Newly Released WGU Information-Technology-Management Exam PDF

Definition of the Accountability vs. Ownership Paradox:

This paradox arises when a CIO is held accountable for the results of technology initiatives but lacks authority over critical business processes or decisions that impact those results.

It reflects a misalignment between responsibility and control.

Impact on Organizations:

Leads to inefficiencies and miscommunications between IT and other business units.

Creates barriers to achieving organizational goals due to lack of cohesive decision-making authority.

Incorrect Options Analysis:

A: This describes strategic planning, not the paradox.

B: Relates to organizational change, but does not capture the accountability dilemma.

D: Refers to concerns about competitive disruption, unrelated to the paradox.

References and Documents of Information Technology Management:

"CIO Accountability Frameworks" (Forrester Research).

ITIL Governance Practices: Bridging Accountability Gaps (Axelos).

Understanding DevOps:

DevOps is an approach to software development and IT infrastructure that emphasizes collaboration between development and operations teams.

The key goal is to automate processes, streamline workflows, and deploy high-quality code faster.

Key Features of DevOps:

Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) to automate code testing and deployment.

Emphasis on collaboration and automation to minimize manual interventions and reduce errors.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Theory of reciprocity): Not relevant to IT development or infrastructure.

Option C (Business architecture): Focuses on organizational structure and strategy, not code automation.

Option D (Bimodal IT): Balances traditional IT with agile IT but does not focus explicitly on automation or quality code delivery.

References:

"DevOps Principles and Practices" – DevOps Institute

"Automating Development with DevOps" – AWS Documentation

Importance of Audience Awareness for IT Leaders:

When presenting to the board of directors, it is critical to tailor the content to their level of technical understanding and focus on strategic implications rather than technical details.

The board typically focuses on business outcomes, risks, and opportunities, not technical minutiae.

Key Considerations:

Highlight how IT initiatives align with business goals and deliver value.

Use concise, clear, and non-technical language while ensuring key points are well-supported with data.

Incorrect Options Analysis:

A. Provide all technical details: The board is more interested in business-level insights.

B. Focus on problems: Solutions and strategic outcomes are more relevant to the board.

C. Brevity: While being concise is important, it should not come at the cost of clarity or relevance.

References and Documents of Information Technology Management:

"Effective Communication Strategies for IT Leaders" (Harvard Business Review).

ITIL Leadership and Communication Practices (Axelos).

Purpose of Internet Use Policy in IT Ethics:

An Internet Use Policy is a subset of an organization’s IT ethics policy. It outlines acceptable use of the organization’s internet resources by employees.

By defining clear guidelines, the policy aims to minimize time wasted on personal browsing and ensure internet use aligns with business goals.

Relation to Worker Productivity:

The policy is designed to prevent misuse of the internet (e.g., excessive social media use or visiting non-work-related websites), which can negatively impact productivity.

Encouraging responsible use fosters a professional environment and helps employees focus on work-related tasks.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option B: Email monitoring may be part of broader IT security policies but is not the focus of Internet Use policies.

Option C: Branding guidelines apply to communication policies, not internet usage policies.

Option D: Printer usage is covered under equipment policies, not internet use policies.

References:

"Employee Internet Use Policy Guidelines" – SHRM

IT Ethics and Acceptable Use Policies, ISO 27002