Legit IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Download

A centralized organizational structure concentrates decision-making authority at the top levels of management. While this ensures control and consistency, it can lead to slower decision-making due to the need for approvals from higher levels.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Communication conflicts.

Incorrect.

Centralized structures generally have clear lines of authority and communication, reducing conflicts.

Communication conflicts are more common in decentralized structures where multiple decision-makers exist.

Option B: Slower decision making.

Correct.

Since all decisions must pass through top management, it delays responses to market changes and reduces flexibility.

Lower-level employees have less authority to make operational decisions, leading to bottlenecks.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors assess organizational governance, including decision-making efficiency in centralized vs. decentralized structures. (IIA Practice Guide: Organizational Governance)

Option C: Loss of economies of scale.

Incorrect.

Centralization improves economies of scale by standardizing processes and consolidating resources.

Decentralization (not centralization) is more likely to lead to duplication of efforts and a loss of economies of scale.

Option D: Vulnerabilities in sharing knowledge.

Incorrect.

Centralized organizations tend to have structured knowledge-sharing frameworks, such as standardized policies and corporate training programs.

Understanding Spear Phishing Attacks:

Spear phishing is a targeted cyberattack where attackers send personalized emails to trick individuals into providing sensitive data (e.g., passwords, financial information).

Unlike regular phishing, which casts a wide net, spear phishing is highly customized and often appears to come from a trusted source.

Why Option C Is Correct?

The scenario describes a highly personalized email (related to a golf membership) that tricks the recipient into clicking a malicious hyperlink and entering sensitive data.

This matches the definition of a spear phishing attack, where an attacker tailors a scam specifically for an individual.

IIA GTAG 16 – Data Analytics and ISO 27001 emphasize the need for security awareness training to mitigate such threats.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Website attack causing a server crash):

This describes a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack, not spear phishing.

Option B (Generic recorded message requesting password data):

This is vishing (voice phishing), not spear phishing. Spear phishing relies on personalized emails.

Option D (Fake social media investment opportunity):

This describes mass phishing, which targets multiple users, unlike spear phishing, which is highly targeted.

Spear phishing is a targeted attack that uses personal details to deceive individuals, making option C the best choice.

IIA GTAG 16 and ISO 27001 emphasize cybersecurity awareness to prevent such attacks.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IIA GTAG 16 – Data Analytics in Cybersecurity Audits

ISO 27001 – Cybersecurity Best Practices

NIST SP 800-61 – Incident Response Guidelines for Phishing Attacks

Understanding Labor Variances in Cost Accounting:

Labor efficiency variance measures the difference between the actual hours worked and the standard hours allowed for actual production.

Labor rate variance measures the difference between the actual labor cost per hour and the standard rate set for labor.

Why Options 1 (Favorable Labor Efficiency Variance) and 2 (Adverse Labor Rate Variance) Are Correct?

Favorable Labor Efficiency Variance (1):

Hiring more experienced researchers should lead to higher productivity, meaning that the team completes tasks faster, reducing the total labor hours required.

This results in a favorable labor efficiency variance because less time is spent on the project than initially expected.

Adverse Labor Rate Variance (2):

More experienced employees command higher salaries, leading to an increase in labor costs per hour compared to the budgeted rate.

This results in an adverse labor rate variance because the actual wage rate exceeds the standard rate.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option 3 (Adverse Labor Efficiency Variance):

This would occur if the new hires were less productive, which contradicts the scenario.

Option 4 (Favorable Labor Rate Variance):

A favorable variance in labor rate occurs when labor costs are lower than expected, which is unlikely when hiring more experienced (higher-paid) employees.

Hiring more experienced employees improves efficiency (favorable efficiency variance) but increases wages (adverse rate variance).

IIA Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care requires auditors to consider operational efficiency in decision-making evaluations.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care

IIA Practice Guide – Assessing Business Performance Metrics

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation identifies two categories of workplace factors:

Hygiene Factors – Prevent dissatisfaction but do not create motivation (e.g., salary, job security, work conditions).

Motivational Factors – Lead to job satisfaction and motivation (e.g., achievement, responsibility, advancement, recognition).

(A) Salary and status. ❌ Incorrect.

Salary is a hygiene factor, meaning it prevents dissatisfaction but does not directly drive job satisfaction.

Status is also not a strong motivator under Herzberg’s theory.

(B) Responsibility and advancement. ✅ Correct.

These are motivational factors in Herzberg’s theory.

Employees feel satisfied when they have responsibility, career growth, and promotion opportunities.

IIA GTAG "Auditing Human Resource Management" highlights career development as a key driver of employee motivation and retention.

(C) Work conditions and security. ❌ Incorrect.

These are hygiene factors, which help avoid dissatisfaction but do not actively motivate employees.

(D) Peer relationships and personal life. ❌ Incorrect.

Good relationships with coworkers help, but they are not primary motivators under Herzberg’s theory.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing Human Resource Management"

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance (Employee Motivation & Engagement)

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation (Workplace Psychology Research)

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is B, as responsibility and advancement are the key motivational factors leading to employee satisfaction.