Download Full Version SY0-701 CompTIA Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Tokenization is the most effective method for protecting sensitive data at rest within a database. Tokenization replaces sensitive information—such as credit card numbers, SSNs, or personal identifiers—with meaningless surrogate values (tokens). The actual data is stored securely in a separate token vault, reducing exposure if the primary database is compromised.

Hashing (A) is one-way and protects integrity, not usability, making it inappropriate for data that must later be retrieved. Masking (B) hides data from users but does not secure stored data in the database. Obfuscation (D) makes data harder to understand but is reversible and not intended for strong security.

Security+ SY0-701 identifies tokenization as a key control for data-at-rest protection, especially in regulated industries like finance and healthcare. It prevents attackers from accessing real data even if the database is breached, significantly reducing risk and compliance impact. This aligns with the exam’s emphasis on confidentiality and data protection strategies in stored environments.

The best answer is B. Providing an alternative security measure when standard remediation is not feasible.

A compensating control is a substitute safeguard used when the preferred or required control cannot be implemented immediately or at all. It helps reduce risk in another way until proper remediation is possible, or when direct remediation is impractical.

Examples include:

increasing monitoring when a system cannot be patched

segmenting a legacy application that cannot be upgraded

restricting access to a vulnerable system that must remain in service

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Reducing the attack surface by isolating vulnerable components within a segmented environmentThis can be an example of a compensating control, but it does not define the overall role as clearly as B.

C. Delaying remediation timelines by replacing affected systems in a maintenance windowThis describes scheduling or change timing, not compensating controls.

D. Remediating software flaws by modifying source code to remove insecure functionsThis is direct remediation, not a compensating control.

From the SY0-701 perspective, compensating controls are used when the ideal fix is not possible, so B is the best explanation.

Compensating controls are alternative security measures that are implemented when the primary controls are not feasible, cost-effective, or sufficient to mitigate the risk. In this case, the organization used compensating controls to protect the legacy system from potential attacks by disabling unneeded services and placing a firewall in front of it. This reduced the attack surface and the likelihood of exploitation.

The best answer is B. Updating default credentials and applying network segmentation.

IoT devices often present increased security risk because they may have weak default settings, limited security features, and persistent network connectivity. Two of the most effective ways to reduce this risk are:

Updating default credentialsMany IoT devices come with default usernames and passwords that are widely known or easy to guess. Leaving default credentials unchanged creates a major security weakness.

Applying network segmentationSegmenting IoT devices onto a separate network or VLAN limits their ability to interact with critical corporate systems. If one device is compromised, segmentation helps contain the threat and reduces lateral movement.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Assigning static IP addresses to the devicesStatic IP addresses may help with management and inventory, but they do not significantly reduce the core security risk.

C. Connecting the devices to the guest Wi-Fi to prevent interactions with corporate ITThis may seem helpful, but guest Wi-Fi is typically designed for temporary user access, not secured management of business IoT systems. It is not the best practice compared with a properly segmented and controlled IoT network.

D. Allowing the vendor to have remote access for day-to-day managementRoutine vendor remote access can increase risk if not tightly controlled. Third-party access should be limited, monitored, and secured, not broadly allowed as a default control.

From the SY0-701 perspective, IoT security commonly emphasizes changing insecure defaults, restricting access, segmentation, and reducing exposure. Therefore, B is the strongest and most complete answer.