Free and Premium Scrum PSPO-II Dumps Questions Answers

Frequent product releases are beneficial for several reasons. They enable teams to inspect and adapt more frequently, which means they can get faster feedback, validate their assumptions, and improve their product incrementally. They help teams better understand and meet customer needs, which means they can deliver more value, increase customer satisfaction, and build trust and loyalty. They help teams to learn how to correct and eliminate errors, which means they can reduce waste, improve quality, and prevent technical debt. Smaller, more frequent releases are less risky, which means they can reduceuncertainty, avoid big-bang failures, and enable faster recovery123. References: 1: Managing Products with Agility 2: Understanding and Applyingthe Scrum Framework 3: Evolving the Agile Organization

According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II certification guide1, a Product Backlog is an ordered list of what is needed to improve the product. It is the single source of work undertaken by the Scrum Team. The Product Backlog is owned by the Product Owner, who is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. Therefore, a separate Product Backlog is needed for every product, not for every Scrum Team, portfolio, program, or all of the above. Multiple Scrum Teams can work on the same product and share the same Product Backlog2. A portfolio or a program may consist of multiple products, each with its own Product Backlog3. References: 1: Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification | Scrum.org 2: What is a Product Backlog? | Scrum.org 3: Product Backlog Explained [+ Examples] | Atlassian

The Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II (PSPO II) emphasizes the importance of a strategic approach to product management. According to the PSPO II resources, it is essential to:

Continually measure the impact of new investments or marketing efforts for both products (Option A). This aligns with the PSPO II focus on evidence-based management and making decisions based on empirical data.

Invest in Product A to increase its market share, customer satisfaction, and revenue (Option B). The PSPO II materials suggest that a product with a greater potential market but lower customer satisfaction requires attention to improve its standing and capitalize on its market potential.

Investigate an increase in marketing for Product B to grow its market share (Option C). Even though Product B is currently generating more revenue, the PSPO II guides recommend exploring opportunities to expand its market share, which could lead to even greater revenue.

Therefore, a comprehensive investment strategy that includes all the above actions is recommended for managing products with agility, as per the PSPO II guidelines. This approach ensures that both products are given the opportunity to maximize their market potential while maintaining a focus on customer satisfaction and revenue growth. It’s a holistic strategy that considers the different strengths and opportunities of each product.

D is correct because the timebox for the Sprint Review is four hours or less for a one-month Sprint, and usually shorter for shorter Sprints1. The Sprint Review is an event where the Scrum Team and the stakeholders inspect the outcome of the Sprint and collaborate on what to do next1. A is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not an open-ended event, but a timeboxed one that respects the attendees’ time and ensures productivity2. B is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not a point in time, but a timeboxed event that has a specific purpose and agenda1. C is incorrect because the Sprint Review is not the same asthe Daily Scrum, which is a 15-minute event for the Developers to synchronize their work1.

Sharing people with unique skills across multiple teams will likely result in teams having to wait more often for those people to be available, impeding the delivery of value. This is because those people will have to context-switch between different teams, products, anddomains, reducing their focus and efficiency1. Moreover, sharing people with unique skills will create bottlenecks and dependencies in the delivery process, increasing the risk of delays and quality issues2. Furthermore, sharing people with unique skills will discourageteams from developing deep technical skills themselves, making them less cross-functional and self-organizing3. Therefore, the best answer is A.

The other options are not correct because:

B. Teams do not have to develop deep technical skills. This is not a desirable condition, as it contradicts the Scrum value of commitment and the principle of continuous improvement. Teams should strive to develop deep technical skills to deliver high-quality products and to respond to changing requirements and technologies4.

C. Costs are lower since expensive resources are shared. This is not necessarily true, as the costs of context-switching, waiting, and quality issues may outweigh the benefits of sharing resources. Moreover, this option implies a resource-oriented mindset, rather than a value-oriented mindset, which is not aligned with the Scrum framework and the Product Owner role5.

