Download Full Version L4M1 CIPS Exam

- Definition of ‘structured procurement process’ – when an organisation provides a sequence of actions / steps to take to get the outcome (the procurement of an item). This involves an organisation providing guidelines and instructions of how things should be done. Basically following a step-by-step process.

- Why this is important – Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done, maintains consistency, prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour, improves efficiency, better managerial control, compliance (with laws and standards), assists with continuous improvement, may result in time/ cost savings, reduces risks such as fraudulent spending.

Example essay:

The first part of the question is worth 10 points, so you could include a few of the following points. It would also be good to include examples:

- Structured procurement involves creating rules on how procurement should be done

- This is in contrast to reactive / maverick spending

- May come about due to company policy, external regulations or through trying to achieve Competitive Advantage

- Examples include an organisation having set procedures for ordering items of different spend- e.g. Procurement Assistants can purchase items up to £500. Items between £500-£1000 require a manager’s approval and anything over £1000 requires a written Business Case in order to procure

- Structures Procurement Processes will usually also include the use of a designated e-procurement tool. E.g. an organisation may insist that all tenders use a certain online system and that invoices are sent via X system within 30 days.

The second part of the question is worth slightly more points, so spend more time on this. You could put each of the reasons why it is important in a separate paragraph. Also use examples where you can;

- Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done- having structured processes means having a step-by-step guide to how to procure. This means activities are well co-ordinated and there are no gaps, no duplications of effort and no conflicting efforts. It may involve assigning different people in the team different roles e.g. someone makes the requisition and someone else approves it. It also means that nothing is forgotten.

- Maintains consistency- having standardised processes means each procurement exercise follows the same process. This may include using a standard template for a requisition or ITT. Where there is consistency, this results in time being saved and less mistakes being made as everyone (including supply partners) is familiar with the processes.

- Prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour- in organisations that use structured procurement processes everyone does the same. This means there is no conflict (e.g. one person doing things one way and another person does it differently and arguing which way is best). It also means no one can do procurement ‘wrong’ – there are written guides and procedures to follow. This is particularly helpful for new starters.

- Efficiency – time and money can be saved where there are standard procedures as people don’t have to plan each procurement activity individually. Structured Procurement Processes may also involve completing bulk orders and co-ordinating activity within the organisation which means less orders are placed over the year and efficiency savings can be made. For example, a factory may create an order of cleaning products once a quarter, compared to ordering products just as and when they are required. This will save time of the procurement department overall throughout the year and allows them to focus on other more value-adding tasks.

- Better managerial control – Managers have more oversight when using structured procurement. There are clear rules as to when managers need to be involved and provide sign-off. This visibility makes it easier for managers to make decisions and allows for early intervention where someone needs assistance. It will reduce maverick spending and fraudulent spending. For example, it is much harder to provide kick-backs to suppliers when there are clear processes and audit trails and managers have visibility over all processes.

- Compliance (with laws and standards) – particularly in the Public Sector there are rules and regulations regarding procurement practices. Using standardised processes allows organisations to demonstrate compliance with appropriate legislation. It also protects them from ‘challenge’. This is when a bidder who is unsuccessful challenges the decision to award a contract to someone else. Using a structured procurement process allows the organisation to demonstrate that they procured the item correctly and the challenge is unfounded.

Tutor Notes

- This topic isn’t as well explained in the new study guide as it used to be. It’s all pretty obvious stuff but the language is slightly different. The guide now talks about ‘compliance with processes’ and the benefits this brings. Which is exactly the same as why do you follow a structured process. This is on p. 114.

- If you’re feeling clever, you could mention the difference between Public and Private Sector- e.g. a private organisation may use standardised processes for efficiency and cost savings, whereas a public sector organisation may use it more for compliance purposes.

How to approach this question

- Sometimes CIPS give you a steer on how to answer the question. My advice is to follow it. The question says you MAY make reference to the following, but I’d use those hints as a guide for content- a paragraph on each and you’re done!

