AgilePM-Practitioner Exam Dumps : Agile Project Management (AgilePM) Practitioner Exam

C. Independent Testing

A. Collaborative Testing

B. Repeatable Testing

D. Prioritised Testing

D. Prioritised Testing

Short Comprehensive Explanation:

Independent Testing is appropriate when someone from a different department (Finance) with no involvement in the development process conducts the testing to ensure an objective view.

Collaborative Testing involves various stakeholders, in this case, the Sales Manager and the solution tester, working together to review and test a prototype, promoting early feedback and shared understanding.

Repeatable Testing is used for security testing where predefined test scripts (provided by the bank) are applied to ensure the system meets specific security standards and can be repeated as needed.

Prioritised Testing is essential when the project's stability and core functionality, such as the website's capacity to handle new features, must be confirmed before other tests are conducted to ensure the most critical aspects are addressed first.

Again, Prioritised Testing is used to ensure that the essential requirements (Must Haves and Should Haves) are tested and validated before moving on to less critical ones (Could Haves), aligning with prioritization in Agile methodologies.

References:The Agile Project Management (AgilePM®) framework and principles, as detailed in the AgilePM® Practitioner documents and learning resources, guide the application of these testing concepts within an Agile project environment. These resources emphasize the importance of iterative development, stakeholder collaboration, and prioritization of work to ensure project success and alignment with business needs. Specific references to testing approaches and their application within Agile projects can be found in the official AgilePM® handbook and practitioner-level training materials available through APMG International and affiliated training providers.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

This question uses the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) framework. The Applications Manager’s behavior aligns most closely with the Thinking preference, which is characterized by logical decision-making and an objective assessment of facts and limitations.

1. Why the Answer is Thinking (C):

The Applications Manager made a decision based on:

Objective evaluation of facts: They recognized the need for more investment than they could raise independently.

Self-assessment of skills: They identified their personal limitations in transitioning from a technical role to a business leadership role.

These actions reflect a logical, analytical approach to problem-solving, which is the hallmark of the Thinking preference.

2. Analysis of Other Options:

Option A: Extravert

Extraversion describes a focus on energy derived from external interactions and collaboration. While this may apply in some leadership contexts, the Applications Manager's decision was based on self-analysis and logical reasoning, not social tendencies.

Eliminate.

Option B: Introvert

Introversion involves a preference for introspection and focusing on inner thoughts. While there is an element of self-reflection in the manager’s actions, the emphasis on logical decision-making aligns more with Thinking than Introversion.

Eliminate.

Option D: Feeling

The Feeling preference emphasizes decision-making based on values and empathy. While the manager may have considered the impact of their limitations, the decision was based on objective facts rather than personal or emotional values.

Eliminate.

3. Practical Example of Thinking Behavior:

A Thinking-oriented leader might decide to step aside from a leadership role if they objectively determine that another leader would better serve the organization’s goals, as shown in the Applications Manager’s decision.

4. Reference to MBTI:

Thinking (T):

Decisions are guided by logic, objectivity, and the analysis of facts.

Focuses on practical outcomes and realistic self-assessment.

Feeling (F):

Decisions are guided by empathy and values, prioritizing relationships over objectivity.

In applying Agile Project Management to the creation of an Outline Business Case in support of the Feasibility Assessment, the following two statements are most appropriate:

B. Enough description of the required refurbishment work should be provided to enable the Architecture Angels' Finance Director to decide whether the project should proceed.

Agile approaches favor providing just enough detail to make informed decisions without going into unnecessary depth at early stages. This allows for flexibility and adaptation as more information becomes available.

C. During Feasibility, potential beneficiaries of the project should be involved when the Outline Business Case for the refurbishment is created.

Agile methodologies emphasize stakeholder engagement and user involvement early and throughout the project. This ensures that the project delivers value and meets the needs of those it is intended to benefit.