CertsTopics Logo

Weekend Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

Last Attempt DOP-C02 Questions

Page: 10 / 22
Total 322 questions
Get DOP-C02 Full Access Download DOP-C02 PDF

AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional Questions and Answers

Question 37

A development team uses AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeBuild to develop and deploy an application. Changes to the code are submitted by pull requests. The development team reviews and merges the pull requests, and then the pipeline builds and tests the application.

Over time, the number of pull requests has increased. The pipeline is frequently blocked because of failing tests. To prevent this blockage, the development team wants to run the unit and integration tests on each pull request before it is merged.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

A.

Create a CodeBuild project to run the unit and integration tests. Create a CodeCommit approval rule template. Configure the template to require the successful invocation of the CodeBuild project. Attach the approval rule to the project's CodeCommit repository.

B.

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule to match pullRequestCreated events from CodeCommit Create a CodeBuild project to run the unit and integration tests. Configure the CodeBuild project as a target of the EventBridge rule that includes a custom event payload with the CodeCommit repository and branch information from the event.

C.

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule to match pullRequestCreated events from CodeCommit. Modify the existing CodePipeline pipeline to not run the deploy steps if the build is started from a pull request. Configure the EventBridge rule to run the pipeline with a custom payload that contains the CodeCommit repository and branch information from the event.

D.

Create a CodeBuild project to run the unit and integration tests. Create a CodeCommit notification rule that matches when a pull request is created or updated. Configure the notification rule to invoke the CodeBuild project.

Question 38

A company has an application that runs on Amazon EC2 instances that are in an Auto Scaling group. When the application starts up. the application needs to process data from an Amazon S3 bucket before the application can start to serve requests.

The size of the data that is stored in the S3 bucket is growing. When the Auto Scaling group adds new instances, the application now takes several minutes to download and process the data before the application can serve requests. The company must reduce the time that elapses before new EC2 instances are ready to serve requests.

Which solution is the MOST cost-effective way to reduce the application startup time?

Options:

A.

Configure a warm pool for the Auto Scaling group with warmed EC2 instances in the Stopped state. Configure an autoscaling:EC2_INSTANCE_LAUNCHING lifecycle hook on the Auto Scaling group. Modify the application to complete the lifecycle hook when the application is ready to serve requests.

B.

Increase the maximum instance count of the Auto Scaling group. Configure an autoscaling:EC2_INSTANCE_LAUNCHING lifecycle hook on the Auto Scaling group. Modify the application to complete the lifecycle hook when the application is ready to serve requests.

C.

Configure a warm pool for the Auto Scaling group with warmed EC2 instances in the Running state. Configure an autoscaling:EC2_INSTANCE_LAUNCHING lifecycle hook on the Auto Scaling group. Modify the application to complete the lifecycle hook when the application is ready to serve requests.

D.

Increase the maximum instance count of the Auto Scaling group. Configure an autoscaling:EC2_INSTANCE_LAUNCHING lifecycle hook on the Auto Scaling group. Modify the application to complete the lifecycle hook and to place the new instance in the Standby state when the application is ready to serve requests.

Question 39

A DevOps team supports an application that runs on a large number of Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group. The DevOps team uses AWS CloudFormation to deploy the EC2 instances. The application recently experienced an issue. A single instance returned errors to a large percentage of requests. The EC2 instance responded as healthy to both Amazon EC2 and Elastic Load Balancing health checks. The DevOps team collects application logs in Amazon CloudWatch by using the embedded metric format. The DevOps team needs to receive an alert if any EC2 instance is responsible for more than half of all errors. Which combination of steps will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead? (Select TWO.)

Options:

A.

Create a CloudWatch Contributor Insights rule that groups logs from the CloudWatch application logs based on instance ID and errors.

B.

Create a resource group in AWS Resource Groups. Use the CloudFormation stack to group the resources for the application. Add the application to CloudWatch Application Insights. Use the resource group to identify the application.

C.

Create a metric filter for the application logs to count the occurrence of the term "Error." Create a CloudWatch alarm that uses the METRIC_COUNT function to determine whether errors have occurred. Configure the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to notify the DevOps team.

D.

Create a CloudWatch alarm that uses the INSIGHT_RULE_METRIC function to determine whether a specific instance is responsible for more than half of all errors reported by EC2 instances. Configure the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to notify the DevOps team.

E.

Create a CloudWatch subscription filter for the application logs that filters for errors and invokes an AWS Lambda function. Configure the Lambda function to send the instance ID and error in a notification to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to notify the DevOps team.

Question 40

A company is developing a microservices-based application on AWS. The application consists of AWS Lambda functions and Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) services that need to be deployed frequently.

A DevOps engineer needs to implement a consistent deployment solution across all components of the application. The solution must automate the deployments, minimize downtime during updates, and manage configuration data for the application.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST deployment effort?

Options:

A.

Use AWS CloudFormation to define and provision the Lambda functions and ECS services. Implement stack updates with resource replacement for all components. Use AWS Secrets Manager to manage the configuration data.

B.

Use AWS CodeDeploy to manage deployments for the Lambda functions and ECS services. Implement canary deployments for the Lambda functions. Implement blue/green deployments for the ECS services. Use AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store to manage the configuration data.

C.

Use AWS Step Functions to orchestrate deployments for the Lambda functions and ECS services. Use canary deployments for the Lambda functions and ECS services in a different AWS Region. Use AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store to manage the configuration data.

D.

Use AWS Systems Manager to manage deployments for the Lambda functions and ECS services. Implement all-at-once deployments for the Lambda functions. Implement rolling updates for the ECS services. Use AWS Secrets Manager to manage the configuration data.

Page: 10 / 22
Total 322 questions
Get DOP-C02 Full Access Download DOP-C02 PDF