Salesforce Developer Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Exam Questions and Answers PDF

Refreshing a sandbox during the release preview window to ensure they have the upcoming release is a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it allows them to test their application in an environment that matches the production environment after the upgrade. Running regression tests in an upgraded sandbox to detect any issues with the upgrade is also a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it helps them to verify that the existing functionality is not affected by the new features or changes introduced by the upgrade. Reviewing the release notes for automatically-enabled features and technical debt is also a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it helps them to understand the impact and benefits of the new features or changes, as well as to identify and resolve any technical debt that may cause issues or conflicts with the upgrade. Contacting Salesforce to schedule a time to upgrade the full sandbox is not a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it is not possible to request a specific time for the upgrade of the full sandbox, which is determined by Salesforce and depends on the release window and the pod assignment. Upgrading any SOAP integrations to the newest WSDL as early as possible is not a step that the team at UC should take to prepare for the new Salesforce release, as it is not necessary to upgrade the SOAP integrations to the newest WSDL, unless they want to use the new features or fields introduced by the upgrade. The SOAP integrations will continue to work with the previous WSDL versions, as they are backward compatible.

The best practices to support UC’s new package development strategy are to test developed packages in test environments before installing to production, and to consult the metadata coverage report to identify features supported by packages. Testing packages in test environments can help to ensure the quality and functionality of the packages, as well as to identify and resolve any issues or dependencies before deploying to production. Consulting the metadata coverage report can help to determine which features can be included in packages, and which ones need to be deployed using other methods. Version control still needs to be used, as packages do not manage all the code and configuration, but only the components that are part of the package. Moving everything in the existing codebase to a single monolithic package is not a good practice, as it reduces the modularity, maintainability, and reusability of the code. It is better to create smaller packages that are focused on specific features or functionalities.

 B and D are the correct answers, as Force.com IDE and Force.com Migration Tool are the deployment tools that will support the request of creating a new custom object to track Shipping Containers and making it available globally by all Salesforce instances and further maintained and modified regionally by local administrators. Force.com IDE and Force.com Migration Tool are both tools that use the Metadata API to retrieve and deploy metadata components, such as custom objects, from one org to another. They also allow for selective deployment, meaning that only the components that are needed can be deployed, without affecting the rest of the org. A is incorrect, as Tooling API is not a deployment tool, but an API that provides access to metadata and code, as well as customizing and automating the development process. C is incorrect, as Change sets are not a deployment tool that will support the request, as they are limited to deploying components between connected orgs, and do not allow for selective deployment or regional modifications. You can learn more about these tools in the Deploy Changes with the Force.com Migration Tool and Deploy Changes with the Force.com IDE units on Trailhead.

Waterfall development methodology has some positive aspects, such as:

Complex processes that will need to be built are thoroughly understood and documented before coding begins, which can reduce the risk of ambiguity and rework.

Milestones, timelines and estimates tend to be more accurate and predictable due to the upfront due diligence, which can help with project management and stakeholder expectations.