L4M1 Questions Bank

A basic response would include:

- What a Corporate Governance Framework is - the system of rules, practices and processes which directs and controls a company. Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose.

- Impact this has on policies and processes – means the procurement department follows regulatory mechanisms (e.g. financial regulations, Codes of Practices), has a checks and balances system (such as auditing), uses e-procurement technologies, vets staff and suppliers, has a clear segregation of duties etc.

This is a very open question and there are so many correct answers. In fact, it’s quite hard to give a wrong answer to this question – as long as your response explains a policy or process that a procurement department can have that ensures they’re following Corporate Governance – that’s right!

A good response may mention:

- Corporate governance is in essence a ‘toolkit’ that allows an organisation to effectively manage itself, ensuring that it’s policies and procedures are compliant with legislation and are ethical. It also ensures that the company meets its objectives.

- The impact Corporate Governance has on the procurement department will be in mandating the ways in which goods and services are procured and in the general ways of working of the procurement department.

- In your response you should mention 5 (ish) different ways Corporate Governance would impact on how procurement do their job. Examples include:

- Ethical Conduct – corporate governance ensures that the company is operating in a legal and ethical way. This influences the processes Procurement will do and the type of suppliers they will engage with. This may also be in their approach to relationships and negotiations- seeking out collaborative relationships with suppliers rather than looking to exploit them. For example, an organisation that does not have a Corporate Governance structure may look to take advantage of suppliers and achieve the lowest cost possible at the expense of the supply chain and local community. An organisation that has strong Corporate Governance would work with suppliers, developing the relationships and thinking long-term about the impact on the local community. The organisation may therefore prioritisestandards such as Fair Trade over price, and this would be reflected in the way tenders are evaluated by the procurement department.

- Use of Checks and Balance system- Corporate Governance ensures strong financial controls are implemented throughout the organisation. For the procurement department this may result in purchases being made to strict budgets (rather than just spending whatever they want), and business cases being written up and approved before the organisation spends a large amount of money on a single item. Another impact may be in the use of audits. For example, peer reviewing tenders and contract awards to ensue all members of the Procurement Team are following internal processes correctly.

- Anti-fraud prevention mechanisms. An important area of Corporate Governance is ensuring the organisation is free from fraud and corruption. This impacts on Procurement’s policies and processes as it will mean scrutinising tenders and who is being awarded contracts. It may result in high levels of Due Diligence being completed on suppliers before entering into contracts and providing a whistle-blowing service for staff to report issues.

- Security measures- this will be to protect the organisation from risk. It may include the procurement department vetting new staff by completing background checks. It may also involve the segregation of procurement duties so that no individual has too much power. E.g. one person raises the requisition and another person approves the purchase. Security may also be in ways of working such as password protecting documentation and limiting access to confidential information.

- Use of a Purchasing Policy Manual – this provides operational guidance on procurement policies and procedures to all staff members. It may detail things like who has permission to order what, who the Delegated Purchasing Authority (DPA) is and the roles and responsibilities of the team.

An excellent response may also include

- Reasons why Corporate Governance Frameworks impact on procurement policies and practices. This could include reasons of accountability, reputation and risk management, procurement’s links with other departments.

- You could also look at what processes would look like with Corporate Governance compared to without it (with CG = rule driven, autocratic but organisation is protected from risk. Without CG = laissez-faire, everyone does whatever they like, very risky)

- You could also provide further examples, either real life or hypothetical. Investopedia has some great information and examples you could use: Corporate Governance Definition: How It Works (investopedia.com)

How to approach this question

- You do need to know some legislation for public sector here. This may be difficult if you don’t work in the Public Sector. If you’re struggling with this, you could also talk about general legislation that governs all types of organisations such as the Equalities Act and Modern Slavery Act.

- This is also a tough question if you’re not British. CIPS is a UK based organisation and the syllabus therefore only talks about British legislation. If you’re in a different country you could talk about the legislation in your own country, providing the question doesn’t specifically mention UK Law.

