A+ 220-1102 Passing Score

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Checking the hash value (such as MD5, SHA-1, or SHA-256) is the best way to verify file integrity after downloading. A hash function generates a unique string for a file. If even a single bit in the file is changed, the hash value will be different. Many software vendors provide hash values (checksums) on their websites to help users confirm that the files were downloaded without corruption or tampering.

A. Clear browsing data – Incorrect. Clearing browsing data does not affect downloaded files or their integrity.

B. Install SSL certificates – Incorrect. SSL certificates encrypt data transmission but do not verify the integrity of downloaded files.

D. Use trusted sources – While downloading files from trusted sources reduces the risk of corruption, it does not verify file integrity.

In change management, the scope of a project lists all the changes that are taking place. The scope ensures that all team members understand the boundaries and extent of the project, helping to prevent unexpected changes. Here’s a

Scope: Defines the project's boundaries and deliverables, including all the planned changes. It ensures that everyone involved understands what is included and excluded in the project, minimizing unexpected changes.

Risk analysis: Identifies potential risks and their impact but does not list the changes.

Rollback plan: Provides a strategy for reverting changes if something goes wrong but does not list changes.

Review: Involves evaluating changes but does not compile the list of changes.

Badge readers are devices that scan employee or visitor credentials, logging entries and exits from restricted areas. Video surveillance (B) provides a visual record but does not directly control access. Bollards (A) and fences (D) provide physical security but cannot detect or record access events.

To reduce the risk of brute force attacks, implementing multifactor authentication (MFA) is one of the most effective controls. MFA requires additional verification beyond a password, drastically lowering the chance of unauthorized access. Additionally, enforcing account lockouts after a set number of failed login attempts (e.g., five) limits brute force attempts by temporarily disabling accounts when suspicious activity occurs. While limiting access to internal destinations and blocking foreign login attempts can help, they are less reliable and can impact legitimate access. Replacing the remote tool or purchasing a password manager does not directly address brute force risks. These mitigation techniques are fundamental security practices emphasized in CompTIA A+ Core 2 Security domain.