D. More work gets done since people are better utilized. This is not a valid measure of success, as the amount of work done does not reflect the value delivered. Moreover, this option implies a utilization-oriented mindset, rather than an outcome-oriented mindset, which is not aligned with the Scrum framework and the Product Owner role. References: 1: Context Switching, 2: Bottlenecks and Dependencies, 3: Cross-Functional Teams, 4: Technical Excellence, 5: Resource vs. Value Orientation, : Utilization vs. Outcome Orientation

According to the PSPO II guide and Scrum.org competencies, when ordering Product Backlog items, a Product Owner should consider various factors to maximize the value of the work done by the Scrum Team. These factors include:

A. Dependencies to other products: Recognizing dependencies to other products is crucial for the Product Owner to ensure that the Scrum Team is working on items that can be completed and deliver value without being blocked by external dependencies.

B. Value of Product Backlog items: The primary role of a Product Owner is to maximize the value delivered by the Scrum Team, and ordering items based on their value is a fundamental aspect of this responsibility.

C. Dependencies between Product Backlog items: Understanding and managing dependencies between Product Backlog items helps in planning Sprints more effectively, ensuring that the team is working on items in a logical sequence.

D. Cost of delay: The cost of delay is a critical economic factor that influences the ordering of Product Backlog items. Items that would result in a higher cost if delayed should be prioritized.

E. Cost of implementation: While value maximization is the goal, the cost of implementation cannot be ignored. Balancing the cost and the expected value is essential for effective Product Backlog management.

These considerations are in line with the Scrum.org Professional Scrum competencies, particularly under 'Managing Products with Agility', where it's emphasized that Product Owners should have a deep understanding of market value, product feasibility, and the importance of making trade-offs to maximize value.

Let's analyze each option and determine the best course of action for a Product Owner in this situation, keeping in mind the PSPO II objectives and competencies:

C. Release when you can satisfy at least a single outcome, even though not all features are implemented.

Verification:This is thecorrectanswer.

Explanation and References:

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Product Value

This option aligns with the principle of maximizing value by delivering value early and often.

It emphasizes focusing on valuable outcomes rather than just completing a list of features.

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Business Strategy

Releasing a product increment that provides value allows for faster feedback and learning, which can inform future decisions and help to align the product with the overall business strategy.

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Stakeholders & Customers

While stakeholder management is important, focusing on delivering a valuable outcome is a better way to manage expectations and build trust in the long term.

Scrum Guide:The Scrum Guide emphasizes the importance of delivering a "Done", usable, and potentially releasable product Increment every Sprint. This aligns with the concept of releasing when a valuable outcome is achieved.

Additional Explanation:By focusing on outcomes, the Product Owner can prioritize the most valuable features that contribute to that outcome. This may mean that not all stakeholder requests are met in the initial release, but it allows for delivering value sooner and adapting based on feedback.

A. Wait until all essential features are complete before releasing the product.

Verification:This isincorrect.

Explanation and References:

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Product Value

This approach delays the realization of value and increases the risk of building the wrong thing.

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Forecasting & Release Planning

Waiting for all features delays feedback and learning, making it difficult to adapt the product to changing market conditions or user needs.

Scrum Guide:This contradicts the iterative and incremental nature of Scrum, where the goal is to deliver value frequently.

B. Pick the two most influential stakeholders and satisfy their needs, then release.

Verification:This isincorrect.

Explanation and References:

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Product Value

Prioritizing based on influence rather than value can lead to building the wrong product.

Professional Scrum Competency: Managing Products with Agility - Stakeholders & Customers

While stakeholder management is important, the Product Owner's primary responsibility is to maximize product value, not to cater to the most influential stakeholders.

Additional Explanation:This approach can damage trust with other stakeholders and create a political environment rather than a collaborative one.

D. Escalate to the steering committee to make the call.

Verification:This isincorrect.

Explanation and References:

Professional Scrum Competency: Evolving the Agile Organization - Portfolio Planning

The Product Owner is empowered to make decisions about the product and should not routinely escalate prioritization decisions.

Professional Scrum Competency: Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework - Applying the Scrum Framework - Self-Managing Teams

The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product. Escalating to a steering committee undermines this accountability.

Additional Explanation:This approach undermines the Product Owner's authority and can lead to delays and inefficient decision-making.

