Scrum SPS Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The Nexus Sprint Review is an event where the Nexus, consisting of multiple Scrum Teams, presents the Integrated Increment to the stakeholders for inspection and feedback 1. The Integrated Increment is the sum of all the work done by the Scrum Teams in a Sprint that meets the Definition of Done 1. The purpose of the Nexus Sprint Review is to inspect the outcome of the Sprint, discuss the progress toward the Product Goal, discuss any changes in the environment, and collaborate on what to do next 2.

In Scenario A, the Nexus Sprint Review is not conducted effectively. The teams are not using a shared environment to demonstrate the Integrated Increment, but rather showing their individual work. This means that the stakeholders cannot see the whole product and how it works together. The teams are also delaying the integration of their work, which can lead to quality issues, technical debt, and increased complexity 1. The stakeholders do not provide much feedback, which means that the Nexus cannot adapt to the changing needs and expectations of the customers and users. The event ends without any clear outcomes or next steps.

If this pattern continues for multiple Sprints, the effects may be:

• Quality will degrade as the teams delay creating a single Integrated Increment. This is answer B. By not integrating their work frequently and continuously, the teams will face more challenges and risks in ensuring that the product is functional, reliable, and usable. The teams will also miss the opportunity to validate their assumptions and learn from the feedback on the Integrated Increment 1.
• Ability to adapt will suffer as the stakeholders continue to disengage and not give feedback. This is answer D. By not engaging the stakeholders in a meaningful dialogue and collaboration, the Nexus will lose the insight and direction that the feedback provides. The Nexus will also risk building the wrong product or features that do not meet the needs and expectations of the customers and users. The stakeholders will also lose trust and confidence in the Nexus and the product 2.

The other two answers are not correct because:

• There will be more and more work to inspect so teams will need their own individual Sprint Reviews. This is answer A. This is not a valid effect because the Nexus Sprint Review replaces the individual Scrum Team Sprint Reviews 1. The Nexus Sprint Review is not a time for each team to present their work, but rather for the Nexus to present the Integrated Increment. The teams should not need their own Sprint Reviews, but rather focus on integrating their work and delivering a valuable product 1.
• Empiricism will suffer as the teams cannot produce a shared velocity. This is answer C. This is not a valid effect because velocity is not a measure of empiricism. Empiricism is the principle of making decisions based on observation, inspection, and adaptation 1. Velocity is a measure of the amount of work done by a team or a Nexus in a Sprint. Velocity is not a mandatory artifact or metric in Scrum or Nexus, and it does not reflect the quality or value of the work done 1.

The most important concern for multiple Scrum Teams when they are working from the same Product Backlog is minimizing dependencies between teams. Dependencies are the relationships or constraints that exist between the work items or the teams that affect the delivery of the product 11. Dependencies can cause delays, rework, waste, and quality issues, and they can reduce the agility and value delivery of the Scrum Teams 2233. Therefore, minimizing dependencies between teams is a critical concern for scaling Scrum effectively 112233.

Statement A is incorrect because meeting original scope projections is not a primary concern for multiple Scrum Teams working from the same Product Backlog. Scrum does not prescribe a fixed scope for the product, but rather embraces change and adaptation based on feedback and learning 44. The Product Backlog is a dynamic and emergent artifact that reflects the current understanding of the product vision, goals, and requirements 44. The Product Owner is responsible for managing the Product Backlog and ordering the items in a way that maximizes the value of the product and the work of the Scrum Teams 44. Therefore, meeting original scope projections is not a relevant or realistic concern for scaling Scrum.

Statement C is incorrect because clear definition of requirements is not the most important concern for multiple Scrum Teams working from the same Product Backlog. While having clear and well-defined requirements is desirable and beneficial for the Scrum Teams, it is not always possible or necessary in a complex and uncertain environment 44. Scrum does not require detailed upfront specifications, but rather encourages empirical discovery and experimentation through frequent delivery and feedback 44. The Product Backlog items are refined and clarified by the Product Owner and the Developers as they collaborate and learn more about the product and the users 44. Therefore, clear definition of requirements is not the most critical concern for scaling Scrum.

Statement D is incorrect because making sure there is enough work for everyone on every team is not the most important concern for multiple Scrum Teams working from the same Product Backlog. Scrum does not focus on maximizing the utilization of the Scrum Team members, but rather on maximizing the value of the product and the work of the Scrum Teams 44. The Scrum Teams are self-organizing and cross-functional, which means they can decide how to do their work and have all the skills needed to create a potentially releasable Increment 44. The Scrum Teams pull work from the Product Backlog in agreement with the Product Owner, and they commit to delivering an Integrated Increment that meets the Nexus Sprint Goal 1144. Therefore, making sure there is enough work for everyone on every team is not the most essential concern for scaling Scrum.

The best way for multiple Scrum Teams to deliver a valuable and useful Increment in a Sprint is to complete work that integrates with all of the other work from other Scrum Teams on the initiative. This means that the Scrum Teams collaborate and coordinate their work to produce a single Integrated Increment that meets the Definition of Done and the Product Goal. The Integrated Increment is the combined work of all the Scrum Teams that is potentially releasable and provides value to the customers and stakeholders 11.

The other options are not correct for the following reasons:

• Each Scrum Team delivering done Increments of its own area of responsibility and integrating them into a whole product during stabilization prior to release is not a good idea, as it violates the Scrum principles and values. The Scrum Guide states that the Scrum Team delivers a product Increment that is usable and valuable at the end of every Sprint, not at the end of the release 22. Delaying the integration until the stabilization phase would compromise the transparency, the feedback, and the adaptability of the Scrum Teams.
• Each Scrum Team providing a unique done Increment that includes the team’s added functionality is not a good idea, as it does not ensure that the product Increment is integrated and consistent across the initiative. The Scrum Guide states that the product Increment is the sum of all the Product Backlog items completed during a Sprint and all previous Sprints 22. If each Scrum Team provides a unique Increment, they may not be aligned with the Product Goal and the Definition of Done, and they may create conflicts or dependencies with other Scrum Teams.
• Functionality not integrated with the work of other Scrum Teams being delivered as unintegrated Increments to demonstrate the value created by the Scrum Teams unable to completely integrate their Increments is not a good idea, as it does not ensure that the product Increment is done and valuable. The Scrum Guide states that the product Increment must be usable and meet the Definition of Done 22. If some functionality is not integrated with the work of other Scrum Teams, it may not be usable or valuable to the customers and stakeholders, and it may introduce technical debt or quality issues.