DOP-C02 Exam Dumps : AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional

Only the Organizations management account (or roles in that account) can call organizations:CreateAccount directly. When moving the Lambda function to a different (dedicated) account, the correct pattern is to perform cross-account role assumption into a role that resides in the management account and has tightly scoped Organizations permissions.

Option A describes exactly this:

Create an IAM role in the management account with only the required Organizations permissions (for example, organizations:CreateAccount and related read permissions).

Configure the trust policy on that role to allow it to be assumed by the Lambda execution role in the new account.

Update the Lambda code to call sts:AssumeRole into the management-account role before invoking the Organizations API.

This approach ensures that:

The Lambda function can create new accounts, but only via the management account.

The Lambda execution role in the dedicated account has no direct Organizations permissions; it only has permission to assume the specific role.

Option B is incorrect because “delegated administration for Organizations” in the generic sense is not how CreateAccount is exposed; account creation remains a management-account responsibility. Options C and D either misconfigure trust or introduce unnecessary Control Tower complexity. Cross-account assume-role from the dedicated account into the management account is the correct and least-privilege solution.

 The correct solution is to create a new assertion safety rule in Route 53 ARC and apply it to the two routing controls. An assertion safety rule is a type of safety rule that ensures that a minimum number of routing controls are always enabled. The ATLEAST type of assertion safety rule specifies the minimum number of routing controls that must be enabled for the rule to evaluate as healthy. By setting the threshold to 1, the rule ensures that at least one routing control is always turned on. This prevents the scenario where both routing controls are accidentally turned off and the application becomes unavailable in both Regions.

The other solutions are incorrect because they do not use safety rules to prevent both routing controls from being turned off. A gating safety rule is a type of safety rule that prevents routing control state changes that violate the rule logic. The OR type of gating safety rule specifies that one or more routing controls must be enabled for the rule to evaluate as healthy. However, this rule does not prevent a user from turning off both routing controls manually. A resource set is a collection of resources that are tested for readiness by Route 53 ARC. A readiness check is a test that verifies that all the resources in a resource set are operational. However, these concepts are not related to routing control states or safety rules. Therefore, creating a new resource set and a new readiness check will not ensure that at least one routing control is turned on at all times. References:

Routing control in Amazon Route 53 Application Recovery Controller

Viewing and updating routing control states in Route 53 ARC

Creating a control panel in Route 53 ARC

Creating safety rules in Route 53 ARC

The best solution to implement failover for the application is to use CloudFront origin groups. Origin groups allow CloudFront to automatically switch to a secondary origin when the primary origin is unavailable or returns specific HTTP status codes that indicate a failure1. This way, CloudFront can serve the requests from the secondary ALB in the secondary Region without any delay or redirection. To set up origin groups, the DevOps engineer needs to create a new origin on the distribution for the secondary ALB, create a new origin group with the original ALB as the primary origin and the secondary ALB as the secondary origin, and configure the origin group to fail over for HTTP 5xx status codes. Then, the DevOps engineer needs to update the default behavior to use the origin group instead of the single origin2.

The other options are not as effective or efficient as the solution in option B. Option A is not suitable because creating a second CloudFront distribution will increase the complexity and cost of the application. Moreover, using Route 53 alias records with a failover policy will introduce some delay in detecting and switching to the secondary CloudFront distribution, which may not meet the zero-second RTO requirement. Option C is not feasible because CloudFront does not support using Route 53 alias records as origins3. Option D is not advisable because using a CloudFront function to redirect the requests to the secondary ALB will add an extra round-trip and latency to the failover process, which may also not meet the zero-second RTO requirement.

1: Optimizing high availability with CloudFront origin failover - Amazon CloudFront

2: Creating an origin group - Amazon CloudFront

3: Values That You Specify When You Create or Update a Web Distribution - Amazon CloudFront