In conclusion, the best approach is to release when a valuable outcome can be achieved, even if not all requested features are implemented. This aligns with the principles of iterative development, value maximization, and frequent feedback, all of which are core to Scrum and emphasized in the PSPO II competencies.

B is correct because the Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product and the work of the Developers1, and delaying answers to the Developers can cause waste, rework, and missed opportunities2. E is correct because the Product Owneris responsible for ensuring that the product Increment is valuable and useful for thestakeholders and customers3, and this requires close collaboration and feedback with the Scrum Team and the users4. A is incorrect because the Product Owner does not need to dedicate 100% of their time to the Scrum Team, as they also have other accountabilities such as engaging with the market, managing the product vision, and aligning with the business strategy5. C is incorrect because the Product Owner is not a proxy for the stakeholders, and they should not delegate their role to business analysts or anyone else. D is incorrect because the Product Owner does not need the approval of the stakeholders to decide how much time they spend with the Scrum Team, as they are empowered to make the best decisions for the product. F is incorrect because the Product Owner should not base their time allocation on the complaints of the Developers, but on the value and quality of the product.

 A user satisfaction gap exists when there is a difference between what the user expects from a product or service and what the user actually experiences12. The user’s desired outcome is the goal or benefit that the user wants to achieve by using the product or service3. The user’s actual experience is the perception and evaluation of the product or service by the user4. If the user’s actual experience does not meet or exceed the user’s desiredoutcome, the user will be dissatisfied and may switch to a different product or service. References:

1: Identifying and Closing the Customer Satisfaction Gap

2: Find the Gaps in Your User Experience

3: [Outcome-Driven Innovation]

4: [User Experience]

: Measure Business Opportunities with Unrealized Value

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In earlier versions of the Scrum Guide, theDaily Scrumwas structured around three specific questions:

What did I do yesterday?

What will I do today?

What impediments are blocking my progress?

However,the latest Scrum Guide (2020 and beyond) no longer prescribes these questions. Instead, it emphasizes that theDaily Scrum is an event for the Developers to inspect progress toward the Sprint Goal and adapt their plan as necessary.

Why the Answer is E (None of the Above):

Scrum no longer mandates specific questionsfor the Daily Scrum.

Thefocus is on progress toward the Sprint Goal, not on individual work tracking.

Developers decide how they structure the discussionto improve collaboration and planning.

Time spent (Option D) is not relevantto Scrum’s empirical approach, which values outcomes over effort tracking.

Key Scrum Guide Principles Supporting This Answer:

"The Developers can select whatever structure and techniques they want, as long as their Daily Scrum focuses on progress toward the Sprint Goal and produces an actionable plan for the next day of work."

"The Daily Scrum is not a status meeting; it is an event to inspect progress and adapt the Sprint Backlog as needed."

Conclusion:

The Scrum Guide doesnot require specific questionsat the Daily Scrum, makingOption E ("None of the above") the correct answer.

As a Product Owner, you are accountable for maximizing the value of the product and the work of the Scrum Team. To do this, you need to have a clear understanding of the product vision, the product value, and the product backlog management. Measuring feature usage is one way to gather empirical evidence of the value delivered by the product and the feedback from the customers and users. This data can help you validate or invalidate your assumptions, prioritize the product backlog items, and inspect and adapt the product strategy. Therefore, measuring feature usage is not a waste of time, but a valuable practice for agile product management.

Moreover, as a Product Owner, you are also responsible for engaging with the stakeholders and customers, and providing them with transparency and openness. This means that you should share the data and the insights you gain from it with them, and invite them to collaborate with you and the Scrum Team. This can help you build trust and alignment, and foster a culture of experimentation and learning. Therefore, you should not hide the data or stop measuring it, but rather use it as a basis for constructive dialogue and decision making.

References:

Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification

Managing Products with Agility

Evidence-Based Management

Option B is the best answer because it reflects the agile and empirical nature of Scrum and Product Ownership. The Product Backlog is a living artifact that represents the current understanding of what the product needs to be most valuable for the customers and the stakeholders1. The Product Backlog is not a fixed or static document, but rather an emergent and dynamic one that adapts to the changing environment, needs, and feedback. The Product Owner is accountable for managing the Product Backlog and ensuring that it is transparent, ordered, and refined2. The Product Owner collaborates with the Scrum Team and the stakeholders to inspect and adapt the Product Backlog items based on the new insights, opportunities, and learnings that arise from the changing environment34. The Product Owner also uses various techniques, such as product vision, value proposition, user stories, experiments, and evidence-based management, to define, validate, and prioritize the Product Backlog items5 .

