HP Certification HPE7-A02 Exam Questions and Answers PDF

RADIUS Accounting:

RADIUS accounting enables network devices to report client session details (e.g., IP addresses, session duration, bandwidth usage) to CPPM.

Interim updates ensure CPPM receives ongoing updates about the client’s session, enabling accurate tracking.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Syslog logging sends general system logs, not client session details.

Option B: Incorrect. Dynamic authorization (CoA) handles session changes but does not provide usage tracking.

Option C: Correct. RADIUS accounting with interim updates tracks client IP addresses and bandwidth utilization.

Option D: Incorrect. IF-MAP interfaces are used for metadata sharing, not for RADIUS-based tracking.

For a company that lacks visibility into various types of user and IoT devices on its internal network, HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI) is the recommended solution. CPDI provides comprehensive visibility and profiling of all devices connected to the network. It uses machine learning and AI to identify and classify devices, offering detailed insights into their behavior and characteristics. This enhanced visibility enables the security team to effectively monitor and manage network devices, improving overall network security and compliance.

Installing Agents for SSE (Secure Service Edge):

Agents installed on remote users' devices allow posture checks (e.g., antivirus status, OS version) to ensure compliance.

Based on the results of the posture checks, different permissions and security policies can be applied dynamically.

This improves the security posture of remote users before granting access to resources.

Option A: Correct. Agents enable posture checks and enforce conditional access based on compliance.

Option B: Incorrect. Admins manage SSE policies centrally, not via agents.

Option C: Incorrect. Access to private servers via SSH does not require agents; it relies on policies and tunnels.

Option D: Incorrect. Local sandboxing is generally a function of endpoint protection solutions, not SSE agents.

Rogue AP Containment Methods:

HPE Aruba Networking recommends using wireless deauthentication as the preferred method for rogue AP containment.

Deauthentication sends deauth frames to clients connected to rogue APs, causing them to disconnect. This method is effective without introducing unnecessary disruptions to the wired infrastructure.

Key Points:

Wireless Deauthentication is simple, efficient, and widely supported across client devices.

Tarpit Containment is more aggressive and may cause unintentional disruptions to legitimate clients.

Wired Containment involves blocking traffic at the switch level but is complex and may impact legitimate infrastructure traffic.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. Wireless deauthentication is the recommended method as it targets rogue AP clients without excessive network impact.

Option B: Incorrect. Combining wireless tarpit and wired containment is overkill and not typically recommended.

Option C: Incorrect. Wireless tarpit can be effective but is generally not the first choice due to its aggressive nature.

Option D: Incorrect. Wired containment is more complex and reserved for specific use cases, not general recommendations.