SAA-C03 VCE Exam Download

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a disaster recovery solution for FSx for NetApp ONTAP in a secondary region, accessible using the same protocols (CIFS and NFS).

Analysis of Options:

Lambda Function and S3: Involves copying data to S3, which changes the access protocols and increases operational overhead.

AWS Backup: Suitable for backup and restore but not for real-time or near-real-time replication for disaster recovery.

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: SnapMirror provides efficient replication between ONTAP instances, maintaining access protocols and requiring minimal operational overhead.

Amazon EFS: Does not support CIFS and requires migrating data, increasing complexity and changing access protocols.

Best Solution:

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: This solution ensures seamless disaster recovery with the same access protocols and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The application needs to write to multiple block storage volumes in multiple EC2 Nitro-based instances simultaneously to achieve higher availability.

Analysis of Options:

General Purpose SSD (gp3) with Multi-Attach: Supports Multi-Attach but does not provide the highest performance required for critical applications.

Throughput Optimized HDD (st1) with Multi-Attach: Not suitable for applications requiring high performance and low latency.

Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) with Multi-Attach: Provides high performance and durability, suitable for applications requiring simultaneous writes and high availability.

General Purpose SSD (gp2) with Multi-Attach: Similar to gp3 but with less flexibility and performance.

Best Solution:

Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) with Multi-Attach: This solution ensures the highest performance and availability for the application by allowing multiple EC2 instances to attach to and write to the same EBS volume simultaneously.

Understanding the Requirement: The application is stateful and requires at least two EC2 instances to be running at all times, with a highly available and fault-tolerant architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: Ensures high availability by distributing instances across multiple AZs, fulfilling the requirement of always having two instances running.

Minimum capacity of four: Provides redundancy but is more than what is required and increases cost without additional benefit.

Spot Instances: Not suitable for a stateful application requiring guaranteed availability, as Spot Instances can be terminated at any time.

Combination of On-Demand and Spot Instances: Mixing instance types might provide cost savings but does not ensure the required availability for a stateful application.

Best Solution:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: This setup ensures high availability and meets the requirement with the least cost and complexity.

Understanding the Requirement: The development team needs to prevent the launch of large EC2 instances across multiple AWS accounts used for development, staging, and production environments.

Analysis of Options:

IAM Policies: Would need to be applied individually to each user in every account, leading to significant operational overhead.

AWS Resource Access Manager: Used for sharing resources, not for enforcing restrictions on resource creation.

IAM Role in Each Account: Requires creating and managing roles in each account, leading to higher operational overhead compared to using a centralized approach.

Service Control Policy (SCP) with AWS Organizations: Provides a centralized way to enforce policies across multiple AWS accounts, ensuring that large EC2 instances cannot be launched in any account.

Best Solution:

Service Control Policy (SCP) with AWS Organizations: This solution offers the least operational overhead by allowing centralized management and enforcement of policies across all accounts, effectively preventing the launch of large EC2 instances.