- Either way I would recommend knowing a couple of pieces of British Legislation. You don't need to be an expert but just state what they are and what the purpose is should be enough to get you a pass.

Example essay

The public sector, which encompasses various governmental and state-owned enterprises, plays a pivotal role in the governance and provision of essential services. This sector operates under a strict framework of regulations and policies, ensuring that its operations are fair, transparent, and accountable. Among the most critical aspects of these operations is procurement, the process through which the public sector acquires goods, services, and works. This essay will explain key regulations governing the public sector, focusing on the Public Contracts Regulations (PCR) 2015, Late Payment Regulations 2016, Equalities Act2010, and Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, and explores how these regulations impact procurement activities.

The Public Contracts Regulations (PCR) 2015

The PCR 2015 plays a foundational role in public sector procurement in the UK. It sets out the procedures for procuring contracts, aiming to ensure fairness and transparency in the process. The regulations mandate that all procurement processes must be conducted in a manner that prevents discrimination and allows equal access to potential contractors, regardless of their size or location. For example, the open tendering process under PCR 2015 has enabled a more diverse range of companies, including small and medium-sized enterprises, to participate in government contracts, enhancing competition and innovation. The four ‘pillars’ of the PCR are derived from EU Procurement Directives and are: non-discrimination, free movement of goods, equality of treatment and transparency.

Late Payment Regulations 2013

The Late Payment Regulations 2013 address a critical aspect of procurement: the timely payment for goods and services. This regulation ensures that public sector organizations pay their suppliers within a stipulated time frame, significantly impacting the financial stability of these suppliers. For instance, the regulation has been particularly beneficial for small businesses that rely on prompt payments to maintain cash flow. The introduction of these regulations has improved the trust between public sector entities and their suppliers, leading to more efficient procurement processes.

Equalities Act 2010

The Equalities Act 2010 is another crucial piece of legislation impacting public sector procurement. This Act prohibits discrimination in the workplace and in the provision of services, extending its influence to the procurement process. Public sector entities must ensure that their procurement decisions do not discriminate against any group and that they promote equality. For instance, when a public sector organization issues a tender, it must ensure that the selection criteria do not unfairly disadvantage any potential supplier based on irrelevant characteristics. This approach not only fosters a more inclusive procurement environment but also helps to tap into a wider talent and supplier pool, enhancing the quality and effectiveness of public services.

Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012

The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 marks a significant shift in how procurement is approached in the public sector. This Act requires public sector organizations to consider how the services they procure can improve the economic, social, and environmental well-being of their area. This means that when a public sector entity procures goods or services, it must consider factors beyond just the price and quality. For example, a local government might prioritize suppliers who can demonstrate a commitment to environmental sustainability or who offer employment opportunities to local residents. This approach to procurement encourages a more holistic view of value for money, factoring in the wider impact of procurement decisions on society.

Public Accountability and Freedom of Information Requests

In addition to these specific regulations, the concept of public accountability and the mechanism of Freedom of Information requests play a crucial role in the public sector, especially in procurement activities. Public accountability ensures that entities are answerable to the public and their actions are transparent. Freedom of Information requests enable individuals and organizations to access information held by public authorities, which includes details of procurement decisions and contracts. This transparency is critical in ensuring that procurement activities are conducted ethically and responsibly, deterring corruption and mismanagement.

In conclusion, the regulation of the public sector, particularly in the realm of procurement, are complex. Regulations such as the PCR 2015, Late Payment Regulations 2016, Equalities Act 2010, and the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, along with the principles of public accountability and transparency, ensure that procurement activities are conducted in a fair, transparent, and socially responsible manner. These regulations not only safeguard the interests of suppliers, especially smaller businesses, but also ensure that the public sector remains a model of integrity and efficiency and that taxpayers’ money is well spent.

Tutor Notes

- Okay this is important: The PCR 2015 regulations are being rescinded in 2024. They’re based on EU Law and the UK has left the EU. I know we left a while ago now but it’s taken us a long time to address the issue and figure out what we want to do about it. There was also a pandemic that got in the way of people making any decisions in parliament that weren’t to do with Covid. The PCR 2015 will be replaced in late 2024 with new ‘British’ rather than European rules.

