IIA-CIA-Part1 VCE Exam Download

In situations where proper segregation of duties is not achievable due to insufficient staffing, internal auditors recommend the implementation of compensating controls. Compensating controls are additional procedures or safeguards designed to reduce the risk associated with insufficient segregation of duties. These controls do not prevent errors or fraud from occurring but aim to detect them in a timely manner if they do occur.

For instance, in a small manufacturer where the accounting department cannot separate tasks adequately due to limited staff, the auditor might suggest:

Enhanced supervisory reviews: Managers or supervisors closely review and approve transactions and reconciliations performed by the staff.

Periodic independent reviews: Regular audits or reviews by internal auditors or third-party auditors to ensure transactions are proper and in compliance with company policies.

Use of technology: Implementing automated controls that require multiple approvals for significant transactions.

Rotation of duties: Regularly rotating employees' responsibilities to prevent familiarity and collusion.

These measures help mitigate the risks that arise from the lack of segregation of duties, providing reasonable assurance that financial records are accurate and that fraud or errors are detected promptly.

References:

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) Standards and Practice Advisories.

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework.

"Internal Auditing: Assurance & Advisory Services" by IIA, Chapter on Control Activities and Segregation of Duties.

The board of directors has the ultimate responsibility for implementing the organization’s governance system. This includes overseeing the strategic direction and accountability mechanisms that align with good governance practices. The board ensures that governance structures and principles are clearly defined and effectively implemented, providing oversight to management activities. References: Corporate governance principles and guidelines, which often highlight the role of the board in setting and maintaining effective governance systems.

Reconciling claims with business trip requests approved by supervisors is effective in detecting unauthorized or personal travel claims, as it ensures travel expenses align with actual business needs, per IIA guidelines on fraud detection and control validation​​.

The key principles approach to risk management involves evaluating whether the organization's risk management practices align with fundamental principles, such as being an integral part of decision making, being transparent, responsive to change, and addressing uncertainty. This approach focuses on assessing the adherence to core risk management principles rather than specific processes or maturity levels.

The maturity model approach (A) assesses the level of sophistication and development of risk management practices. The process element approach (B) evaluates specific components of the risk management process. The key performance indicators approach (D) focuses on using specific metrics to gauge the effectiveness of risk management.

The internal auditor’s focus on the integration of risk management into decision making and its responsiveness to change aligns with the key principles approach as outlined in IIA guidance on risk management frameworks.

References:

IIA Practice Guide: Assessing the Adequacy of Risk Management Using ISO 31000

IIA Position Paper: The Role of Internal Auditing in Enterprise-Wide Risk Management