Download Latest C_OCM_2503 Questions

Preparing for a detailed change impact analysis (CIA) workshop, typically conducted in the SAP Activate Explore or Realize phase, requires careful planning to ensure actionable outcomes. Option A is correct because inviting the right participants—process owners (who understand current workflows), subject matter experts (SMEs, who provide technical/process depth), and key users (who represent end-user perspectives)—ensures a comprehensive assessment of impacts across affected areas. Their diverse insights are critical for identifying specific changes at a granular level, such as how a process shift affects daily tasks or system usage. Without these stakeholders, the workshop risks missing critical details or buy-in, undermining its effectiveness.

Option B is correct because creating a template with relevant business processes broken down to a suitable level (e.g., subprocesses like “order entry” within “order-to-cash”) provides a structured framework for discussion. This template might include columns for as-is vs. to-be states, impact severity, and affected roles, enabling participants to systematically evaluate changes. It ensures focus and consistency, preventing the workshop from becoming a free-for-all discussion, and aligns with SAP’s methodical approach to CIA.

Option C is incorrect because scheduling individual upfront meetings with all participants is impractical and time-consuming for a detailed CIA, which builds on prior high-level analysis. While some pre-workshop input might be gathered, the workshop itself is the collaborative forum for insights, not pre-meetings. Option D is incorrect because limiting the analysis to one dimension (e.g., only “process”) contradicts the holistic nature of a detailed CIA, which assesses multiple dimensions (process, technology, organization, people) to capture the full scope of change. SAP OCM emphasizes stakeholder inclusion and structured tools for detailed CIA preparation.

“Preparation for a detailed change impact analysis workshop involves inviting key stakeholders such as process owners, SMEs, and key users, and providing a structured template of business processes to guide the assessment of impacts across all dimensions” (SAP Activate Methodology, OCM Workstream, Detailed CIA Preparation).

Skipping the detailed CIA (Explore/Realize phases) in SAP OCM has significant consequences. Option C is correct because underestimating impacts (e.g., process changes, user resistance) leads to inadequate preparation, risking adoption failure. Option D is correct as missing detailed insights (e.g., specific process or role changes) hampers transition planning, leaving gaps in training or communication.

Option A is incorrect—team motivation isn’t directly tied to CIA; it’s more about leadership and recognition. Option B is incorrect; the change story relies on high-level insights, not detailed CIA, though it might be refined later. SAP OCM stresses detailed CIA for precise transition management.

“Omitting detailed CIA risks underestimating impacts and missing critical transition planning data, jeopardizing project success” (SAP Activate, OCM Workstream, CIA Importance).

SAP’s OCM framework integrates with SAP Activate to align people efforts with project stages. Option A is correct because activities are phase-specific—e.g., stakeholder analysis starts in Prepare, training in Realize—ensuring timing matches project needs, like assessing readiness before design. Option C is correct as some activities span phases—e.g., communication begins in Prepare (awareness) and continues through Run (adoption updates), adapting to evolving contexts like new releases.

Option B is incorrect—OCM dimensions (e.g., strategy, leadership) are overarching, not phase-bound; they apply across the lifecycle. Option D is incorrect—Activate phases (Discover, Prepare, etc.) structure the project, not the OCM framework’s dimensions. SAP OCM syncs with Activate’s rhythm.

“The OCM framework connects to SAP Activate by assigning activity starts to specific phases and allowing some activities to span multiple phases for continuous impact” (SAP OCM Framework, Activate Integration).

Change agents in SAP OCM extend change management’s reach by handling local activities (e.g., unit-specific workshops). Option C is correct because it scales efforts—e.g., a central change manager can’t train 10 sites alone, but agents in each location can, multiplying coverage efficiently.For instance, an agent in a regional office might run a Q&A session tailored to local process concerns, amplifying OCM impact without overloading the core team.

Option A is incorrect—milestone adherence is a project management outcome, not a direct value of agent tasks. Option B is incorrect; attitude shifts might occur, but it’s not the primary benefit—effectiveness is. Option D is incorrect—reducing manager resistance depends on broader engagement, not just agent activities. SAP OCM leverages agents for scalability.

“Change agents planning and executing local activities add value by scaling change management efforts across the organization effectively” (SAP Activate, Change Network Value).