Option A is not the best answer because it contradicts the agile and empirical nature of Scrum and Product Ownership. The Product Backlog is not a requirements specification document, but rather a list of hypotheses and assumptions that need to be tested and validated in the real world5. The Product Backlog items are not detailed or fixed upfront, but rather refined and clarified as they get closer to implementation2. Updating the requirements specification document to ensure stability implies a plan-driven and predictive approach that does not embrace change and feedback, and that does not optimize value delivery.

Option C is not the best answer because it contradicts the agile and empirical nature of Scrum and Product Ownership. The Product Backlog is not a project plan, but rather a product roadmap that guides the development of the product. The Product Backlog does not have a predefined end date or scope, but rather evolves and changes as the product grows and matures1. Keeping the Product Backlog the same until the end of the project implies a plan-driven and predictive approach that does not embrace change and feedback, and that does not optimize value delivery.

Option D is not the best answer because it contradicts the agile and empirical nature of Scrum and Product Ownership. The Product Backlog is not a disposable artifact, but rather a cumulative and iterative one that builds on the previous work and learnings1. The Product Backlog items are not discarded or replaced, but rather refined and updated as the product evolves and changes2. Archiving the Product Backlog and creating a new one implies a disruptive and wasteful approach that does not leverage the existing knowledge and feedback, and that does not optimize value delivery.

References:

1: Product Backlog

2: Product Backlog Management

3: Empiricism

4: Stakeholders & Customers

5: Product Vision

: Product Value

: Evidence-Based Management

: [Agile Manifesto]

: [Product Roadmap]

: Product Owner Accountabilities

: Sprint Review

: Product Backlog Refinement

: [User Stories]

: [Value Proposition]

: [Experiments]

The Sprint Goal is a summary statement of the Sprint objective, which ideally has a cohesive theme. The Sprint Goal also gives the Scrum Team guidance and flexibility on how to achieve the objective. The Sprint Goal is crafted by the entire Scrum Team during the Sprint Planning, based on the Product Owner’s proposal of the most valuable Product Backlog items and the Development Team’s forecast of the work that can be done in the Sprint. The Product Owner collaborates with the team to write the Sprint Goal and defines it on the basis of the value being sought. The Product Owner does not define the scope or the solution for the Sprint, but rather the outcome and the benefit. The Product Owner also does not work with stakeholders to set the Sprint Goal, but rather represents their interests and needs. The Product Owner has a role in crafting the Sprint Goal, but not the sole responsibility for it. References:

Professional Scrum Product Owner II Assessment

Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework

Managing Products with Agility

The Role of the Product Owner during the Sprint

Sprint Goal – An Essential Ingredient in Scrum Recipe

To address the issues of interruptions, low-value meetings, and a lack of meaningful work, it is beneficial to consider a holistic approach that includes all the options provided. The Innovation Rate (A) can help understand the balance between new and routine work, the On-Product Index (B) can indicate how much work directly contributes to the product, and Employee Net Promoter Scores © can provide insights into employee satisfaction and loyalty. Together, these measurements can offer a comprehensive view of areas for improvement

The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. They are also accountable for effective Product Backlog management, which includes clearly expressing Product Backlog items, ordering them to best achieve goals and missions, ensuring that the Product Backlog is transparent, visible andunderstood. The Product Owner may do the above work or may delegate the responsibility to others. However, the Product Owner remains accountable1.

When working with multiple Scrum Teams on the same product, the Product Owner should ensure that there is a shared understanding of the Product Goal among all the teams and stakeholders. The Product Goal is the long-term objective for the Scrum Team. They must fulfill (or abandon) one objective before taking on the next2. The Product Owner should also collaborate with the Developers to create and refine Product Backlog items that are valuable, feasible, and testable. The Developers are accountable for creating a plan for the Sprint, the Sprint Backlog1. The Product Owner should trust the Developers to self-organize and deliver the most valuable increments possible.

