Passed Exam Today CAS-004

Step by Step Explanation:

CI/CD pipeline (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) automates the testing, including vulnerability scanning, for every code commit before deploying to production.

Code repository stores the code but does not handle scanning.

Integrated development environment (IDE) aids developers in writing and testing code but does not enforce automated scanning.

Container orchestrator manages container deployment but does not directly address pre-production scanning.

In this scenario, the organization is looking to deploy a containerized application in the cloud and wants the infrastructure to automatically scale without handling patch management. A Platform as a Service (PaaS) model is the best fit because it allows developers to focus on the application and its deployment, while the cloud provider manages the underlying infrastructure, including patching and scaling. PaaS supports container orchestration, enabling automated scaling based on demand, and offloads most operational responsibilities to the provider. This is in contrast to Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), which requires more direct management of the infrastructure, including patching. CASP+ highlights PaaS as a service model that minimizes operational overhead for security operations teams.

References:

CASP+ CAS-004 Exam Objectives: Domain 3.0 – Enterprise Security Architecture (Cloud Service Models)

CompTIA CASP+ Study Guide: Cloud Computing and PaaS Benefits

An after-action report is a document that summarizes the performance of a team during a cybersecurity incident. It is used to review all aspects of the incident response plan, including what was done correctly, what needs improvement, and how the team responded to the incident. The CISO's review of data from a cyber exercise would typically result in an after-action report, which helps in improving future responses to incidents.

The code snippet presents a buffer size risk where the user input (username) is accepted without limiting the number of characters, potentially leading to buffer overflow vulnerabilities. The best solution is to implement input validation that limits the input to a maximum of 20 characters, matching the buffer size defined in the code. This prevents overflow attacks by ensuring that user input does not exceed the allocated memory space. Other options, like adding more parameters or allowing alphanumeric characters, do not directly address the root cause of buffer overflow vulnerabilities. CASP+ stresses the importance of proper input validation and bounds checking as critical security measures.

References:

CASP+ CAS-004 Exam Objectives: Domain 2.0 – Enterprise Security Operations (Input Validation and Buffer Overflow Prevention)

CompTIA CASP+ Study Guide: Secure Coding Practices and Input Validation Techniques