PEGACPSA23V1 Exam Dumps : Certified Pega System Architect

The step name "Investigate Claim" most accurately describes the activity where the customer service agent reviews the details of a fraud complaint. This naming is clear and action-oriented, specifying what the agent is doing (investigating) and the subject of the investigation (the claim). It is preferred over options like "Claim Investigation" or "Investigate Fraud" because it follows the verb-noun format that is recommended for naming steps in Pega, where the verb denotes the action and the noun denotes the object of the action.

An authority matrix in Pega is used to manage complex decision-making processes that depend on various levels of organizational authority:

C. Any overtime -> Manager of Supervisor. This condition involves hierarchical decision-making where approval authority escalates beyond the immediate supervisor, making it appropriate for an authority matrix to define and automate the approval paths based on the organizational structure.

D. Regular 40 hours -> Supervisor of Employee. Although this appears straightforward, using an authority matrix helps in organizations where different supervisors might have varying levels of authority based on departmental rules or other factors, thus standardizing the approval process across diverse units.

For accommodating passengers traveling with service animals, efficiently capturing necessary information (type of animal, size, and medical information) is critical. This requirement is conditional, triggered only when a passenger declares travel with a service animal.

• A. Add a process to the case life cycle for service animal accommodation and apply a condition: This option allows for the integration of a dedicated process within the overall case life cycle specifically for gathering service animal information. The process is conditionally executed, based on whether the passenger has declared the need for service animal accommodation. This ensures that the additional information is requested only when relevant, keeping the case life cycle streamlined and focused.

Applying an optional action (B) offers flexibility but might not guarantee the collection of this information as part of the standard workflow. Configuring a separate stage (C) could unnecessarily segment the case life cycle, especially if service animal accommodation is a conditional step rather than a distinct phase. Creating a child case (D) for service animal accommodation could complicate case management, especially for a requirement that is inherently part of the main travel arrangement process rather than a standalone case.