DOP-C02 Exam Dumps : AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional

The most operationally efficient answer is to use Systems Manager Default Host Management Configuration. This feature is designed specifically to make EC2 instances become Systems Manager managed instances automatically without manually attaching an IAM instance profile to every instance. AWS states that Default Host Management Configuration manages EC2 instances automatically as managed instances and uses a default IAM role for the account and Region. It also requires IMDSv2, which the scenario already satisfies. Option A correctly creates the Systems Manager trusted role, attaches AmazonSSMManagedEC2InstanceDefaultPolicy, and configures the SSM service setting. Options B and D add AWS Config remediation complexity, and C uses Patch Manager incorrectly because SSM Agent is already installed and the requirement is automatic Systems Manager management.

================

The correct answer is A.

Option A is correct because it meets the requirements with the most operational efficiency. Updating the ecommerce application to emit a JSON object to a CloudWatch log group for each processed transaction is a simple and cost-effective way to collect the data needed for the dashboard. Using CloudWatch Logs Insights to query the log group and to visualize the results in a pie chart format is also a convenient and integrated solution that leverages the existing CloudWatch dashboards. Attaching the results to the desired CloudWatch dashboard is straightforward and does not require any additional steps or services.

Option B is incorrect because it introduces unnecessary complexity and cost. Updating the ecommerce application to emit a JSON object to an Amazon S3 bucket for each processed transaction is a valid way to store the data, but it requires creating and managing an S3 bucket and its permissions. Using Amazon Athena to query the S3 bucket and to visualize the results in a pie chart format is also a valid way to analyze the data, but it incurs charges based on the amount of data scanned by each query. Exporting the results from Athena and attaching them to the desired CloudWatch dashboard is also an extra step that adds more overhead and latency.

Option C is incorrect because it uses AWS X-Ray for an inappropriate purpose. Updating the ecommerce application to use AWS X-Ray for instrumentation is a good practice for monitoring and tracing distributed applications, but it is not designed for aggregating product transaction details. Creating a new X-Ray subsegment and adding an annotation for each processed transaction is possible, but it would clutter the X-Ray service map and make it harder to debug performance issues. Using X-Ray traces to query the data and to visualize the results in a pie chart format is also possible, but it would require custom code and logic that are not supported by X-Ray natively. Attaching the results to the desired CloudWatch dashboard is also not supported by X-Ray directly, and would require additional steps or services.

Option D is incorrect because it introduces unnecessary complexity and cost. Updating the ecommerce application to emit a JSON object to a CloudWatch log group for each processed transaction is a simple and cost-effective way to collect the data needed for the dashboard, as in option A. However, creating an AWS Lambda function to aggregate and write the results to Amazon DynamoDB is redundant, as CloudWatch Logs Insights can already perform aggregation queries on log data. Creating a Lambda subscription filter for the log file is also redundant, as CloudWatch Logs Insights can already access log data directly. Attaching the results to the desired CloudWatch dashboard would also require additional steps or services, as DynamoDB does not support native integration with CloudWatch dashboards.

The requirement specifies enforcing encryption before CloudFormation creates or updates resources. This is key because preventive enforcement must occur during the provisioning workflow, not after resources already exist. AWS provides CloudFormation Hooks specifically for this purpose. A Hook allows an organization to intercept a CloudFormation stack operation and validate resource configurations before provisioning occurs. This feature is recommended by AWS for pre-deployment governance such as enforcing encryption policies, tag compliance, or security restrictions.

By enabling trusted access between CloudFormation StackSets and AWS Organizations, the Hook can be deployed centrally from the delegated administrator account across all accounts in the specified OU. Any attempt to create or update EBS volumes or SQS queues through CloudFormation is validated first by the Hook. If encryption is not configured, the operation fails immediately.

Option C (SCP) blocks API calls globally, but SCPs cannot perform conditional logic based on resource properties passed by CloudFormation prior to creation. Option B (AWS Config) detects violations after resources already exist, which does not satisfy “before stack operation.” Option D (Lambda remediation) also occurs after the resource is created.

Thus, CloudFormation Hooks distributed via StackSets provide the only solution that enforces compliance before the provisioning lifecycle