Spring Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor
Exam Name:
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
418
Last Updated:
May 20, 2026
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor: ISO 27001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice exam demo.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

Scenario 5: Cobt. an insurance company in London, offers various commercial, industrial, and life insurance solutions. In recent years, the number of Cobt's clients has increased enormously. Having a huge amount of data to process, the company decided that certifying against ISO/IEC 27001 would bring many benefits to securing information and show its commitment to continual improvement. While the company was well-versed in conducting regular risk assessments, implementing an ISMS brought major changes to its daily operations. During the risk assessment process, a risk was identified where significant defects occurred without being detected or prevented by the organizations internal control mechanisms.

The company followed a methodology to implement the ISMS and had an operational ISMS in place after only a few months After successfully implementing the ISMS, Cobt applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification Sarah, an experienced auditor, was assigned to the audit Upon thoroughly analyzing the audit offer, Sarah accepted her responsibilities as an audit team leader and immediately started to obtain general information about Cobt She established the audit criteria and objective, planned the audit, and assigned the audit team members' responsibilities.

Sarah acknowledged that although Cobt has expanded significantly by offering diverse commercial and insurance solutions, it still relies on some manual processes Therefore, her initial focus was to gather information on how the company manages its information security risks Sarah contacted Cobt's representatives to request access to information related to risk management for the off-site review, as initially agreed upon for part of the audit However, Cobt later refused, claiming that such information is too sensitive to be accessed outside of the company This refusal raised concerns about the audit's feasibility, particularly regarding the availability and cooperation of the auditee and access to evidence Moreover, Cobt raised concerns about the audit schedule, stating that it does not properly reflect the recent changes the company made It pointed out that the actions to be performed during the audit apply only to the initial scope and do not encompass the latest changes made in the audit scope

Sarah also evaluated the materiality of the situation, considering the significance of the information denied for the audit objectives. In this case, the refusal by Cobt raised questions about the completeness of the audit and its ability to provide reasonable assurance. Following these situations, Sarah decided to withdraw from the audit before a certification agreement was signed and communicated her decision to Cobt and the certification body. This decision was made to ensure adherence to audit principles and maintain transparency, highlighting her commitment to consistently upholding these principles.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Question:

Based on the role of Sarah described in Scenario 5, which of the following should NOT be part of her responsibilities?

Options:

A.

Assigning responsibilities to the audit team members

B.

Defining the audit criteria and objectives

C.

Planning the audit

Buy Now
Question 2

The data center at which you work is currently seeking ISO/IEC27001:2022 certification. In preparation for your initial certification visit a number of internal audits have been carried out by a colleague working at another data centre within your Group. They secured their ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate earlier in the year.

You have just qualified as an Internal ISMS auditor and your manager has asked you to review the audit process and audit findings as a final check before the external Certrfication Body arrives.

Which six of the following would cause you concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements?

Options:

A.

The audit programme shows management reviews taking place at irregular intervals during the year

B.

Audit reports are not held in hardcopy (i.e. on paper). They are only stored as ".POF documents on the organisation's intranet

C.

The audit programme does not take into account the relative importance of information security processes

D.

The audit programme mandates auditors must be independent of the areas they audit in order to satisfy the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022

E.

Although the scope for each internal audit has been defined, there are no audit criteria defined for the audits carried out to date

F.

Audit reports to date have used key performance indicator information to focus solely on the efficiency of ISMS processes

G.

The audit programme does not reference audit methods or audit responsibilities

Question 3

As the ISMS audit team leader, you are conducting a second-party audit of an international logistics organisation on behalf of an online retailer. During the audit, one of your team members reports a nonconformity relating to control 5.18 (Access rights) of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The control was justified in the Statement of Applicability. She found evidence that removing the server access protocols of 20 people who left in the last 3 months took up to 1 week whereas the policy required removing access within 24 hours of their departure.

Select the three most appropriate actions taken by the auditee to deal with this situation.

Options:

A.

Extend the required removal period from 24 hours to 7 days

B.

Change the process to ensure that leaver access protocols are removed before personnel leaves the premises

C.

Employee more IT personnel to ensure that the specified timescale can be met.

D.

Ensure that removing the server access protocols of leavers from senior management positions is prioritised

E.

Investigate whether the delays in removing access protocols caused any security breaches

F.

Monitor the ongoing process of removing leaver access protocols to determine whether it meets requirements

G.

Reprimand the IT team for failing to remove the access protocols in the required timescale