An implementation engineer is requested to create the harmonization field - Magician
This field should come from multiple Twitter Ads data streams, and should follow the below logic:
Using the Harmonization Center, the engineer created a single Pattern for Campaign Name. What other action should the engineer take to meet the requirements?
An implementation engineer has been asked to perform QA for a standard file ingestion, done by the client.
The source file that was ingested can be seen below:
The number of rows added to this data stream is 3. What could have led to this discrepancy?
A client's data consists of three data streams as follows:
Data Stream A:
The data streams should be linked together through a parent-child relationship.
Out of the three data streams, Data Stream C is considered the source of truth for both the dimensions and measurements.
The client would like to have a "Site Revenue" measurement.
This measurement should return the highest revenue value per Site, for example:
For Site Key ‘SK_C_2’, the "Site Revenue" should be $7.00.
When aggregated by date, the "Site Revenue" measurement should return the total sum of the results of all sites.
For example:
For the date 1 Apr 2020, "Site Revenue" should be $11.00 (sum of Site Revenue for Site Keys ‘SK_C_1' ($4.00) and ‘SK_C_2’ ($7.00))
Which options will yield the desired result;
An implementation engineer has been asked to perform a QA for a newly created harmonization field, Color, implemented by a client.
The source file that was ingested can be seen below:
The client performed the below standard mapping:
As a final step, the client had created the field ‘Color’. As can be seen, it is extracted from the Creative Name (after the ‘#’ sign).
For QA purposes, you have queried a pivot table, with the following fields:
* Media Buy Key
* Media Buy Name
* In View Impressions
The final pivot is presented below: