PC-BA-FBA-20 Exam Dumps : BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis V4.0

To determine the best way to present the changes to the scheduling team, we need to consider the nature of the information being communicated and the audience (the scheduling team). The extract describes changes to processes, roles, and systems, which are best represented visually to ensure clarity and understanding.

Key Considerations:

Business Process Model (BPM):A BPM is a visual representation of the steps in a process. It is particularly useful for communicating changes to workflows, roles, and responsibilities. Since the extract discusses splitting the scheduling team into two groups and introducing new software and processes, a BPM would effectively illustrate how these changes impact the workflow.

Business Activity Model (BAM):A BAM focuses on high-level activities and their logical dependencies, often used in strategic planning. However, it is less detailed than a BPM and may not adequately capture the specific changes to scheduling processes.

POPIT (People, Organization, Process, Information, Technology):POPIT is a framework for analyzing business change across multiple dimensions. While it provides a holistic view, it is not a presentation tool and would not be the best choice for directly communicating the changes to the scheduling team.

Prototype:A prototype is typically used to demonstrate the functionality of a system or software. While the introduction of telephony software and an onlinebooking system could involve prototyping, this option does not address the need to communicate process and role changes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Business Process Model:A BPM is ideal for illustrating the changes to the scheduling process, including the split into inpatient and outpatient teams and the integration of new software. It provides a clear, step-by-step visual representation that the scheduling team can easily understand.Conclusion:This is thebest option.

B. Business Activity Model:While a BAM could provide a high-level overview of the changes, it lacks the detail needed to explain specific process adjustments.Conclusion:This isnot the best option.

C. POPIT:POPIT is a framework for analysis, not a communication tool. It would not effectively convey the changes to the scheduling team.Conclusion:This isnot the best option.

D. Prototype:Prototyping is relevant for demonstrating software functionality but does not address the need to communicate process and role changes.Conclusion:This isnot the best option.

Final Recommendation:

The changes should be presented using aBusiness Process Model, as it effectively communicates the revised workflows and roles to the scheduling team.

To identify the stakeholder groups represented in the scenario, we need to analyze the relationships and roles described:

Stakeholder Groups in the Scenario:

Owner:The two founders of AlpineTrails, who each own 50% of the business, are clearly stakeholders as owners. They have a vested interest in the success of the business and its partnerships.

Partner:WalkNation is described as a partner organization that collaborates with AlpineTrails to offer special holidays for its members. This partnership involves shared responsibilities (marketing and booking by WalkNation, holiday organization by AlpineTrails).

Supplier:AlpineTrails books hotels, transport, and equipment to create bespoke holidays. These entities (hotels, transport providers, equipment suppliers) are suppliers to AlpineTrails and play a critical role in delivering the holidays.

Manager:While managers may exist within AlpineTrails, they are not explicitly mentioned in the scenario. Therefore, this group is not represented.

Competitor:Competitors are not mentioned or implied in the scenario, so this group is not represented.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Owner:The two founders of AlpineTrails are explicitly described as owners.Conclusion:This is arelevant stakeholder group.

B. Partner:WalkNation is explicitly described as a partner.Conclusion:This is arelevant stakeholder group.

C. Supplier:Hotels, transport, and equipment providers are implicitly described as suppliers.Conclusion:This is arelevant stakeholder group.

D. Manager:Managers are not explicitly mentioned in the scenario.Conclusion:This isnot a relevant stakeholder group.

E. Competitor:Competitors are not mentioned or implied in the scenario.Conclusion:This isnot a relevant stakeholder group.

TheRequirements Engineering (RE) Frameworkis a structured approach used by business analysts to define, document, and manage requirements. It consists of five iterative stages:Investigate Situation, Consider Perspectives, Analyze Needs, Evaluate Options, and Define Requirements.

Key Considerations:

Suitability for Waterfall Projects Only:The RE Framework is flexible and can be adapted to both waterfall and Agile methodologies.

Iterative Stages:The framework emphasizes iteration and refinement, making it suitable for evolving requirements.

Defining Requirements:The framework explicitly supports the definition and management of requirements.

Sequential Steps:While the stages are presented in a sequence, they are iterative and not strictly linear.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. It is only suitable for use with waterfall projects:The RE Framework can be applied to both waterfall and Agile projects.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

B. It shows five iterative stages that a business analyst needs to carry out to establish the requirements:This accurately describes the RE Framework's structure and purpose.Conclusion:This iscorrect.

C. Using the Requirements Engineering Framework does not help to define requirements:The framework is specifically designed to define and manage requirements.Conclusion:This isnot correct.

D. It shows steps in the requirements engineering process that a business analyst must follow sequentially:While the stages are presented in a sequence, they are iterative and not strictly sequential.Conclusion:This isnot correct.