QSBA2024 Exam Dumps : Qlik Sense Business Analyst Certification Exam-2024

For this scenario, using abar chart,scatter plot, andhistogramprovides the best coverage of the requirements. Thebar chartis ideal for comparing the sales performance of the top 10 sales representatives. Thescatter plotis used to analyze the relationship between margin percentage and total sales by product category. Thehistogramis excellent for visualizing the distribution of sales amounts.

Key Concepts:

Bar Chart: Perfect for comparing categorical data, such as sales amounts across different sales representatives.

Scatter Plot: Ideal for exploring relationships between two variables, such as margin percentage and total sales.

Histogram: Provides a clear visualization of the distribution of a continuous variable, such as sales amounts.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Treemap, Container, and Distribution plot: A treemap is less effective for comparing individual sales reps, and a container does not provide a clear visualization on its own.

C. Bar chart, Line chart, and Scatter plot: A line chart is not needed in this case, as it is best for showing trends over time, which is not required here.

D. Treemap, Box plot, and Histogram: A box plot is more suited for showing statistical distributions (e.g., quartiles), which is unnecessary in this case.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Data Exploration: Bar charts, scatter plots, and histograms are among the most commonly recommended visualizations for comparing performance, analyzing relationships, and viewing distributions in Qlik Sense.

Thus, the combination of abar chart,scatter plot, andhistogramoffers the most comprehensive solution, makingAthe correct answer.

The banking dashboard requires several KPIs and visualizations based on current year (CY) and last year (LY) revenue, as well as cost and customer satisfaction. To build the required measures, the fieldsCY Revenue, LY Revenue, and CY Costare necessary because they provide the comparison between the current and previous year, as well as cost-related data for the specific calculations.

Key Concepts:

KPI for CY vs LY Revenue: This requires both CY Revenue and LY Revenue fields.

Scatter Plot for Cost vs Revenue: This comparison requires both CY Revenue and CY Cost to create the necessary relationship in the scatter plot.

Treemap for Customer Satisfaction: In addition to the customer satisfaction rating, the field CY Revenue would likely be used for additional insights by region.

Table with CY Cost: The table requires CY Cost data along with other relevant fields like record number, financial instrument, and bank.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. CY Revenue, LY Revenue, Cost: While this covers the revenue fields, it does not specifically includeCY Cost, which is needed for the table and scatter plot.

C. Revenue and Cost: This option is too general and does not distinguish between current year and last year revenue, which is essential for the KPI.

D. Revenue and CY Cost: This does not include LY Revenue, which is required for the KPI.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Comparison Measures in Qlik Sense: In Qlik Sense, comparisons across time periods like CY and LY require specific fields to calculate accurate insights, and it’s essential to ensure the appropriate fields are included for each visualization.

Thus,Aprovides the correct set of fields for the required dashboard, making it the verified answer.

In Qlik Sense, the'By Dimension'and'Persistent colors'options in the Colors property panel ensure that the same dimension values have the same color across multiple charts. This is especially useful when you have two or more side-by-side charts sharing a common dimension, like customer names in this case. Persistent colors guarantee consistency in color assignment, helping users visually track the same dimension across different visualizations.

Key Concepts:

By Dimension: This option ensures that each unique value of a dimension (e.g., customer name) gets a distinct color across all charts that use this setting.

Persistent Colors: This feature ensures that the colors remain the same between charts, making the visual comparison across charts easier for the users.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Use nested IF statements to set the colors by expression for each dimension value: While this would work, it would be unnecessarily complex to maintain and manage, especially with many dimension values.

B. Define the color values in the master measures and use the color library: This would only apply if the goal was to set colors based on measures, not dimensions. In this case, dimension consistency is required, not measure-based coloring.

D. Use the FieldIndex function to set the colors by expression for each dimension value: This would involve writing complex expressions that would not be as straightforward as using the built-in functionality of 'By Dimension' and 'Persistent colors'.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Color Consistency Across Charts: The 'By Dimension' and 'Persistent colors' settings are recommended in Qlik Sense documentation when creating multi-chart layouts with shared dimensions, ensuring visual coherence across different charts.

ThePersistent colorsandBy Dimensionsettings offer a straightforward and maintainable way to create color associations across charts, making optionCthe verified solution.