Vce HPE7-A02 Questions Latest

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

The requirement is to permit HTTPS traffic from clients to the 10.2.12.0/24 subnet.

ZoneC is configured to drop all HTTPS traffic to the 10.2.0.0/16 subnet. Therefore, the first match in the zoneC class (priority 10) will drop the desired traffic.

To override this behavior, you must add a higher-priority rule (lower rule number) to zoneC that explicitly matches 10.2.12.0/24 and permits the traffic.

Thus, adding the rule 5 match any 10.2.12.0/24 eq https to zoneC ensures the desired traffic is permitted while maintaining the drop behavior for the rest of 10.2.0.0/16.

References

AOS-CX Role-Based Access Control documentation.

Understanding class priority and policy rule ordering in AOS-CX.

For a company that wants to apply a standard configuration to all AOS-CX switch ports and dynamically adjust their configuration based on the identity of the user or device that connects, the best approach is to have the switches download user-roles from HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). This method centralizes the configuration of identity-based settings in CPPM, allowing it to dynamically assign roles and policies to switch ports based on authentication and authorization results. This ensures consistent and secure network access control tailored to each user or device.

Packet Capture in Aruba Central:

Aruba Central provides tools for remote packet captures directly from the APs.

On the "Security" page for the AP, you can initiate a packet capture session, specifying the client device and capture duration.

The traffic is captured into a PCAP file, which can be downloaded and analyzed using tools like Wireshark.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. While possible via CLI, Aruba Central provides a simpler method for packet captures.

Option B: Correct. Aruba Central’s "Security" page allows you to capture and export client traffic efficiently.

Option C: Incorrect. The "Live Events" page focuses on monitoring events, not packet captures.

Option D: Incorrect. Port mirroring on the switch captures AP traffic but requires more manual configuration and does not isolate client-specific wireless traffic easily.

Policy Analysis:

Rule Evaluation Order: Rules are applied in sequential order until a match is found.

Key Points:

DHCP traffic (UDP 67) is permitted.

DNS traffic (UDP 53) is permitted.

Traffic to 10.5.5.0/24 is explicitly denied.

HTTP traffic (TCP 80) is allowed only to 10.5.0.0/16.

HTTPS traffic (TCP 443) is allowed only to 10.5.0.0/16.

All other traffic to 10.5.0.0/16 is denied.

Any other traffic not matching the above rules is permitted.

Scenario Analysis:

The client IP 10.2.2.2 does not fall within the 10.5.0.0/16 subnet.

Rule 3 denies traffic to 10.5.5.5, regardless of the source IP.

Option A: Correct. HTTPS traffic to 10.5.5.5 is explicitly denied by Rule 3.

Option B: Incorrect. Traffic to 203.0.113.12 is permitted due to the final "permit any" rule.

Option C: Incorrect. The client (10.2.2.2) does not belong to the subnet 10.5.0.0/16, so traffic to 10.5.3.3 is not permitted by Rule 5.

Option D: Incorrect. HTTP traffic to 198.51.100.12 is allowed by the last "permit any" rule.