- At the time of writing this (December 2023) we don’t 100% know what the new rules are going to look like and if you’re taking this exam from November 2024 onwards, I recommend doing a bit of research into the new regulations.

- Now the complicated bit- the CIPS syllabus is valid from 2024-2028 and doesn’t address that legislation is changing. I therefore don’t really know what they’re going to expect when students are taking this exam and the study guide information is out of date. If you’re not working in the Public Sector, how are you to know the legislation has changed?

- My advice is this- briefly learn PCR 2015- the four pillars in particular, and when the new legislation comes out, have a quick google and see if these pillars are still the same. The regs aren’t going to change THAT much – things like transparency and equal treatment are still going to be really important, but there may be some slight language changes. Plus, if you’re able to mention in an essay that there’s new legislation, it’s going to make you sound super clever.

- LO 4.2 p.211

- This is essentially two mini essays, so you can do them completely separately if you like.

1) Definition of centralised procurement – when an organisation has a designated procurement function which makes purchases on behalf of other teams. When departments need to make a purchase, they would do this by approaching the procurement department who would purchase the item they need. This is in contrast to devolved procurement where departments can make purchases themselves.

2) Explanation: of 2 forms of hybrid structures- there’s a couple in the study guide you can pick from – consortium, shared services, lead buyer and outsourced. In the old syllabus they used to discuss SCAN – Strategically Controlled Action Network and CLAN = Centre Led Action Network. This has been removed from the new syllabus, but I don’t think it would be wrong to use SCAN and CLAN in this essay if you wanted to. However they are more complicated than the others and if you can talk about other models instead I’d definitely go for that.

Example Essay:

Centralized procurement refers to a procurement strategy where an organization consolidates its purchasing activities into a single, central department or unit. Instead of allowing individual departments or divisions within the organization to independently manage their procurement processes, centralized procurement involves the concentration of these activities under a unified structure.

Key features of centralized procurement include:

1) Single Procurement Authority: In a centralized procurement system, there is a designated procurement authority or department responsible for handling all purchasing decisions. This central entity has the authority to negotiate contracts, select suppliers, and make procurement-related decisions on behalf of the entire organization.

2) Streamlined Processes: Centralized procurement aims to standardize and streamline procurement processes across the organization. This can include the establishment of uniform procurement policies, procedures, and documentation to ensure consistency and efficiency.

3) Economies of Scale: By consolidating purchasing power, centralized procurement allows organizations to leverage economies of scale. Bulk purchases, standardized contracts, and negotiations with suppliers on a larger scale can lead to cost savings and more favourable terms.

4) Improved Coordination and Communication: Centralized procurement enhances coordination and communication within the organization. With a centralized structure, there is better visibility into overall procurement activities, allowing for improved collaboration, information sharing, and strategic planning. Moreover, this centralized control helps manage risks, ensure transparency, and monitor adherence to ethical and legal standards.

5) Consolidated Supplier Relationships: Centralized procurement enables the organization to consolidate its relationships with suppliers. This can lead to stronger partnerships, better negotiation positions, and improved collaboration with a select group of suppliers that meet the organization's needs.

6) Strategic Decision-Making: Centralized procurement allows organizations to make strategic decisions at a higher level. This includes aligning procurement strategies with overall organizational goals, optimizing the supply chain, and contributing to broader business objectives.

An example of centralised procurement would be in a hotel chain with several hotels across the UK. In a centralised procurement function there would be one team responsible for ordering everything for all of the hotels, rather than allowing the individual hotels to buy things themselves. Premier Inn is an example of a company that uses this structure- it allows them to buy stock in bulk and ensures that all hotels have the same equipment so customers expectations are always met.

