CIMA F3 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Under typical takeover regulation and CIMA F3 principles, the following are legitimate post-offer defences:

A. Independent professional revaluation of assets

This is legitimate: providing better information to shareholders to show that the bid undervalues the company.

C. Make a counter-bid for Company A (a “Pac-Man defence”)

This is acceptable if it can be justified as enhancing shareholder wealth.

E. Refer the bid to competition authorities

It is a legitimate defence to challenge the bid on competition/antitrust grounds if it may reduce competition.

In contrast:

B (altering the articles to change acceptance thresholds mid-bid) is a classic frustrating action, usually not allowed without shareholder approval during an offer period.

D (publishing knowingly unrealistic optimistic forecasts) is misleading and not permitted under market and takeover rules.

Bond alone: pay 6% on $100m = 6m per year.

Add swap (receive 5% fixed, pay Libor + 1):

Net rate = 6% (bond) − 5% (received) + (Libor + 1%).

With Libor = 4% → 6 − 5 + (4 + 1) = 5% total.

Interest cost falls from 6% to 5% → 1% reduction.

Answer: B. Fall by 1%.

The assistant has discounted free cash flows to all investors at the WACC (10%). That gives the value of the business (enterprise value), not directly the value of equity.

For a geared company:

If you discount free cash flows to the firm (all investors) at the WACC, you obtain the total value of the firm (V).

To get equity value (E), you must then subtract the market value of debt (D):

E=V−DE = V - DE=V−D

Here, the company has a $6m 7% undated bond trading at par, so the market value of debt is $6m. That amount has not been deducted.

The other options are not errors:

The perpetuity discounting using 7.91.102×0.10\frac{7.9}{1.10^2 \times 0.10}1.102×0.107.9​ is correct for a constant cash flow from year 3 onward.

Using WACC (10%) is appropriate for FCFF.

Tax at 20% is already reflected in either the cash flows or the WACC; it is not “missing” as a separate line.

So the specific mistake is failing to deduct the $6m debt value, i.e. option D.