The other options are not recommended strategies for the Product Owner, as they may introduce unnecessary complexity, confusion, and waste. Adding component team Product Owners, enlisting the Program Management Office, or assigning sub-Product Owners may create silos, dependencies, and conflicts among the teams and stakeholders. These roles may also undermine the authority and accountability of the Product Owner, and reduce the transparency and alignment of the Product Backlog. The Product Owner should work with the Scrum Master and the Developers to find ways to optimize the value delivery and collaboration across the teams, rather than creating intermediaries or proxies34. References: 1: Scrum Guide 2: Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework 3: Managing Products with Agility 4: Evolving the Agile Organization

Product Backlog involves the following activities12:

Reducing or eliminating dependencies between Product Backlog items. This helps to increase the flexibility and adaptability of the Product Backlog, and enables the Developers to select the most valuable and feasible items to work on in each Sprint3.

Reviewing the Product Backlog with stakeholders. This helps to ensure that the Product Backlog reflects the needs and expectations of the customers and users, and that the Product Owner receives feedback and input from various perspectives4.

Breaking large Product Backlog items into multiple smaller Product Backlog items. This helps to create a more granular and transparent Product Backlog, and allows the Product Owner to prioritize and refine the items more effectively5.

Ordering the Product Backlog. This helps to communicate the relative importance and urgency of the Product Backlog items, and guides the Developers to select the most valuable items for the next Sprint.

Forecasting the effort of Product Backlog items is not an activity that is explicitly required for managing a Product Backlog. The Product Owner is mainly responsible for maximizing the value of the product, not the effort or cost of development. The effort of Product Backlog items may be estimated by the Developers, but this is not a mandatory practice and it does not affect the ordering of the Product Backlog. References: 1: Product Backlog Management, 2: Managing Products with Agility, 3: Reducing Dependencies, 4: Reviewing theProduct Backlog, 5: Breaking Down Product Backlog Items, : Ordering the Product Backlog, : The Product Owner, : Estimating Product Backlog Items

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Scrum, theSprint Backlogis aliving artifactthat evolves throughout the Sprint as the team gains new insights. The responsibility ofupdating the Sprint Backlog lies exclusively with the Developers, as they are the ones executing the work.

Roles and Responsibilities:

Developers:

They are solely responsible for creating, managing, and updating the Sprint Backlog.

They continuously update it as they learn more about the work needed to achieve theSprint Goal.

Any changes, additions, or deletions to the Sprint Backlog are determined by the Developers based on new information.

Product Owner:

The Product Owner is responsible for managing theProduct Backlog, not the Sprint Backlog.

However, they collaborate with Developers if thescope of the Sprint Backlog needs renegotiation.

They prioritize product value but do not directly modify the Sprint Backlog.

Scrum Team:

The termScrum Teamincludes theDevelopers, Product Owner, and Scrum Master.

While they collaborate,only the Developers make changes to the Sprint Backlog.

Project Manager:

Scrum does not define a Project Manager role.

Traditional project management responsibilities are distributed across theScrum roles.

TheDevelopers are self-organizing, meaning they do not need external direction to update their plan.

Key Scrum Guide Principles Supporting This:

The Sprint Backlog isa plan by and for the Developers.

The Developersown and manage their workthroughout the Sprint.

The Sprint Backlog isadapted dailyto reflect progress toward the Sprint Goal.

No one else, including the Product Owner or Scrum Master, is allowed to modify the Sprint Backlog.

Conclusion:

Only theDevelopershave the authority to update the Sprint Backlog during a Sprint. This ensures that they maintain ownership of their work and adapt as necessary to successfully achieve theSprint Goal.

Unrealized Value is the value that could be realized by meeting all potential needs of the customer or user1. It represents the opportunity for growth and innovation. When the Unrealized Value of a product is very small, it means that the product has reached a saturation point in the market, and there is little room for improvement or differentiation. Investing more in such a product would not yield much return, and might even cannibalize the Current Value of the product, which is the value delivered to the customer or user today1. Therefore, organizations should reduce their investment in a product when its Unrealized Value is very small, and focus on other products or opportunities that have higher Unrealized Value

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario describes a product withlow Current Valueandhigh Unrealized Value, meaning that while the product is not currently delivering significant value, there is potential for substantial improvement.

