CCISO 712-50 Dumps PDF

 Handling Alert Fatigue in a SOC:Reducing false positives is a critical first step to enable the team to focus on genuine threats. It improves efficiency and reduces the chance of missing critical alerts.

 Steps to Take:

Analyze current alert data to identify patterns of false positives.

Adjust detection rules and thresholds to align with operational baselines.

Implement tools like SIEM for prioritization and correlation of alerts.

 Why Not Other Options:

Option A: Encouraging a reactive approach without addressing the root problem is ineffective.

Option C: Adding resources increases costs but does not solve the underlying issue.

Option D: Ignoring non-critical alerts may lead to missed threats.

 EC-Council Emphasis:Efficient alert management, as outlined in the CISO framework, ensures the SOC remains effective and proactive.

 Explanation:

Deploying the IPS in monitor mode first allows the SOC to assess its behavior and ensure it does not block legitimate traffic, addressing IT’s concerns about network availability.

Configuring the IPS to fail open ensures that in the event of a failure, the network remains operational.

 Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

A. Simply assert no network impact: This approach does not provide tangible reassurance or evidence to address concerns.

B. Fail open alone: Focusing only on the fail-open capability does not address IT’s concerns about testing or monitoring.

C. Accept responsibility for failure: While demonstrating accountability, this approach does not mitigate risks proactively.

 EC-Council CISO Reference:The curriculum emphasizes collaboration with IT teams and phased deployment strategies, such as using monitor mode, to ensure smooth implementation of new technologies without operational disruption.

 Why Involvement Is Critical:Involving business units ensures that controls are practical, aligned with operational needs, and less likely to face resistance. Collaborative design fosters ownership and compliance.

 Key Considerations:

Engagement leads to tailored controls that support business processes without undue burden.

Promotes alignment between security objectives and business requirements.

 Why Not Other Options:

Allowing business units to decide controls (A) may lead to inconsistent security practices.

Creating separate controls (B) can increase complexity and reduce uniformity.

Mandating controls with audit schedules (D) enforces compliance but does not promote acceptance.

 EC-Council CISO Alignment:Collaborative control design reflects a mature and inclusive approach to security management.

 Incident Response Process:EC-Council CISO emphasizes that security incidents, especially potential attacks, should immediately trigger the organization’s Incident Response (IR) process. This ensures a systematic, timely, and controlled reaction.

 Steps to Take:

Activate the IR process to triage the issue.

Confirm the vulnerability (cross-site scripting) and assess its potential impact.

Preserve evidence and log all activities for forensic and reporting purposes.

 Why Not Other Options:

Shutting down the server (A) may disrupt services unnecessarily and destroy critical evidence.

Contacting law enforcement (B) is premature without confirming the attack.

Analyzing the issue and providing a report (D) is part of the IR process but not the immediate next step.

 EC-Council CISO Guidance:Following a structured IR process minimizes chaos, ensures evidence preservation, and aligns with best practices in incident management.