PDPF Exam Dumps : Privacy and Data Protection Foundation

When there is a processor and an operator in EEA countries, the competent authority will be the location of the Controller, however the Supervisory authority of the Controller is considered to be a concerned Supervisory Authority (who has interests).

Therefore, the Processor Supervisory Authority evaluates and approves the rules of the contract, in accordance with Article 57 of the GDPR, and must notify the Controller Supervisory Authority.

In its Article 57, the GDPR legislates on the Responsibilities of the Supervisory Authority. In its first paragraph, items “r” and “s”:

r)Authorise contractual clauses and provisions referred to in Article 46(3);

s)Approve binding corporate rules pursuant to Article 47.

Personal data are collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed. Incorrect. The local government is entitled to collect data on the number of cars present.

Personal data are kept in a form permitting identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary. Correct. In the given scenario, there is no need to retain the data of a specific car identifying the owner once it has left the area (Literature: A, Chapter 2; GDPR Article 5)

Personal data are processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data. Incorrect. The scenario does not suggest inappropriate security.

Personal data are processed in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject. Incorrect. The processing is taking place transparently, since it is communicated properly to the data subjects.

This is an issue that addresses two very important points – sensitive data and data from minors.

As these are, it is necessary to inform the Supervisory Authority and those responsible for the data subjects. Article 34 mentions:

1. When the personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller shall communicate the personal data breach to the data subject without undue delay.

Recital 38 says:

Children merit specific protection regarding their personal data, as they may be less aware of the risks, consequences and safeguards concerned and their rights in relation to the processing of personal data. Such specific protection should, in particular, apply to the use of personal data of children for the purposes of marketing or creating personality or user profiles and the collection of personal data with regard to children when using services offered directly to a child. The consent of the holder of parental responsibility should not be necessary in the context of preventive or counselling services offered directly to a child.