L4M5 Exam Dumps : Commercial Negotiation

BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) gives negotiators a fallback plan if discussions fail. It ensures they never accept worse terms than their minimum acceptable alternative. For Maria, developing a BATNA mitigates rejection risk, strengthens her bargaining power, and provides confidence. Without a BATNA, negotiators risk over-conceding or being locked into unfavourable deals. CIPS emphasises that BATNAs must be realistic, actionable, and aligned to organisational objectives—not merely theoretical alternatives.

The question asks about negotiation techniques which are not present in the book. In this question, there are only 3 recognised techniques:

- Framing and reframing: A frame is an assumption, or set of assumptions, that guides our attention and behavior. Reframing is the ability to identify and significantly change assumptions or perspectives. Framing has a significant impact on the effectiveness of negotiation outcomes and negotiator working relationships. You can read more on framing and reframing here.

- Anchoring: Anchoring bias is well-known cognitive bias in negotiation and in other contexts. The anchoring bias describes the common tendency to give too much weight to the first number put forth in a discussion and then inadequately adjust from that starting point, or the “anchor.” We even fixate on anchors when we know they are irrelevant to the discussion at hand. You can read more on anchoring here.

- Pacing and leading: Pacing and leading is a two-step lever of persuasion. First – You “match your pace” to the person you want to influence in as many ways as possible. You can do this by mimicking the way the person talks, stands, their appearance, etc. You can also mimic less tangible aspects like the way they act, or their emotional state. Second – Once you’ve set your pace with someone, lead them to whatever decision or behavior you want them to take! You can read more on pacing and leading here.

Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation.

LO 1, AC 1.1