33160X Exam Dumps : Avaya Workforce Engagement Support Certified Exam

According to the Avaya Contact Recorder Installation Guide, to have voice recording with Avaya Contact Recorder Advanced (ACRA), the data source type that Avaya Workforce Engagement requires is Phone. A phone data source defines the type of phone system that is being recorded, such as Avaya Aura Communication Manager, Avaya IP Office, or Avaya Communication Server 1000. A phone data source also specifies the connection details and recording parameters for the phone system. References: Avaya Contact Recorder Installation Guide

The Recorder Status Summary is a monitoring tool in the Recorder Manager that shows a visual update on how the Recorder and its components are working. It displays information such as:

• The status of the Recorder service, Capture service, Disk Manager service, and Database service.
• The number of active channels, active calls, and recorded calls.
• The disk space usage and availability for each partition.
• The CPU usage and memory usage for each service.
• The network bandwidth usage for each channel.
• The error logs and alerts for each component.

According to the Avaya Workforce Optimization Select Migration Guide, the side-by-side approach is a migration method that involves installing a new Avaya Workforce Engagement system on a separate set of servers, and then transferring the data and configurationfrom the existing AWFO system to the new system. Some of the factors that led to this recommendation are:

• B. It will support rollback by reverting to the 15.1 Data Center. The side-by-side approach allows the customer to keep their existing AWFO system intact and operational until they are ready to switch to the new Avaya Workforce Engagement system. This means that if there are any issues or problems with the new system, the customer can easily revert to the 15.1 Data Center by changing the DNS settings and restoring the database backups.
• C. It will minimize upgrade downtime risks. The side-by-side approach reduces the downtime risks associated with upgrading the system, as the customer can perform most of the migration steps in parallel with their normal operations. The customer can also schedule the final cutover to the new system at a convenient time, and avoid any disruption to their service levels or customer experience.

The statements A and D are incorrect because:

• A. It is suitable for small systems only. This is not true, as the side-by-side approach can be used for any size of system, depending on the customer’s preference and resources. The side-by-side approach may require more hardware and software licenses than the in-place approach, but it also offers more flexibility and reliability for the migration process.
• D. The data on the source DC servers are reformatted with Windows Server 2016, and installed with R20.X. This is not true, as this describes the in-place approach, not the side-by-side approach. The in-place approach is a migration method that involves upgrading the existing AWFO system on the same set of servers, and then applying the R20.X installation on top of it. The in-place approach requires reformatting the source DC servers with Windows Server 2016, which can result in data loss or corruption if not done properly. References: Avaya Workforce Optimization Select Migration Guide