ITIL ITIL-4-Specialist-Monitor-Support-Fulfil Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

When a service provider lacks human resources to establish problem models, it is advisable touse a third-party consulting serviceto help develop these models. ITIL encourages organizations to leverage external expertise when internal resources are insufficient, ensuring that problem management practices remain effective​​.

Postponing problem management(Option B) is not recommended as it delays resolution.

Delegating to a problem coordinator(Option C) might help, but if there are insufficient resources, external help is a better option.

Creating a single model(Option D) is not effective, as problems vary and need tailored approaches.

To determine the correct answer, we must first evaluate each of the metrics provided in the options against the ITIL 4 guidelines for Incident Management.

Time between incident detection and acceptance for diagnosis:This metric is critical in measuring the efficiency of incident response processes, as it indicates how quickly an incident is identified and taken up for diagnosis. ITIL emphasizes that timely detection and diagnosis are vital to resolving incidents efficiently, making this a relevant key metric​​.

User satisfaction with incident handling and resolution:ITIL 4 places strong emphasis on customer-centricity, including user satisfaction as a key measure of service success. Monitoring user satisfaction helps assess the effectiveness and user-friendliness of incident handling, which is essential for ensuring the quality of service. This is explicitly mentioned in ITIL practices for service management​.

Percentage of incidents resolved before being reported by users(Correct Answer):Although detecting incidents before users report them is important, it is not typically used as a direct measure of incident resolution effectiveness. Instead, this is more of a metric associated withEvent ManagementandMonitoring, where systems automatically detect potential issues before they impact users. Thus, while it helps minimize disruption, it does not directly measure how well incidents are resolved after they are detected​​.

Percentage of incidents detected via monitoring and event management:This metric is related to the ITIL practices of monitoring and event management, which are crucial for proactively identifying issues before they affect users. It is an important metric for improving incident detection and, subsequently, the speed of resolution​​.

In conclusion, the correct answer isC, as the percentage of incidents resolved before being reported by users is more relevant to event detection and monitoring processes rather than a direct indicator of theeffectiveness of resolving incidents quickly and efficiently. The other options represent key metrics directly linked to the success factor of resolving incidents efficiently, as outlined in ITIL 4​​​.

Active monitoringrefers to continuously checking the status of configuration items (CIs) and other components, regardless of whether an event has occurred. This type of monitoring proactively looks for potential issues by continuously evaluating the state of systems and services, unlike passive monitoring, which only reacts when an event is triggered.

Active Monitoring: This involves actively probing or querying systems to check their status, even if no event has occurred. It helps in detecting issues before they manifest into problems.

Option C ("Active monitoring takes place whether an event has occurred or not")is the correct answer because active monitoring involves continuous checks, independent of event occurrence​​.

Incorrect Options:

Option A: Active monitoring happens continuously, not just when an event occurs.

Option B: This describes passive monitoring, where CIs report an event once it happens.

Option D: Active monitoring does not require conditions to be met; it happens continuously.