Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To archive CloudWatch Logs to S3 with long-term retention, you need:

a streaming mechanism to move data from CloudWatch Logs to S3, and

an S3 Lifecycle policy to handle tiering and expiration.

Option B uses a CloudWatch Logs subscription filter that targets Amazon Data Firehose . Firehose provides managed, scalable streaming from CloudWatch Logs to S3 with optional buffering and transformation. This is the AWS-recommended pattern for exporting continuous log streams with minimal operational overhead. Option C is not valid because CloudWatch Logs subscription filters cannot directly target S3; they must target Kinesis, Firehose, or Lambda.

Once logs are in S3, the company wants to keep them rarely accessed after 90 days and retained for 10 years. Option D configures an S3 lifecycle policy to transition logs to S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval after 90 days, which is a low-cost archival tier with relatively fast access, and to expire (delete) logs after 3,650 days (10 years). This precisely matches the retention requirement.

Option E uses Reduced Redundancy, which is a legacy storage class and not optimized for long-term archival. Therefore, the correct combination is B and D .

 Modify the Build Stage to Add a Test Action with a RunOrder Value of 2:

The build stage in AWS CodePipeline can have multiple actions. By adding a test action with a runOrder value of 2, the test action will execute after the initial build action completes.

 Use AWS CodeBuild as the Action Provider to Run Unit Tests:

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages.

Using CodeBuild to run unit tests ensures that the tests are executed in a controlled environment and that only the code changes that pass the unit tests proceed to the deploy stage.

Example configuration in CodePipeline:

{

" name " : " BuildStage " ,

" actions " : [

{

" name " : " Build " ,

" actionTypeId " : {

" category " : " Build " ,

" owner " : " AWS " ,

" provider " : " CodeBuild " ,

" version " : " 1 "

},

" runOrder " : 1

},

{

" name " : " Test " ,

" actionTypeId " : {

" category " : " Test " ,

" owner " : " AWS " ,

" provider " : " CodeBuild " ,

" version " : " 1 "

},

" runOrder " : 2

}

]

}

By integrating the unit tests into the build stage and ensuring they run after the build process, the pipeline guarantees that only code changes passing all unit tests are deployed.

This is a classic AWS Organizations governance design:

Restrict Regions and allowed services across all accounts

The correct Organizations mechanism for account-wide guardrails is a Service Control Policy (SCP) .

SCPs set the maximum permissions that accounts/OUs can use, making them the right tool to enforce “only these Regions” and “only these services” consistently across the org.

Authentication from Active Directory + consistent job-function roles in every account

With AD as the identity source, the standard approach is federation to AWS using an IAM identity provider (SAML) and role assumption based on job function.

AWS CloudFormation StackSets is the operationally efficient way to deploy identical IAM roles/policies into multiple accounts/OUs so job-function permissions are consistent everywhere.

The roles’ trust policies can be configured to allow federated identities (from the AD-backed IdP) to assume the correct job role in each account.

Why the other options don’t fit:

A “OU with group policies” isn’t an AWS Organizations control mechanism for restricting Regions/services. The AWS-native control for this is SCPs , not “group policies.”

B Permissions boundaries are useful to limit what an IAM principal/role can do within an account , but they are not the org-wide enforcement mechanism for “all accounts must stay in these Regions / use only these services.” That’s what SCPs do.

C AWS RAM is for sharing resources (like subnets, Transit Gateway, etc.), not for “sharing roles” across accounts as a governance baseline. Also, the question emphasizes identical permissions in each account, which is best achieved by provisioning roles in each account (StackSets), not attempting to “share” roles.