- When you’ve got a ‘may make reference to’ hint – this means you can completely ignore it and do your own thing and bring in your own ideas. May means it’s optional, so you wouldn’t be penalised for this. However, you have to consider the examiner’s mark scheme- it will detail options of stuff you can write for funding, ownership etc. Then there will be a line at the bottom saying something like ‘accept other options such as x and y’. This leaves it up to the examiner to decide whether what you’ve said is relevant. I’d personally not leave it up to chance you get a lenient examiner. If you write what’s definitely going to be on their mark scheme, you’re more likely to get more points.

Example Essay

The modern economy is a complex tapestry of various sectors, each with its own distinct characteristics and functions. The three prominent sectors are the public sector, the private sector, and the third sector. These sectors differ significantly in terms of their funding mechanisms, ownership structures, objectives, the concept of shares, and their administration.

Firstly, the public sector is predominantly funded by the government through taxation, grants, and other forms of public revenue. Its very existence hinges on the provision of essential services and the fulfilment of societal needs. These organizations are owned by the government, be it at the federal, state, or local level. Unlike the private sector, the concept of shares doesn't apply in the public sector. Instead, the government allocates budgets to various departments and agencies for public services and projects. The primary objectives of the public sector revolve around the welfare of the citizens, including the provision ofeducation, healthcare, defence, and infrastructure. It is characterized by bureaucratic administration, with decision-making processes subject to governmental regulations and oversight. A prime example is public schools and healthcare systems, which are funded and operated by the government with the primary objective of ensuring universal access to education and healthcare services.

In contrast, the private sector operates on a starkly different paradigm. It is primarily funded by private capital, investment, and profit-seeking activities. Private individuals and corporations own these entities, with ownership shares often represented by stocks. Shareholders invest capital in exchange for ownership stakes and the potential for dividends. The central objective in the private sector is profit maximization, driven by competition in the market. Companies in the private sector are administered by management teams and boards of directors, with decisions guided by market forces. Apple and ExxonMobil are examples of private sector entities, privately owned and publicly traded, with profit motives at their core. Shareholders invest in these companies with the expectation of financial returns.

Lastly, the third sector, often referred to as the nonprofit or voluntary sector, represents a unique economic sphere. It relies on a combination of funding sources, including donations, grants, and earned income, but not taxation. Third sector organizations are not owned by individuals or shareholders; instead, they are governed by boards of directors or trustees. Unlike the private sectors, shares are not applicable in the third sector. These organizations do not seek to distribute profits to owners. The primary objective of the third sector is to serve a social or community purpose, such as addressing societal issues, promoting social change, and providing services that benefit the public. Administration in this sector is overseen by non-profit boards, and it heavily relies on volunteers, philanthropy, and community engagement. For example, the Red Cross operates with the objective of providing humanitarian aid and disaster relief, relying on donations and volunteers to fulfil its mission. Any profits that are made are reinvested into the organisation to further its mission.

In conclusion, the public, private, and third sectors represent diverse economic domains, each with its own funding mechanisms, ownership structures, objectives, and administrative models. These sectors play essential and complementary roles in society, contributing to economic development, public welfare, and social progress. Together, they form the foundation of a balanced and dynamic economic landscape.

Tutor Notes

- I’ve structured this essay with a paragraph on each sector, but you could have done a paragraph on each theme, thus having 5 paragraphs instead of 3. Either approach works.

- You’ve got 5 things and 3 sectors, that equals 15 marks. If you give an example of each and a strong intro and conclusion, that’s full marks.

- See LO 4.1 p. 203 – there’s a cute table with this information on.

How to approach this question

- This question is testing to see if you know the 4 procurement procedures allowed in the Public Sector which are: open, restricted, competitive dialogue, competitive dialogue with negotiation. The Public Sector is limited in how it can procure due to the Public Contract Regulations, so things like Early Supplier Involvement isn’t an option.

