All L4M5 Test Inside CIPS Questions

A BATNA provides the buyer with the confidence to walk away if terms are not favorable, ensuring they don’t settle for a suboptimal agreement. Knowing the best alternative enables buyers to negotiate from a position of strength, as per CIPS’s guidance on negotiation strategies.

As negotiations near closure, skilled negotiators carefully observe for buying signals—verbal cues (“That sounds reasonable…”) and non-verbal cues (nodding, smiling, leaning forward). These indicate readiness to agree and confirm whether it is the right time to close. At this stage, both sides usually stop gathering data or building rapport, as the focus is on confirming alignment and avoiding last-minute derailments. Closing too early may risk missing concessions, but delaying risks cooling momentum. Recognising buying signals ensures closure occurs at the optimal point, aligning with preparation and tactical awareness.

In integrative (win–win) negotiations, power is not used to dominate or coerce but to enable progress and overcome barriers. Power can help move negotiations forward when discussions stall on specific issues and can help address behavioural or attitudinal barriers that prevent collaboration. Maximising one side’s share of gains and coercion are characteristics of distributive or adversarial negotiations, not integrative ones. CIPS clearly differentiates the constructive use of power in integrative negotiations as a means to facilitate dialogue, encourage engagement, and unlock joint value, rather than to force submission or extract disproportionate gains.

Using threats is generally inappropriate in strategic supplier negotiations where a long-term, trust-based relationship is required (C). Threatening tactics can damage the relationship and may result in resistance from the supplier. CIPS advocates for collaborative approaches in strategic relationships to foster mutual trust and achieve sustainable agreements.