Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

AWS Control Tower provides Account Factory and Account Factory Customizations (AFC) as the lowest-overhead and most scalable method for creating and configuring new accounts. AFC allows you to define blueprints that include mandatory baseline resources such as IAM roles, logging configurations, guardrails, network settings, and tagging standards. When accounts are created through Account Factory using a customization blueprint, all controls and baseline configurations are applied automatically during provisioning, without any additional automation steps or StackSet deployments.

Option B requires running StackSets after the account is created, which adds manual management overhead and defeats the built-in automation advantages of Control Tower. Options C and D rely on manually provisioning accounts via AWS Organizations, which bypasses Control Tower’s governance and would require custom Lambda or StackSet automation to replicate controls that Control Tower already provides automatically.

Because the question explicitly asks for the least operational overhead, the correct answer is to use the Control Tower AFC blueprint, ensuring every account is born compliant with the required guardrails and baseline configuration.

The most cost-effective solution to meet the RTO and RPO requirements is option B. This option involves copying the CloudFormation templates to an Amazon S3 bucket in the DR Region, configuring Aurora automated backup Cross-Region Replication, and configuring ECR Cross-Region Replication. In the event of a disaster, the CloudFormation template with the most recent Aurora snapshot and the Docker image from the local ECR repository can be used to launch a new CloudFormation stack in the DR Region. This approach avoids the need to build Docker images from the Dockerfile, which can sometimes take more than 2 hours, thus meeting the RTO requirement. Additionally, the use of automated backups and replication ensures that the RPO of 8 hours is met.

AWS Documentation on Disaster Recovery: Plan for Disaster Recovery (DR) - Reliability Pillar

AWS Blog on Establishing RPO and RTO Targets: Establishing RPO and RTO Targets for Cloud Applications

AWS Documentation on ECR Cross-Region Replication: Amazon ECR Cross-Region Replication

AWS Documentation on Aurora Cross-Region Replication: Replicating Amazon Aurora DB Clusters Across AWS Regions

To implement a more reliable deployment solution, a DevOps engineer should take the following actions:

Create a pipeline in AWS CodePipeline that uses the CodeCommit repository as a source provider. Configure pipeline stages that run the CodeBuild project in parallel to build and test the application. In the pipeline, pass the CodeBuild project output artifact to an AWS CodeDeploy action. This action will improve the deployment reliability by automating the entire process from code commit to deployment, reducing human errors and inconsistencies. By running the build and test stages in parallel, the pipeline can also speed up the delivery time and provide faster feedback. By using CodeDeploy as the deployment action, the pipeline can leverage the features of CodeDeploy, such as traffic shifting, health checks, rollback, and deployment configuration123

Create an AWS CodeDeploy application and a deployment group to deploy the packaged code to the EC2 instances. Configure the ALB for the deployment group. This action will improve the deployment reliability by using CodeDeploy to orchestrate the deployment across multiple EC2 instances behind an ALB. CodeDeploy can perform blue/green deployments or in-place deployments with traffic shifting, which can minimize downtime and reduce risks. CodeDeploy can also monitor the health of the instances during and after the deployment, and automatically roll back if any issues are detected. By configuring the ALB for the deployment group, CodeDeploy can register and deregister instances from the load balancer as needed, ensuring that only healthy instances receive traffic45

The other options are not correct because they do not improve the deployment reliability or follow best practices. Creating separate pipeline stages that run a CodeBuild project to build and then test the application is not a good option because it will increase the pipeline execution time and delay the feedback loop. Creating individual Lambda functions that use CodeDeploy instead of Systems Manager to run build, test, and deploy actions is not a valid option because it will add unnecessary complexity and cost to the solution. Lambda functions are not designed for long-running tasks such as building or deploying applications. Creating an Amazon S3 bucket and modifying the CodeBuild project to store the packages in the S3 bucket instead of in CodeArtifact is not a necessary option because it will not affect the deployment reliability. CodeArtifact is a secure, scalable, and cost-effective package management service that can store and share software packages for application development67

1: What is AWS CodePipeline? - AWS CodePipeline

2: Create a pipeline in AWS CodePipeline - AWS CodePipeline

3: Deploy an application with AWS CodeDeploy - AWS CodePipeline

4: What is AWS CodeDeploy? - AWS CodeDeploy

5: Configure an Application Load Balancer for your blue/green deployments - AWS CodeDeploy

6: What is AWS Lambda? - AWS Lambda

7: What is AWS CodeArtifact? - AWS CodeArtifact