- The question doesn’t specifically say it has to be these four, but these are the ones in the book. Because of the vagueness you could say something like running a competition and awarding via a Framework instead. Talking about Public Private Partnerships could also be appropriate but that is outside of the scope of this module (and Level! It comes up in Level 5). These answers would be accepted.

- Also note that it doesn’t say the UK in the question, so if you answered this about your own country, that would be fine.

Example Essay

Each country’s government has its own regulations relating to how goods, services and works can be procured. The UK’s procurement rules is currently dictated by the Public Procurement Regulations 2015 which is based off EU Procurement Directives. This piece of legislation will likely be superseded in Autumn 2023 due to the UK leaving the EU. Until this point, the PCR allows UK public sector organisations to procure in the following ways: open, restricted, competitive dialogue, competitive dialogue with negotiation

Open Procedure: This is the most straightforward and transparent method. A local government issues an open tender for office supplies. Any company that provides these supplies can submit a bid. The government then evaluates all bids based on price, quality, and delivery terms to select the supplier. Any interested supplier can submit a tender. The process is open from the outset, and all submissions are evaluated against pre-defined criteria. This procedure is used when you wish to attract a large number of bidders for the opportunity and is often posted online on a platform such as Find A Tender.com so that suppliers can find the opportunity. If it is a large contract it is a requirement for details to be published on OJEU. The disadvantage of using this approach is that you may receive many bids which can be time-consuming.

Restricted Procedure: In this method, the public sector organization invites suppliers to express their interest. After a preliminary selection process, only those who meet the criteria are invited to submit tenders. This is used when the opportunity is more technical, for example a healthcare authority needs specialized medical equipment. The authority would requests expressions of interest from suppliers. After reviewing these, it invites a shortlist of qualified suppliers to submit detailed bids for further evaluation. The benefit of this approach is that unsuitable suppliers are weeded out early, this saving time.

Competitive Dialogue: This is used for complex contracts where the organization cannot define the technical means or legal or financial make-up of a project in advance. A dialogue with selected bidders is conducted to develop one or more suitable solutions, which are then put out to tender. For example, a local council is planning a new public transport system but is unsure of the best solution. It enters into a dialogue with several firms specializing in transport systems to explore various options before requesting final bids based on the developed solutions. Suppliers can be eliminated through the dialogue process based on pre-determined criteria.

Competitive Dialogue with Negotiation: Similar to competitive dialogue, but with an added phase of negotiation. It's used for particularly complex projects where the needs cannot be met without adaptation of readily available solutions. For example: a government department requires a complex IT system that integrates various existing systems. It engages in a competitive dialogue to develop potential solutions and then negotiates with bidders to refine these solutions before finalizing the contract. This procedure allows for negotiations with the winning bidder to readjust requirements if needed.

The approach taken by a public sector organisation will depend on a number of factors, but in particular the complexity of the project and whether there is a pre-determined scope. Other factors to consider include; the time-sensitiveness of the project and how quickly the procurement exercise needs to be completed, the amount of suppliers in the marketplace, and whether suppliers need to be consulted on to create the specification.

Tutor Notes

- These four procedures are outlined on p.212. Post PCR 2015, these procedures may change, or be renamed, depending on what the UK government decide to do. So if you’re taking this exam in November 2024 or later, note that the study guide is now out of date and you should conduct a bit of your own research.

- You could also mention that the value of spend is a factor when public sector organisations are deciding on a procurement route. For really low value stuff, like they need a new sofa for the office, most organisation's requirements are to get three quotes and compare them. That isn't in the study guide, it's just real life (I've worked in this sector so know thisstuff). Each organisation will have it's own thresholds for what procurement route needs to be taken, so I wouldn't comment on that but generally if it's under £10k there's quite a bit of flexibility. Where you reach 'threshold' then things become very serious and there's much more scrutiny.

