Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To archive CloudWatch Logs to S3 with long-term retention, you need:

a streaming mechanism to move data from CloudWatch Logs to S3, and

an S3 Lifecycle policy to handle tiering and expiration.

Option B uses a CloudWatch Logs subscription filter that targets Amazon Data Firehose . Firehose provides managed, scalable streaming from CloudWatch Logs to S3 with optional buffering and transformation. This is the AWS-recommended pattern for exporting continuous log streams with minimal operational overhead. Option C is not valid because CloudWatch Logs subscription filters cannot directly target S3; they must target Kinesis, Firehose, or Lambda.

Once logs are in S3, the company wants to keep them rarely accessed after 90 days and retained for 10 years. Option D configures an S3 lifecycle policy to transition logs to S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval after 90 days, which is a low-cost archival tier with relatively fast access, and to expire (delete) logs after 3,650 days (10 years). This precisely matches the retention requirement.

Option E uses Reduced Redundancy, which is a legacy storage class and not optimized for long-term archival. Therefore, the correct combination is B and D .

The requirement is to automatically apply different baseline CloudFormation templates based on OU placement when new AWS accounts are created, while keeping operational overhead as low as possible. Because the company is already using AWS Organizations and is planning a comprehensive account management strategy, the most AWS-native and efficient solution is AWS Control Tower with Customizations for AWS Control Tower (CfCT) .

CfCT is specifically designed to extend Control Tower’s baseline by allowing administrators to deploy OU-scoped CloudFormation templates automatically. The solution uses a manifest file to map CloudFormation templates to specific OUs, ensuring that each new account receives the correct baseline configuration immediately after provisioning. Templates and configuration are stored in a version-controlled Git repository, providing auditability, change tracking, and rollback capabilities.

Option B adds unnecessary operational complexity by introducing a custom CodePipeline that must be manually triggered and maintained. This duplicates functionality that CfCT already provides natively. Options C and D rely on custom Lambda logic and EventBridge rules, which increase maintenance burden, reduce transparency, and lack built-in OU-aware governance features.

AWS documentation explicitly recommends Customizations for AWS Control Tower for OU-based, scalable, and automated baseline deployments. Therefore, Option A delivers the required functionality with the least operational overhead and aligns with AWS best practices for multi-account governance.

The latency in processing and ingesting logs can be caused by several factors, such as the throughput of the Kinesis data stream, the concurrency of the Lambda function, and the configuration of the event source mapping. To reduce the latency, the following steps can be taken:

Create a data stream consumer with enhanced fan-out. Set the Lambda function that processes the logs as the consumer. This will allow the Lambda function to receive records from the data stream with dedicated throughput of up to 2 MB per second per shard, independent of other consumers1. This will reduce the contention and delay in accessing the data stream.

Increase the ParallelizationFactor setting in the Lambda event source mapping. This will allow the Lambda service to invoke more instances of the function concurrently to process the records from the data stream2. This will increase the processing capacity and reduce the backlog of records in the data stream.

Configure reserved concurrency for the Lambda function that processes the logs. This will ensure that the function has enough concurrency available to handle the increased load from the data stream3. This will prevent the function from being throttled by the account-level concurrency limit.

The other options are not effective or may have negative impacts on the latency. Option D is not suitable because increasing the batch size in the Kinesis data stream will increase the amount of data that the Lambda function has to process in each invocation, which may increase the execution time and latency4. Option E is not advisable because turning off the ReportBatchItemFailures setting in the Lambda event source mapping will prevent the Lambda service from retrying the failed records, which may result in data loss. Option F is not necessary because increasing the number of shards in the Kinesis data stream will increase the throughput of the data stream, but it will not affect the processing speed of the Lambda function, which is the bottleneck in this scenario.

1: Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams - AWS Lambda

2: AWS Lambda event source mappings - AWS Lambda

3: Managing concurrency for a Lambda function - AWS Lambda

4: AWS Lambda function scaling - AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda event source mappings - AWS Lambda

Scaling Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with AWS CloudFormation - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams