PEGACPSA23V1 Exam Dumps : Certified Pega System Architect

When using decision rules in Pega, ensuring that no potential result is unaddressed is crucial for maintaining the rule's effectiveness. Testing for completeness involves verifying that all possible inputs and conditions have been accounted for in the decision rule. This type of testing ensures that every feasible scenario has a corresponding outcome defined, thereby preventing the decision rule from failing to return a result due to missing conditions.

For the use case where a library application displays a read-only list of outstanding past-due books to staff during the book request case process, the appropriate Data Page configuration needs to ensure the data is accessible and specific to each user session without the possibility of modification.

• D. List, Readonly, Requestor: This configuration is optimal for the described scenario. A 'List' type is suitable because it involves displaying multiple records (outstanding books). 'Readonly' ensures that the data cannot be altered during the process, maintaining the integrity of the information displayed. The 'Requestor' scope is chosen because the information needs to be specific to the user session, providing a personalized reminder for the staff member to notify the member about their past-due books.

Options involving 'Page' (B, C, E) are not suitable as they are designed for single records rather than lists. 'Editable' (B, E) permissions are unnecessary and potentially problematic for this use case since the data should not be modified. 'Node' scope (F) would not provide the user-specific session data needed for this functionality.

For a list report that includes columns for purchase requests and regional cost centers, and with a requirement to show the total number of purchase requests for each regional cost center, the correct approach is to summarize the relevant data in a way that aligns with the manager's needs.

• C. Summarize the purchase requests column by count: This configuration aggregates the purchase requests data, providing a count of purchase requests per cost center. It effectively meets the manager's requirement by offering a clear and concise summary of the total number of purchase requests for each regional cost center, facilitating easy analysis and decision-making.

Using the purchase requests column to group the cost centers (A) might organize the data differently than required, focusing on purchase requests rather than summarizing them by count for each cost center. Filtering the results to include only cost center and purchase requests (B) simplifies the report but does not aggregate the data as