PEGACPSA23V1 Exam Dumps : Certified Pega System Architect

In Pega, when configuring data pages to source UI controls such as drop-down lists, it's crucial to select the configuration that optimally uses memory and efficiently serves the data to the users. For this scenario, the correct answer is Option F: List, ACME-Products-Data-Color, ReadOnly, Node.

• List vs. Page: Choosing 'List' is appropriate because the requirement is to populate a drop-down list with multiple entries (colors in this case). 'Page' would be used for single record data, which is not the case here.
• Object Type: 'ACME-Products-Data-Color' is chosen because the data represents a list of color options provided by the manufacturer, which is typically static reference data, fitting the 'Data' class layer rather than the 'Work' layer which is used for case management or the 'Work-ColorFeedback' which would be used for storing feedback or interactions specific to colors.
• Edit Mode: 'ReadOnly' is the correct mode since users are selecting a color from a pre-defined list and are not expected to edit these values directly.
• Scope: 'Node' is selected to minimize memory usage. By setting the scope to 'Node', the data page is loaded once per node (server instance) and shared across all requestors (users) on that node, which is memory efficient for data that doesn't change often and is applicable across all users, such as a list of colors.

This configuration ensures that the data page is loaded efficiently in a read-only list format at the node level, reducing the overall memory footprint while making the color selections available across the application.

To effectively test a new process for a case type and verify that the UI elements collect the expected results, utilizing scenario testing in Pega is highly recommended. This approach allows for recording a set of interactions and saving the test result, which is crucial for verifying process functionality.

• B. Create a scenario test for the case type: Scenario testing in Pega allows for the simulation of an end-to-end process, including interactions with UI elements. This tool enables the creation and execution of tests that mimic real-world user actions, ensuring that the entire process functions as intended. By creating a scenario test, you can capture and automate the testing of specific pathways through a case type, making it an essential tool for validation.
• C. Add explicit assertions on the UI elements: Assertions are conditions that you expect to be true at a certain point in your test. By adding explicit assertions to the UI elements during scenario testing, you can specify the expected outcomes or states of those elements. This ensures that not only does the process flow correctly, but the UI elements also behave and capture data as intended. Assertions provide a powerful way to validate the functionality and user interface of your application precisely.

Together, these configurations enable a robust testing framework that can simulate user interactions, verify UI behaviors, and ensure the overall functionality of the process and its fields.

In the context of identifying duplicate maintenance requests from the same address in an apartment management application, focusing on key identifiers such as tenant name and apartment address is essential.

• B. Configure the tenant name as a basic condition: Including the tenant name as a basic condition in the duplicate search criteria helps to identify requests coming from the same tenant,