All QSA_New_V4 Test Inside PCI SSC Questions

Scope of Anti-Malware Requirements

PCI DSS Requirement 5 mandates the use of anti-malware solutions on all in-scope systems unless the system is specifically documented as not being at risk from malware.

Examples of systems not at risk include those using operating systems that do not support anti-malware tools, provided proper justifications and alternative controls are implemented​​.

Assessment Considerations

QSAs must verify and document why a system is considered "not at risk."

Systems storing, processing, or transmitting cardholder data or that could impact the CDE are generally in-scope for anti-malware​​.

Incorrect Options

Option A: While CDE systems and connected systems require protection, the requirement applies specifically to systems at risk from malware.

Option B: Portable electronic storage is not explicitly called out for universal anti-malware but must be controlled in line with overall security policies.

Option C: Systems storing PAN are only a subset of in-scope systems.

Segmentation Defined

PCI DSS v4.0 specifies that effective segmentation separates the CDE from out-of-scope environments, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access to cardholder data​.

Key Requirements for Segmentation

Network traffic between the CDE and out-of-scope networks must be completely prevented. This ensures that out-of-scope systems cannot introduce risks to the CDE.

Methods like firewalls, ACLs (Access Control Lists), and other technologies may be used to enforce segmentation.

Incorrect Options

Monitoring or logging traffic (Options A and B) without preventing access does not achieve segmentation.

Virtual LANs (Option C) alone are insufficient unless properly configured to enforce traffic isolation​​.

Compensating Controls Definition and Purpose

A compensating control is an alternate measure that satisfies the intent of a specific PCI DSS requirement and provides an equivalent level of security.

The rationale and risk mitigation must be explicitly documented using the Compensating Control Worksheet (CCW).

Mandatory Documentation

PCI DSS v4.0 mandates the use of a CCW when implementing compensating controls. This applies regardless of acquirer approvals​​.

The CCW requires detailed documentation including:

Constraints preventing the original requirement from being implemented.

Justification for the compensating control.

Description of the control and evidence of its effectiveness.

Using Existing Requirements

If an existing PCI DSS requirement (e.g., Requirement 5 for antivirus) is already implemented and can mitigate the risks of not meeting another requirement, it may qualify as a compensating control​​.

Approval and Review Process

QSAs must validate the implementation, effectiveness, and appropriateness of compensating controls during the assessment process​

Stateful Inspection

PCI DSS Requirement 1.2 specifies the need for stateful inspection to track the state of active connections. This ensures that only valid responses to communication initiated by trusted networks are allowed.

Invalid or unsolicited response traffic is blocked to prevent exploitation of vulnerabilities​​.

Key Functionality of Stateful Firewalls

Stateful firewalls maintain session information and only allow traffic that matches an existing session or expected response.

Incorrect Options

Option A: Administrative access restrictions are important but unrelated to stateful responses.

Option C: Baseline configurations are a different security control.

Option D: Logging and correlation are for threat detection, not stateful response.