CompTIA CASP CAS-004 Book

Software composition analysis (SCA) is the most effective method to mitigate third-party risks in a software supply chain. SCA tools analyze the open-source and third-party components used in software development to identify known vulnerabilities, outdated dependencies, or licensing issues. By integrating SCA into the development environment, the company can proactively address risks related to external libraries or codebases that may introduce vulnerabilities into the software supply chain. CASP+ emphasizes the importance of securing the supply chain, particularly by identifying and addressing risks introduced by third-party software components.

References:

CASP+ CAS-004 Exam Objectives: Domain 3.0 – Enterprise Security Architecture (Third-Party Risk Management)

CompTIA CASP+ Study Guide: Securing Software Supply Chains with SCA

A risk-based threat modeling approach is the best recommendation to prevent the recurrence of major process issues during the development lifecycle. Threat modeling identifies potential security threats, vulnerabilities, and design flaws early in the development process by focusing on the specific risks posed to the system. By proactively identifying and addressing security concerns before they escalate, the development team can avoid the need for significant rewrites and ensure that security is embedded into the design of new projects. CASP+ emphasizes threat modeling as a critical activity to improve secure development practices.

References:

CASP+ CAS-004 Exam Objectives: Domain 2.0 – Enterprise Security Operations (Threat Modeling and Risk-Based Security Approaches)

CompTIA CASP+ Study Guide: Threat Modeling and Secure Development Lifecycle

Comprehensive and Detailed Step by Step Explanation:

Vendor viability refers to the risk of a startup company’s financial instability or inability to provide long-term support.

A startup may have limited resources, which could impact the security, reliability, and availability of its products.

Privacy concerns and regulatory compliance are possible risks but less relevant unless the tool deals directly with sensitive data or operates in a regulated industry.

Geographic location is unlikely to directly affect the risk unless there are jurisdictional data transfer laws involved.

References:

CompTIA CASP+ Exam Objective 1.2: Analyze the security risks and impacts of integrating diverse third-party products.

CASP+ Study Guide, 5th Edition, Chapter 2, Third-Party Risk Assessment.

Introducing secure coding training directly addresses the root cause of recurring cross-site scripting issues by educating developers about secure practices. This aligns with CASP+ objective 1.5, which includes mitigating software vulnerabilities by fostering a secure development lifecycle and promoting best practices among development teams.

________________________________________