Additionally:

A high product cost ratio (85%)means that a large portion of revenue is being consumed by operating costs, leaving little room for new development.

A long time-to-marketsuggests inefficiencies in the development and delivery process, preventing rapid iteration and improvement.

Given these conditions, thebest long-term strategy is to address the underlying inefficiencies before attempting to innovate.

Analysis of Answer Choices:

Option A: Drop the product(Incorrect)

Abandoning the product is premature, as theUnrealized Value is high.

High Unrealized Value indicates potential customer demand or market opportunity that has not yet been tapped.

A Product Owner should first explore ways to unlock that value before considering discontinuation.

Option B: Improve efficiency by eliminating waste(Correct)

Addressing inefficiencies inproduct development, delivery, and cost structureis a fundamental step before attempting new innovations.

By reducing waste, improving operational efficiency, and lowering costs, the teamcan free up resources to invest in new high-value features.

Scrum and Agile emphasize continuous improvement—optimizing processes enables faster, more cost-effective feature development in the future.

Option C: Focus on high-value features despite inefficiencies(Incorrect)

While prioritizing high-value features is important, thelack of capacity and long time-to-marketwould limit the effectiveness of this strategy.

Without firstimproving efficiency, the product will continue to struggle with slow delivery, high costs, and missed opportunities.

Key Scrum and Agile Principles Supporting This Answer:

Continuous Improvement: Scrum promotes regularinspection and adaptationto optimize processes and eliminate waste.

Sustainable Development: Focusing on long-term product viability requiresfixing systemic inefficienciesbefore pursuing new growth.

Empirical Process Control: Decisions should be based on data; the data here suggests inefficiencies are a major blocker to success.

Conclusion:

Thebest approach is to first improve efficiency by eliminating waste, reducing costs, and accelerating time-to-market. Once the team has built a solid foundation, they can thenfocus on innovation and unlocking the Unrealized Value of the product.

The Product Backlog is an ordered list of what is needed to improve the product, and it is the single source of work undertaken by the Scrum Team. The Product Owner is responsible for ordering the Product Backlog items by value, risk, priority, and dependencies. The Product Backlog should be transparent and accessible to the Scrum Team and the stakeholders, so that everyone can understand the scope and progress of the product development. Therefore, options A and B are true statements about the Product Backlog.

Option C is not true because the Product Backlog items can be expressed in various formats, such as user stories, use cases, scenarios, or any other way that clearly conveys the intent and value of the item. User stories are a common and useful technique, but not a mandatory one.

Option D is not true because the Product Backlog is not a fixed and complete specification of the product, but rather an emergent and dynamic artifact that evolves over time. The Product Backlog items are refined and clarified by the Product Owner and the Developers throughout the product development process, and new items can be added or removed as needed. The Product Backlog does not need to be fully defined before the first Sprint begins, but only enough to support the first Sprint Planning.

Option E is not true because the Product Owner is not the only source of ideas and requirements for the product. The Product Owner collaborates with the Developers and the stakeholders to discover, validate, and prioritize the Product Backlog items. The Product Owner may delegate the authority to add items to the Product Backlog to others, but remains accountable for the ordering and the value of the Product Backlog.

Option F is not true because the Product Backlog does not replace the communication and collaboration between the Developers and the stakeholders. The Product Backlog represents the input of all stakeholders, but it is not a substitute for direct feedback and interaction. The Developers need to engage with the stakeholders to understand their needs, expectations, and feedback, and to deliver a valuable product increment that meets the Sprint Goal and the Definition of Done. References:

Professional Scrum Product Owner II Assessment

Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework

Managing Products with Agility

[What is a Product Backlog?]

[Product Backlog Explained]

 According to the Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II certification guide1, the Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. This means that the Product Owner should have a clear vision of the product, understand the needs and desires of the customers and stakeholders, and prioritize the Product Backlog items based on their value and urgency. The Product Owner should also use evidence-based management to measure the value delivered by the product and make informed decisions about the product strategy and direction.