Centralized procurement is often contrasted with decentralized procurement, where individual departments or business units manage their procurement independently (i.e. each hotel would buy their own supplies). The choice between centralized and decentralized procurement depends on various factors, including the size and structure of the organization, the nature of its operations, and the specific goals it aims to achieve through its procurement processes.

Consortium Procurement Model:

The consortium procurement model is characterized by the collaboration of multiple organizations forming a joint group (the consortium) to engage in collective buying activities. Typically composed of entities from the same industry or sector, these organizations unite their resources, expertise, and purchasing power to pursue shared procurement objectives. The consortium leverages this collective strength to negotiate contracts, conduct bulk purchases, and benefit from economies of scale, resulting in cost savings and increased operational efficiency. The UK University sector is an example of Consortium activities- many universities come together to ‘group buy’ items as this brings about many benefits.

The main benefit of this form of hybrid procurement model is the increased negotiating power and leverage derived from combining the purchasing volumes of participating entities. This often results in more favourable terms, competitive prices (through bulk purchases), and improved conditions with suppliers. Additionally, consortium buying allows organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise, fostering a collaborative environment that enhances overall procurement capabilities. By working together, consortium members can collectively address challenges, negotiate strategically, and navigate the procurement landscape more effectively.

However, consortium buying is not without its challenges. A potential disadvantage lies in the complexity of managing a collaborative procurement structure, involving coordinationamong diverse entities. Achieving consensus on procurement strategies, vendor selection, and contract terms may require considerable effort and compromise. Additionally, individual organizational needs and preferences within the consortium may differ, posing challenges in aligning priorities. It is essential to strike a balance between centralized decision-making and accommodating the specific requirements of each consortium member. Furthermore, the success of consortium buying relies heavily on effective communication and trust among participants. Any breakdown in communication or lack of trust could hinder the collaborative process, impacting the overall efficiency and success of the consortium's procurement endeavours.

Overall, while consortium buying offers notable advantages, its effectiveness is contingent on careful management of collaborative dynamics and effective communication strategies.

Shared Services Procurement Model:

In the shared services procurement model, various departments or business units within a single organization converge under a centralized procurement function. Rather than individual units managing their procurement independently, a dedicated shared services centre is established to provide procurement-related services across the organization. This model facilitates streamlined processes, ensures consistency through standardized procedures, and capitalizes on economies of scale.

One key benefit is the potential for cost savings through economies of scale. By centralizing procurement, the organization can negotiate bulk purchases and standardized contracts, leading to better terms and prices. This consolidation of purchasing power enables the organization to optimize its resources and achieve overall cost efficiency. Additionally, centralized procurement allows for streamlined processes, standardized procedures, and better control over procurement activities. It promotes consistency, reduces redundancy, and ensures adherence to organizational policies and compliance requirements.

However, there are also potential disadvantages to centralized procurement. One notable challenge is the potential for reduced flexibility in meeting the unique needs of individual departments or business units within the organization. Centralization may lead to standardized approaches that might not be well-suited for all units, potentially impacting their specific requirements. Furthermore, the centralization of decision-making can result in increased bureaucracy and longer decision-making processes, potentially slowing down procurement activities. Additionally, there may be resistance from decentralized units that are accustomed to managing their procurement independently. Striking a balance between centralized control and accommodating the diverse needs of various units is crucial for the success of centralized procurement.

In conclusion, both the consortium and shared services procurement models represent strategies to enhance efficiency, realize cost savings, and optimize procurement processes. While the consortium model involves collaboration with external entities, the shared services model centralizes procurement functions within a single organization. The choice between these models depends on the unique goals, structure, and requirements of the organizations involved, each offering distinct advantages in the pursuit of effective procurement management.

Tutor Notes:

- This is from LO 3.3 p.161 onwards. There’s quite a bit of information on these hybrid models so there’s many ways it can come up as a question. There are different types of consortium, which I didn’t go into in the above essay because it wasn’t asked for as part ofthe question, but I’d familiarise yourself with this. Also with the pros and cons of each model, and think about when an organisation may choose this type of model.

