Question:
A company runs an application on several Amazon EC2 instances that store persistent data on an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. The company needs to replicate the data to another AWS Region by using an AWS managed service solution. Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Options:
A company runs a Windows-based ecommerce application on Amazon EC2 instances. The application has a very high transaction rate. The company requires a durable storage solution that can deliver 200,000 IOPS for each EC2 instance.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
An application is experiencing performance issues based on increased demand. This increased demand is on read-only historical records that are pulled from an Amazon RDS-hosted database with custom views and queries. A solutions architect must improve performance without changing the database structure.
Which approach will improve performance and MINIMIZE management overhead?
A company has an application on AWS. The company hosts the backend database in an Amazon DynamoDB table. The company uses Amazon ECS containers to host the application. Read operations are primarily key-based lookups. The application is read-heavy and often encounters a DynamoDB throughput exceeded exception. A solutions architect needs to design a cost-effective solution that will resolve the DynamoDB throughput exceeded exceptions.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the FEWEST changes to the current architecture?