ESG-Investing Questions Bank

Health and safety is a critical social factor for institutional investors as it impacts a company’s reputation, legal risks, and operational efficiency. (ESGTextBook[PallasCatFin], Chapter 4, Page 209)

ESG Analysis Scorecards:

Scorecards for ESG analysis are tools used by investors to evaluate and compare the ESG performance of companies, particularly when third-party research or scores are not available.

1. Applicability: Scorecards can be used for both public and private companies. They provide a structured framework for assessing ESG factors and can be tailored to the specific context and data availability of the companies being evaluated. Thus, they are not limited to public companies alone.

2. Purpose and Use: Scorecards are particularly useful when third-party ESG research or scores are unavailable. They enable investors to conduct their own ESG assessments based on the criteria and metrics they deem important. This is often the case for smaller companies, private companies, or in markets where ESG data coverage is limited.

3. Country-Level Assessments: Scorecards can also be adapted for country-level assessments of sovereign bonds, although this is less common. They can include criteria relevant to the ESG performance of countries, such as governance quality, environmental policies, and social indicators.

References from CFA ESG Investing:

ESG Scorecards: The CFA Institute highlights the use of ESG scorecards as a practical tool for investors to conduct their own assessments when external ESG ratings or research are not available. This enables a more tailored and flexible approach to ESG integration.

Applicability and Flexibility: The CFA curriculum discusses the versatility of scorecards in evaluating both corporate and sovereign issuers, underscoring their utility in various contexts.

In conclusion, scorecards for ESG analysis are most likely used when third-party research or scores are not available, making option B the verified answer.

=================

For general insurers, the financial impacts of climate change, such as the increasing frequency of natural disasters and regulatory changes, are a primary driver of ESG investment approaches. (ESGTextBook[PallasCatFin], Chapter 9, Page 494)

The principle that institutional investors should have a robust policy on managing conflicts of interest in relation to stewardship is not addressed in the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) Code.

UK Stewardship Code: This code includes principles that address monitoring investee companies (A), reporting periodically on stewardship and voting activities (B), and having robust policies on managing conflicts of interest in relation to stewardship (C).

EFAMA Code: While the EFAMA Code covers monitoring and reporting on stewardship activities, it does not explicitly address the need for a robust policy on managing conflicts of interest.

CFA ESG Investing References:

The CFA Institute’s resources on stewardship codes and principles provide a detailed comparison of various stewardship codes globally, including those by the UK and EFAMA. The UK Stewardship Code is noted for its comprehensive approach, including conflict of interest management, which is less emphasized in the EFAMA Code​​​​.

=================