L4M3 Questions Bank

Liquidated damages are presented in certain legal contracts as an estimate of otherwise intangible or hard-to-define losses to one of the parties. It is a provision that allows for the payment of a specified sum should one of the parties be in breach of contract.

Understanding Liquidated Damages

Liquidated damages are meant as a fair representation of losses in situations where actual damages are difficult to ascertain. In general, liquidated damages are meant to be fair, rather than punitive.

Liquidated damages may be referred to in a specific contract clause to cover circumstances where a party faces a loss from assets that do not have a direct monetary correlation. For example, if a party in a contract were to leak supply chain pricing information that is vital to a business, this could fall under liquidated damages.

A common example is a design phase for a new product that may involve consultation with outside suppliers and consultants in addition to a company's employees. The underlying plans or designs for a product might not have a set market value. This may be true even if the subsequent product is crucial to the progress and growth of a company. These plans may be deemed to be trade secrets of the business and highly sensitive. If the plans were exposed by a disgruntled employee or supplier, it could greatly hamper the ability to generate revenue from the release of that product. A company would have to make an estimation in advance of what such losses could cost in order to include this in a liquidated damages clause of a contract.

Limitations of Liquidated Damages

It is possible that a liquidated damages clause might not be enforced by the courts. This can occur if the monetary amount of liquidated damages cited in the clause is extraordinarily disproportional to the scope of what was affected by the breached contract.

Such limitations prevent a plaintiff from attempting to claim an unsubstantiated exorbitant amount from a defendant. For instance, a plaintiff might not be able to claim liquidated damages that amount to multiples of its gross revenue if the breach only affected a specific portion of its operations. The concept of liquidated damages is framed around compensation related to some harm and injury to the party rather than a fine imposed on the defendant.

The courts typically require that the parties involved make the most reasonable assessment possible for the liquidated damages clause at the time the contract is signed. This can provide a sense of understanding and reassurance of what is at stake if that aspect of the contract is breached. A liquidated damages clause can also give the parties involved a basis to negotiate from for an out-of-court settlement.

Information Assurance (IA)

Information Assurance (IA) is the practice of managing information-related risks and the steps involved to protect information systems such as computer and network systems. The IA transformation is a partnership that stretches across the Department of Defense (DoD), Office of National Intelligence, Committee on National Security Systems, National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), and the Office of Management and Budget.

The US Government's definition of information assurance is:

“measures that protect and defend information and information systems by ensuring their availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation. These measures include providing for restoration of information systems by incorporating protection, detection, and reaction capabilities.”

Information Assurance (IA) is essentially protecting information systems, and is often associated with the following five pillars:

- Integrity

- Availability

- Authentication

- Confidentiality

- Nonrepudiation

The following pillars can be applied in a variety of ways, depending on the sensitivity of the information, or information systems within your organization. Currently, these five pillars are used at the heart of the US Governments ability to conduct safe and secure operations in a global environment.

1. Integrity

Integrity involves assurance that all information systems are protected and not tampered with. IA aims to maintain integrity through means such as anti-virus software on all computer system, and ensuring all staff with access to know how to appropriately use their systems to minimize malware, or viruses entering information systems.

2. Availability

Availability simply means those who need access to information, are allowed to access it. Information should be available to only those who are aware of the risks associated with information systems.

3. Authentication

Authentication involves ensuring those who have access to information, are who they say they are. Ways of improving authentication involve methods such as two-factor authentication, strong passwords, bio-metrics and other devices. Authentication may also be used to not only identify users, but also other devices.

4. Confidentiality

IA involves the confidentiality of information, meaning only those with authorization may view certain data. This step is closely mirrored by the six data processing principles of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), where by personal data must be processed in a secure manner "using appropriate technical and organizational measures" ("integrity and confidentiality").

5. Nonrepudiation

The final pillar simply means someone with access to your organizations information system cannot deny having completed an action within the system, as there should be methods in place to prove that they did make said action.

Article 2 of CISG states that:

This Convention does not apply to sales:

(a) of goods bought for personal, family or household use, unless the seller, at any time before or at the conclusion of the contract, neither knew nor ought to have known that the goods were bought for any such use;

(b) by auction;

(c) on execution or otherwise by authority of law;

(d) of stocks, shares, investment securities, negotiable instruments or money;

(e) of ships, vessels, hovercraft or aircraft;

(f) of electricity.

LO 1, AC 1.2

KPIs and the targets for supplier should be SMART:

- Specific: What exactly do you want to achieve?

- Measurable: How will you identify that you have achieved your goal?

- Achievable: Is your goal really attainable?

- Relevant: Is it relevant to you or, in other words, does it align with where you want to be?

- Time-bound (or timely): When will you deliver your goal, and what are the key milestones?

The two KPIs (Delivery in one hour, Return orders in one hour) are not realistic and achievable for international suppliers. Therefore, you should not put such high targets for supplier.