Vce CISSP Questions Latest

The best way to minimize the risk of inheriting outsourcing contracts that do not adhere to the current security requirements is to verify all contracts before a merger occurs. This means that the security professionals involved in the merger should review and assess the security clauses, standards, and practices of the contracts of the merging parties, and identify any gaps, conflicts, or inconsistencies with the current security requirements. This can help to ensure that the outsourcing contracts are aligned with the security objectives, policies, and regulations of the merged organization, and that the security risks and responsibilities are clearly defined and agreed upon by all parties. Verifying all contracts before a merger occurs can also help to avoid any legal, financial, or operational issues that may arise from non-compliance or breach of contract. Defining additional security controls directly after the merger, including a procurement officer in the merger team, and assigning a compliance officer to review the merger conditions are all possible ways to minimize the risk of inheriting outsourcing contracts that do not adhere to the current security requirements, but they are not as effective as verifying all contracts before a merger occurs. Defining additional security controls directly after the merger may be too late, as the outsourcing contracts may already be in effect and may not be easily modified or terminated. Including a procurement officer in the merger team may be helpful, as the procurement officer can oversee the contracting process and ensure that the security requirements are met, but the procurement officer may not have the technical expertise or authority to verify the security clauses, standards, and practices of the contracts. Assigning a compliance officer to review the merger conditions may be useful, as the compliance officer can monitor and audit the compliance status and performance of the outsourcing contracts, but the compliance officer may not have the power or influence to change or enforce the security requirements of the contracts. 

Stateful firewalls differ from static packet filtering firewalls by being aware of the difference between a new and an established connection. A stateful firewall is a firewall that keeps track of the state of network connections and transactions, and uses this information to make filtering decisions. A stateful firewall maintains a state table that records the source and destination IP addresses, port numbers, protocols, and sequence numbers of each connection. A stateful firewall can distinguish between a new connection, which requires a three-way handshake to be completed, and an established connection, which has already completed the handshake and is ready to exchange data. A stateful firewall can also detect when a connection is terminated or idle, and remove it from the state table. A stateful firewall can provide more security and efficiency than a static packet filtering firewall, which only examines the header of each packet and compares it to a set of predefined rules. A static packet filtering firewall does not keep track of the state of connections, and cannot differentiate between new and established connections. A static packet filtering firewall may allow or block packets based on the source and destination IP addresses, port numbers, and protocols, but it cannot inspect the payload or the sequence numbers of the packets. A static packet filtering firewall may also be vulnerable to spoofing or flooding attacks, as it cannot verify the authenticity or validity of the packets. The other options are not aspects that stateful firewalls are aware of, but static packet filtering firewalls are not. Both types of firewalls can check the originating network location of the packets, but they cannot check the difference between a malicious and a benign packet payload, or the originating application session of the packets. References: Stateless vs Stateful Packet Filtering Firewalls - GeeksforGeeks; Stateful vs Stateless Firewall: Differences and Examples - Fortinet; Stateful Inspection Firewalls Explained - Palo Alto Networks.

Remote Access Tools (RAT) are malicious software that allow an attacker to remotely access and control a compromised host, often without the user’s knowledge or consent. RATs can be used to perform various malicious activities, such as stealing data, installing backdoors, executing commands, spying on the user, or spreading to other hosts. One of the main objectives of RATs is to maintain and expand control over the target network, by evading detection, hiding their presence, and creating persistence mechanisms. 

The most important part of an awareness and training plan to prepare employees for emergency situations is to design business continuity and disaster recovery training programs for different audiences. This means that the training content, format, frequency, and delivery methods should be tailored to the specific needs, roles, and responsibilities of the target audience, such as senior management, business unit managers, IT staff, recovery team members, or general employees. Different audiences may have different levels of awareness, knowledge, skills, and involvement in the business continuity and disaster recovery processes, and therefore require different types of training to ensure they are adequately prepared and informed. Designing business continuity and disaster recovery training programs for different audiences can help to increase the effectiveness, efficiency, and consistency of the training, as well as the engagement, motivation, and retention of the learners. Having emergency contacts established for the general employee population to get information, conducting business continuity and disaster recovery training for those who have a direct role in the recovery, and publishing a corporate business continuity and disaster recovery plan on the corporate website are all important parts of an awareness and training plan, but they are not as important as designing business continuity and disaster recovery training programs for different audiences. Having emergency contacts established for the general employee population to get information can help to provide timely and accurate communication and guidance during an emergency situation, but it does not necessarily prepare the employees for their roles and responsibilities before, during, and after the emergency. Conducting business continuity and disaster recovery training for those who have a direct role in the recovery can help to ensure that they are competent and confident to perform their tasks and duties in the event of a disruption, but it does not address the needs and expectations of other audiences who may also be affected by or involved in the business continuity and disaster recovery processes. Publishing a corporate business continuity and disaster recovery plan on the corporate website can help to make the plan accessible and transparent to the stakeholders, but it does not guarantee that the plan is understood, followed, or updated by the employees.