted there were several versions of SWIFT in use (you refer to your audit

notes). "

OD: " I know. That ' s because some versions work better than others, and depending on user needs and

experiences, we allow users to revert to using an earlier version if they find it works better for them. "

Based on the scenario, which two of the following statements are true? There is evidence of

nonconformity with a requirement defined in ...

Scenario 5: Mechanical-Electro (ME) Audit Stages

Mechanical-Electro, better known as ME, is an American company that provides mechanical and electrical services in China. Their services range from air-conditioning systems, ventilation systems, plumbing, to installation of electrical equipment in automobile plants, electronic manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants.

Due to the fierce competition from local Chinese companies and failing to meet customer requirements, ME ' s revenue dropped significantly. In addition, customers ' trust and confidence in the company decreased, and the reputation of the company was damaged.

In light of these developments, the top management of ME decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After having an effective QMS in place for over a year, they applied for a certification audit.

A team of four auditors was appointed for the audit, including Li Na as the audit team leader. Initially, the audit team conducted a general review of ME ' s documents, including the quality policy, operational procedures, inventory lists, QMS scope, process documentation, training records, and previous audit reports.

Li Na stated that this would allow the team to maintain a systematic and structured approach to gathering documents for all audit stages. While reviewing the documented information, the team observed some minor issues but did not identify any major nonconformities. Therefore, Li Na claimed that it was not necessary to prepare a report or conduct a meeting with ME ' s representatives at that stage of the audit. She stated that all areas of concern would be discussed in the next phase of the audit.

Following the on-site activities and the opening meeting with ME ' s top management, the audit team structured an audit test plan to verify whether ME’s QMS conformed to Clause 8.2.1 (Customer Communication) of ISO 9001.

To do so, they gathered information through group interviews and sampling. Li Na conducted interviews with departmental managers in the first group and then with top management. In addition, she chose a sampling method that sufficiently represented customer complaints from both areas of ME ' s operations.

The team members were responsible for the sampling procedure. They selected a sample size of 4 out of 45 customer complaints received weekly for electrical services and 2 out of 10 complaints for mechanical services.

Afterward, the audit team evaluated the evidence against the audit criteria and generated the audit findings.

After reviewing the documented information, Li Na claimed that it was not necessary to report the minor nonconformities that were identified; instead, they would be discussed in the next audit phase. Is this acceptable?