- Thresholds are not part of the syllabus so don't worry about learning this. But if you're interested have a read here: New public procurement thresholds from 1 January 2024 - BM Insights - Blake Morgan

How to approach this question

- Remember as you’re preparing an essay plan that this is a case study question, meaning everything has to relate back to Mo and Manufacturer X. So for the 5 areas- think about how this would be applicable for a robotics manufacturer. CIPS don’t expect you to knowanything about robotics so if you talk about KPIs for suppliers- just make them up- as long as they sound right-ish that’s all that matters.

- Areas you could talk about include: competition, ethics, KPIs, quality, supplier appraisal, supplier evaluation, sustainability, transparency

Example Essay

Mo, stepping into the role of Head of Procurement at Manufacturer X during a pivotal period of growth, faces the task of expanding the department and formalizing its policies. In this intricate landscape of a small organization creating bespoke robots, five crucial areas demand Mo's careful consideration in the drafting of departmental policies and manuals: competition, ethics, quality, supplier evaluation, and sustainability.

Firstly, competition. As Manufacturer X navigates growth, Mo must establish transparent guidelines for competitive bidding processes. It is imperative to ensure fairness in supplier selection and implement strategies for cost competitiveness without compromising quality. Encouraging innovation and collaboration with suppliers becomes a strategic approach to gain a competitive edge in the market. Mo should be careful that his policies do not favour any suppliers over others and that consideration is given to allowing SMEs to bid for work.

Secondly, Ethics. Mo needs to develop an explicit code of ethics guiding procurement professionals in their interactions. This should emphasize honesty, integrity, and fair treatment. Additionally, establishing due diligence procedures to ensure suppliers adhere to ethical business practices, especially concerning labour and environmental standards is important. Moreover, whistleblower protection mechanisms should be put in place to encourage the reporting of ethical concerns without fear of reprisal.

Thirdly, Quality considerations. Given the bespoke nature of the robotics industry and the necessity of maintaining high standards for customer satisfaction, Mo must define and communicate stringent quality requirements to suppliers, emphasizing adherence to specifications and standards. The establishment of robust inspection and testing procedures at various stages of the supply chain is crucial, ensuring consistent component quality. Developing contingency plans and protocols for addressing quality issues promptly, including collaboration with suppliers for continuous improvement, should be integrated.

With the organization's growth, a systematic approach to supplier evaluation becomes paramount. Mo needs to develop a comprehensive evaluation framework, including criteria such as financial stability, reliability, and past performance. Implementing a supplier scorecard system is essential for tracking and assessing supplier performance over time. Moreover, fostering strategic relationships with key suppliers to promote collaboration, innovation, and long-term partnerships becomes a strategic imperative.

Lastly, Mo should consider sustainability, in particular environmental awareness and the promotion of sustainable practices into the supply chain for long-term viability. Developing sustainability criteria for supplier selection, considering factors such as environmental impact, social responsibility, and ethical sourcing, is imperative. Encouraging suppliers to adopt environmentally friendly practices and certifications, such as ISO14001 or Fair Trade, becomes crucial. The integration of sustainability goals into procurement key performance indicators (KPIs) is essential for tracking progress and demonstrating the organization's commitment to corporate responsibility.

In conclusion, Mo's strategic focus on competition, ethics, quality, supplier evaluation, and sustainability is pivotal in laying the foundation for a procurement department that not only supports Manufacturer X's growth, but also aligns with its values and industry standards.This approach positions the organization for success in the dynamic landscape of bespoke robot manufacturing.

Tutor Notes

- This question is taken from P. 146 – note the question is on policies not strategy. These are slightly different concepts, but they do overlap. Policies are black and white- we do this and we don’t do that. Strategies are about what the company wants to achieve. They’re future orientated, where as a policy is about what we do now. So a policy may include sustainability, but strategy may talk about reducing pollution.

- CIPS could also ask you to talk about procurement strategies such as achieving cost reductions, environmental issues etc. These are also on p.146