In this question, Product A has a high current value, which means that it is generating a lot of revenue and satisfying the existing customers. However, it also has a low unrealized value, which means that it has little room for improvement or innovation, and may face competition or obsolescence in the future. Product B has a low current value, which means that it is not generating much revenue or satisfying many customers. However, it also has a high unrealized value, which means that it has a lot of potential for improvement or innovation, and may capture new markets or opportunities in the future.

Taking a long-term view, the Product Owner should weight the investment toward Product B, since it has more potential to deliver value in the future. This does not mean that the Product Owner should neglect Product A, but rather balance the investment between the two products based on the expected return on investment and the risk involved. Investing equally in both products may not be optimal, as it may result in underinvesting in Product B and overinvesting in Product A. Weighting the investment toward Product A may not be wise, as it may result in missing out on the opportunities offered by Product B and losing the competitive edge in the market.

References: 1: Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification | Scrum.org

A sprint forecast is an estimate of what can be achieved in an upcoming Sprint. During Sprint planning, the team reviews the Product Backlog and selects stories that can be completed in the next Sprint based on the team’s velocity and capacity. The forecast is a pragmatic commitment to a realistic amount of work1. The forecast helps the team plan their tasks, prioritize their goals, and set realistic expectations for what they can accomplish during the Sprint. It also helps them to identify any potential risks or issues that could arise during the course of the Sprint2. The forecast is not a guarantee or a promise, but rather a best guess based on the current information and assumptions3. The forecast can be updated during the Sprint as new information emerges or as the team learns from their work4. The forecast is a useful tool for the Product Owner to communicate with the stakeholders about the progress and the value delivered by the team.

Option A is the best answer because it reflects the agile and empirical nature of Scrum and Product Ownership. The Product Vision is a concise and inspiring statement that describes the purpose, direction, and value proposition of the product1. The Product Vision is not a fixed or static document, but rather an emergent and dynamic one that adapts to the changing environment, needs, and feedback. The Product Owner is accountable for creating and communicating the Product Vision to the Scrum Team and the stakeholders2. The Product Owner collaborates with the Scrum Team and the stakeholders to inspect and adapt the Product Vision based on the new insights, opportunities, and learnings that arise from the changing environment34. The Product Owner also uses various techniques, such as product discovery, user research, market analysis, and experiments, to validate and refine the Product Vision5 .

Option B is not the best answer because it contradicts the accountability of the Product Owner. The Product Owner is the sole person responsible for managing the Product Backlog and maximizing the value of the product and the work of the Scrum Team. The Product Owner is also the sole person responsible for creating and communicating the Product Vision to the Scrum Team and the stakeholders2. The Product Owner may seek input and feedback from the Scrum Team and the stakeholders, but the final decision and authority on the Product Vision belongs to the Product Owner. The Scrum Team and the stakeholders are not accountable for developing and evolving the Product Vision, but they are expected to understand and support it .

Option C is not the best answer because it contradicts the reality and complexity of product development. The Product Vision is not a technical specification, but rather a strategic and business-oriented statement that guides the development of the product1. The Product Vision does not prescribe how the product should be built, but rather why and what the product should achieve. However, the Product Vision is not completely detached from the technical aspects of the product, as the technology choices may have an impact on the feasibility, desirability, and viability of the product. The Product Owner should be aware of the strategic technology choices and their implications, and discuss them with the Development Team and the stakeholders, as part of the product discovery and validation process .

References:

1: Product Vision

2: Product Owner Accountabilities

3: Empiricism

4: Stakeholders & Customers

5: Product Discovery

: Product Backlog Management

: The Scrum Guide

: Scrum Team

: Product Value

: Product Feasibility

: Product Validation

: [Agile Manifesto]

: [User Research]

: [Market Analysis]

: [Experiments]

 The Scrum framework encourages the delegation of tasks to promote team ownership and efficiency. Delegating tasks like detailing Product Backlog items, interviewing users, and analyzing data to Developers allows the Product Owner to focus on value maximization and leverage the skills of the Developers12. This approach aligns with the Scrum principle of self-organization and empowerment of the Development Team.