PenTest+ PT0-002 Exam Dumps

Before beginning a penetration test, it is crucial to determine any restrictions related to third-party assets. This is particularly important when the client’s systems are hosted by a third-party cloud provider. The penetration tester needs to know what limitations or restrictions are imposed by the third-party hosting company to avoid violating terms of service, causing unintended disruptions, or legal issues.

Understanding third-party asset restrictions ensures that the testing activities comply with legal and contractual obligations and avoid potential conflicts with the third-party provider.

References:

Penetration testing considerations: OWASP Testing Guide

Experiences from various penetration testing engagements highlighting the importance of third-party restrictions: Anubis​​.

The output provided indicates the use of the NTP protocol (Network Time Protocol) for querying a target system. The reference to "Public Clients" and the specific IP addresses listed, along with the mention of "Other Associations" and the use of NTP version 2, points towards the execution of an NTP monlist request. The monlist feature in NTP servers can be used to obtain a list of the last 600 hosts that have interacted with the NTP server. The command nmap -sU -pU:123 -Pn -n —script=ntp-monlist <target> specifically targets NTP servers on UDP port 123 to retrieve this information, making it the correct choice based on the output shown.

DirBuster is a tool that can brute-force directories and filenames on web servers. It can help a penetration tester locate a file that was uploaded to a content management system by trying different combinations of paths and names until it finds a match. DirBuster can also use wordlists to speed up the process and discover hidden files or directories. References: The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Instructor Guide (Exam PT0-002) eBook, page 156

Most likely vulnerability: Perform a SSRF attack against App01.example.com from CDN.example.com.

The scenario suggests that the CDN network (with a WAF) can be used to perform a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. Since the penetration tester has the pentester workstation interacting through the CDN/WAF and the production network is behind it, the most plausible attack vector is to exploit SSRF to interact with the internal services like App01.example.com.

Two best remediation options:

Restrict direct communications to App01.example.com to only approved components.

Require an additional authentication header value between CDN.example.com and App01.example.com.

Restrict direct communications to App01.example.com to only approved components: This limits the exposure of the application server by ensuring that only specified, trusted entities can communicate with it.

Require an additional authentication header value between CDN.example.com and App01.example.com: Adding an authentication layer between the CDN and the app server helps ensure that requests are legitimate and originate from trusted sources, mitigating SSRF and other indirect attack vectors.

Nmap Scan Observations:

CDN/WAF shows open ports for HTTP and HTTPS but filtered for MySQL, indicating it acts as a filtering layer.

App Server has open ports for HTTP, HTTPS, and filtered for MySQL.

DB Server has all ports filtered, typical for a database server that should not be directly accessible.

These findings align with the SSRF vulnerability and the appropriate remediation steps to enhance the security of internal communications.