Exin SIAMP Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Strategic Objectives Alignment:Demonstrating alignment with corporate strategic objectives is crucial for gaining board approval for the SIAM business case.

Headcount Control:One of the primary benefits of SIAM is optimizing resources, which includes controlling headcount by reducing the need for extensive internal service integration capabilities.

External Service Integration:Given that there is no appetite from the Board for using ZYX staff for service integration, leveraging external capabilities aligns with the objective of controlling headcount.

Contract Delivery:While ensuring delivery against contracts is important, SIAM’s contribution to headcount control is more direct and measurable.

Investment in People and Business Retention:While SIAM can contribute to these areas, the most immediate and significant impact is on controlling headcount through efficient external service integration.

References:

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on SIAM Business Case Development

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Strategic Alignment Sections

 Introduction:

This question is about identifying the factor that will most influence the choice of the SIAM structure for ZYX.

Different factors can significantly impact the design and implementation of a SIAM model.

 Analyzing the Options:

Option A:

Focuses on the capabilities of the staff working in ZYX organizations.

Important for operational effectiveness but not the primary driver for SIAM structure.

Option B:

Highlights the multiple geographical locations of ZYX companies.

Managing services across various locations is crucial for ensuring consistency and integration.

 Understanding the Scenario:

ZYX wants to minimize risks to service availability by using four different providers forhosting in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, and Australia.

Each application will be hosted by three different providers to ensure resilience.

The CEO aims for rapid introduction of new services, low costs for the service integrator, and simplified contract drafting.

 Analyzing the Options:

Option A:Adopting the same structure for all hosting provider contracts might reduce complexity but doesn’t address the requirement for a single contract structure.

Option C:Custom structures for each hosting provider contract would complicate the contract drafting process, going against the legal team’s preference.

Option D:Allowing hosting providers to provide their own structure would lead to inconsistencies and difficulties in managing multiple contracts.

 Selecting the Optimal Approach:

Option B:Adopting a single structure for all hosting provider contracts ensures consistency, simplifies the management process, and aligns with the legal team's requirement to avoid complexity in contract drafting. It also supports rapid service introduction and cost efficiency by streamlining contract management.

 Justification:

A single contract structure facilitates easier management and integration across different providers, which is critical for maintaining service resilience and availability.

This approach aligns with SIAM principles of consistent and streamlined service integration and management​​​​.