PSPO-II Exam Dumps : Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II (PSPO 2)

The Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II (PSPO II) emphasizes the importance of a strategic approach to product management. According to the PSPO II resources, it is essential to:

Continually measure the impact of new investments or marketing efforts for both products (Option A). This aligns with the PSPO II focus on evidence-based management and making decisions based on empirical data.

Invest in Product A to increase its market share, customer satisfaction, and revenue (Option B). The PSPO II materials suggest that a product with a greater potential market but lower customer satisfaction requires attention to improve its standing and capitalize on its market potential.

Investigate an increase in marketing for Product B to grow its market share (Option C). Even though Product B is currently generating more revenue, the PSPO II guides recommend exploring opportunities to expand its market share, which could lead to even greater revenue.

Therefore, a comprehensive investment strategy that includes all the above actions is recommended for managing products with agility, as per the PSPO II guidelines. This approach ensures that both products are given the opportunity to maximize their market potential while maintaining a focus on customer satisfaction and revenue growth. It’s a holistic strategy that considers the different strengths and opportunities of each product.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In earlier versions of the Scrum Guide, theDaily Scrumwas structured around three specific questions:

What did I do yesterday?

What will I do today?

What impediments are blocking my progress?

However,the latest Scrum Guide (2020 and beyond) no longer prescribes these questions. Instead, it emphasizes that theDaily Scrum is an event for the Developers to inspect progress toward the Sprint Goal and adapt their plan as necessary.

Why the Answer is E (None of the Above):

Scrum no longer mandates specific questionsfor the Daily Scrum.

Thefocus is on progress toward the Sprint Goal, not on individual work tracking.

Developers decide how they structure the discussionto improve collaboration and planning.

Time spent (Option D) is not relevantto Scrum’s empirical approach, which values outcomes over effort tracking.

Key Scrum Guide Principles Supporting This Answer:

"The Developers can select whatever structure and techniques they want, as long as their Daily Scrum focuses on progress toward the Sprint Goal and produces an actionable plan for the next day of work."

"The Daily Scrum is not a status meeting; it is an event to inspect progress and adapt the Sprint Backlog as needed."

Conclusion:

The Scrum Guide doesnot require specific questionsat the Daily Scrum, makingOption E ("None of the above") the correct answer.

The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. They are also accountable for effective Product Backlog management, which includes clearly expressing Product Backlog items, ordering them to best achieve goals and missions, ensuring that the Product Backlog is transparent, visible andunderstood. The Product Owner may do the above work or may delegate the responsibility to others. However, the Product Owner remains accountable1.

When working with multiple Scrum Teams on the same product, the Product Owner should ensure that there is a shared understanding of the Product Goal among all the teams and stakeholders. The Product Goal is the long-term objective for the Scrum Team. They must fulfill (or abandon) one objective before taking on the next2. The Product Owner should also collaborate with the Developers to create and refine Product Backlog items that are valuable, feasible, and testable. The Developers are accountable for creating a plan for the Sprint, the Sprint Backlog1. The Product Owner should trust the Developers to self-organize and deliver the most valuable increments possible.

The other options are not recommended strategies for the Product Owner, as they may introduce unnecessary complexity, confusion, and waste. Adding component team Product Owners, enlisting the Program Management Office, or assigning sub-Product Owners may create silos, dependencies, and conflicts among the teams and stakeholders. These roles may also undermine the authority and accountability of the Product Owner, and reduce the transparency and alignment of the Product Backlog. The Product Owner should work with the Scrum Master and the Developers to find ways to optimize the value delivery and collaboration across the teams, rather than creating intermediaries or proxies34. References: 1: Scrum Guide 2: Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework 3: Managing Products with Agility 4: Evolving the Agile Organization