How to approach this question

- There are three questions within this question. The purpose could be your introduction, and then take two big sections in the main body of your essay for the elements and how to evaluate it.

Example Essay

A Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy serves as a formal commitment by a company to conduct its business in a socially responsible and sustainable manner. The purpose of a CSR policy is to outline the organization's dedication to ethical practices, environmental stewardship, and social contributions. It reflects a company's commitment to going beyond mere profit generation and actively engaging in initiatives that benefit society and the environment.

Elements of a CSR Policy:

1. Ethical Business Practices:

· Clearly articulated principles on fair business dealings, anti-corruption measures, and adherence to ethical standards in all operations.

2. Environmental Sustainability:

· Commitments to minimize environmental impact through sustainable practices, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and responsible sourcing of materials.

3. Social Responsibility:

· Efforts to contribute positively to the community, which may include support for education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, or other social initiatives.

4. Labor Practices:

· Fair and ethical treatment of employees, including non-discrimination, fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' rights.

5. Supply Chain Responsibility:

· A commitment to ensuring that suppliers and partners adhere to similar ethical and CSR standards, promoting responsible practices throughout the entire supply chain.

6. Transparency and Accountability:

· Open disclosure of CSR initiatives, performance, and impacts, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and being accountable for CSR goals.

7. Stakeholder Engagement:

· A pledge to engage with and consider the interests of various stakeholders, including employees, customers, communities, and shareholders, in decision-making processes.

Evaluating a Supplier's CSR Policy:

Assessing a potential supplier's CSR policy involves a comprehensive examination of key factors to ensure alignment with ethical and responsible business practices:

1. Policy Content:

· Review the content of the CSR policy to ensure it covers a broad spectrum of social, environmental, and ethical aspects. A comprehensive policy reflects a commitment to holistic CSR practices.

2. Alignment with Industry Standards:

· Check if the CSR policy aligns with industry-specific standards and best practices. Adherence to recognized standards, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or ISO 26000, indicates a commitment to global CSR norms.

3. Performance Metrics:

· Evaluate whether the supplier includes measurable performance metrics in their CSR policy. Clear objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) demonstrate a commitment to continual improvement and accountability.

4. Stakeholder Engagement:

· Assess how the supplier engages with stakeholders. A robust CSR policy should involve stakeholders in decision-making processes and demonstrate an understanding of their concerns.

5. Supply Chain Responsibility:

· Check if the supplier extends CSR principles to its supply chain. This involves ensuring that suppliers and partners adhere to ethical, environmental, and social standards, contributing to a responsible and sustainable supply chain.

6. Transparency and Reporting:

· Look for transparency in reporting. A supplier that openly communicates about its CSR initiatives, achievements, and challenges indicates a commitment to accountability and transparency.

7. Continuous Improvement:

· Evaluate if the supplier emphasizes a commitment to continuous improvement in its CSR policy. This indicates a dynamic approach to addressing emerging challenges and staying ahead of evolving CSR expectations.

By thoroughly examining these aspects, a buyer can gain insights into a potential supplier's commitment to corporate social responsibility and make informed decisions that align with their own CSR objectives and values.

Tutor Notes

- Students often ask if they can use bullet points in their essays. Many tutors say no, but the answer is actually more nuanced than that. I’ve purposefully written the above in bullet points to show you how it can be done effectively. Bullet points are fine, providing you’re using full sentences and it makes sense as a stylistic choice. It’s not a good option if you’re just going to list things without context. Then it can be hard to follow. I’ve personally used bullet points in essays and done really well. There’s no rule against it. You’ve just got to make sure you’re doing it ‘right’.

- CSR policies are only briefly mentioned in LO 2.4 but it does come up as quite a big topic in other parts of the syllabus so is worth knowing. You could mention some examples of big companies and what their stance on CSR is. A good one to look at is The Body Shop.

- The study guide references Carroll’s Pyramid – this would be great to include in your essay Carroll's CSR Pyramid explained: Theory, Examples and Criticism (toolshero.com) p.112