QSBA2024 Exam Dumps : Qlik Sense Business Analyst Certification Exam-2024

To meet the requirement of controlling the number of products displayed in the bar chart, the business analyst should use aslider objecttied to a variable. The variable will store the number of products the user wants to display. In theAppearancesection of the bar chart's properties, the analyst can set the number of bars to acustom valueusing the variable, ensuring that the user can dynamically change the number of displayed products.

Key Concepts:

Slider Object: This provides a user-friendly way for users to adjust the number of products displayed in the bar chart.

Custom Bar Limitation: By setting the number of bars displayed to a custom value controlled by the variable, the business analyst ensures that the user can dynamically adjust how many products are shown.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Use the variable to fix the limitation and add an input box: While this could work, sliders provide a better, more intuitive user experience than input boxes for adjusting values dynamically.

C. Use the variable to fix the limitation and add a slider: This is almost correct, but it misses the step of setting the number of bars to a custom value using the variable.

D. Add the slider object and set its value, but without custom bar settings: While adding a slider is correct, not setting the number of bars to custom using the variable means the user wouldn’t be able to dynamically control the number of displayed products.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Dynamic Control with Variables and Sliders: Qlik Sense best practices recommend using sliders and variables to give users control over visualizations, particularly when it comes to dynamically limiting data displayed.

Thus, adding theslider objectand setting the number of bars to acustom valuecontrolled by the variable is the best solution, makingAthe verified answer.

Aline chartis the most appropriate visualization for comparing two continuous measures (Profit and Revenue) over time. Line charts are designed to show trends and patterns over a continuous scale (such as time), making it ideal for this scenario where we need to observe how both Profit and Revenue vary across a period.

Key Concepts:

Continuous Scale: Line charts are specifically suited for continuous data like time, making them the preferred choice when tracking changes over time for multiple measures.

Dual Measure Comparison: A line chart allows you to plot two measures on the same axis, making it easy to compare their trends over the same period.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Bullet chart: A bullet chart is used to compare a single measure against a target, not for tracking two measures over time.

C. Bar chart: Bar charts are better suited for comparing categorical data, not continuous measures over time.

D. Scatter plot: Scatter plots are used to compare relationships between two measures but are not suited for continuous time-based comparisons.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Line Charts for Time Series Data: Line charts are the recommended visualization for comparing multiple measures over time in Qlik Sense, especially when working with continuous data like Profit and Revenue.

Thus, theline chartis the best choice for this scenario, makingAthe correct answer.

In Qlik Sense, the'By Dimension'and'Persistent colors'options in the Colors property panel ensure that the same dimension values have the same color across multiple charts. This is especially useful when you have two or more side-by-side charts sharing a common dimension, like customer names in this case. Persistent colors guarantee consistency in color assignment, helping users visually track the same dimension across different visualizations.

Key Concepts:

By Dimension: This option ensures that each unique value of a dimension (e.g., customer name) gets a distinct color across all charts that use this setting.

Persistent Colors: This feature ensures that the colors remain the same between charts, making the visual comparison across charts easier for the users.

Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Use nested IF statements to set the colors by expression for each dimension value: While this would work, it would be unnecessarily complex to maintain and manage, especially with many dimension values.

B. Define the color values in the master measures and use the color library: This would only apply if the goal was to set colors based on measures, not dimensions. In this case, dimension consistency is required, not measure-based coloring.

D. Use the FieldIndex function to set the colors by expression for each dimension value: This would involve writing complex expressions that would not be as straightforward as using the built-in functionality of 'By Dimension' and 'Persistent colors'.

References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:

Color Consistency Across Charts: The 'By Dimension' and 'Persistent colors' settings are recommended in Qlik Sense documentation when creating multi-chart layouts with shared dimensions, ensuring visual coherence across different charts.

ThePersistent colorsandBy Dimensionsettings offer a straightforward and maintainable way to create color associations across charts, making optionCthe verified solution.