Pearson ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor New Attempt

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.9 (Corrective Actions):

Minor nonconformities do not require a follow-up audit but must be corrected before the next surveillance audit.

Follow-up audits are required only for major nonconformities.

The audit team should recommend corrective actions, not enforce immediate follow-ups for minor nonconformities.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Quality management principles:

Customer focus = Increased revenue and market share

Engagement of people = Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organisation

Improvement = Enhanced drive for innovation

Evidence-based decision-making = Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

According to the Quality management principles document published by ISO, each quality management principle has a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply it. Based on these descriptions, the potential benefits can be matched to the corresponding principles as follows:

Customer focus: The primary focus of quality management is to meet customer requirements and to strive to exceed customer expectations. The key benefits of this principle include increased customer value, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, repeat business, reputation, customer base, revenue and market share.

Engagement of people: Competent, empowered and engaged people at all levels throughout the organization are essential to enhance its capability to create and deliver value. The key benefits of this principle include improved understanding of the organization’s objectives and values, increased involvement in improvement activities, enhanced personal development, increased motivation and empowerment, enhanced trust and collaboration, and increased recognition and rewards.

Improvement: Successful organizations have an ongoing focus on improvement. The key benefits of this principle include improved organizational capabilities, alignment of improvement activities at all levels, increased ability to anticipate and react to opportunities and threats, enhanced drive for innovation, and increased levels of satisfaction.

Evidence-based decision-making: Decisions based on the analysis and evaluation of data and information are more likely to produce desired results. The key benefits of this principle include improved decision-making processes, increased ability to demonstrate the effectiveness of past decisions, increased ability to review, challenge and change opinions and decisions, and increased ability to improve performance.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Discussing audit findings before the closing meeting ensures that:

The audit objectives have been met (ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.10).

The auditee has an opportunity to clarify misunderstandings or provide additional evidence.

The audit team and the auditee agree on the accuracy of findings before finalizing the report.

While encouraging corrective actions (B) is beneficial, the primary purpose of discussing findings is to ensure that the audit was conducted effectively and aligned with objectives. Identifying responsible persons (C) is not the auditor’s role.

According to the ISO 19011:2018 document, the audit plan should provide the basis for agreement regarding the conduct and scheduling of the audit activities. The amount of detail provided in the audit plan should reflect the scope and complexity of the audit, as well as the risk of not achieving the audit objectives1. The scope of the audit refers to the extent and boundaries of the audit, such as the audit criteria, the audit objectives, the organizational and functional units, and the processes to be audited1. The complexity of the audit refers to the degree of difficulty or intricacy of the audit, such as the number and diversity of the auditees, the audit criteria, the audit methods, and the audit team composition2. The risk of not achieving the audit objectives refers to the possibility that the audit may fail to provide reliable and sufficient audit evidence to support the audit conclusions and report1.

Therefore, the complete sentence is:

In the context of a third-party audit, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan should reflect the scope and complexity of the audit, as well as the risk of not achieving the audit objectives.