OGA-032 Exam Dumps : ArchiMate® 3 Part 2 Exam

This question focuses on modeling the implementation plan for the data center transformation atArchiSurance. The goal is to represent how the different phases of the project contribute to achieving the three stable states, orplateaus, while illustrating the deliverables connected to these plateaus and the physical elements involved.

Key ArchiMate® 3.2 Concepts Applied:

Plateaus:Plateaus representintermediate stable stateswithin an architecture transformation, showing the condition of the architecture at specific moments in time. In this scenario, the plateaus correspond to the stable data center configurations at different phases:

Plateau 1:Only the old data center is in use.

Plateau 2:Both the old and new data centers are in use simultaneously.

Plateau 3:Only the new data center is in use, and the old data center is fully decommissioned.

Physical Elements:These refer to thedata centers,hardware,software, andnetworksthat make up the infrastructure being migrated. These should be clearly depicted in connection with each phase of the transformation program.

Deliverables and Phases:Each phase of the transformation process includes specific deliverables, such as:

Procurement of new hardware and software.

Setting up and testing the new data centers.

Transitioning between the old and new data centers.

Dismantling the old data centerand returning its hardware for refunds.

Work Packages and Dependencies:Work packages represent activities or tasks in ArchiMate® and are connected to the plateaus. These must be modeled with proper sequencing, showing how each phase contributes to reaching the next stable state.

Why Option A is Correct:

Option Aaccurately represents the three plateaus (stable states) and clearly illustrates the deliverables (e.g., the new data center, tested hardware and software, and dismantled old data center) in relation to each phase of the transformation.

The connections between the physical elements (such as the centralized data center, distributed data center, and backup data center) are properly displayed and aligned with the described multi-phase process.

The phases are laid out logically, showing how each phase (e.g., procurement, testing, transition) leads to the next stable state (plateau), following the principles of aplateauandwork packagetransformation in ArchiMate®.

Theflow of deliverablesfrom one plateau to the next is consistent with the need for dependencies (e.g., the new data center cannot be fully active until the hardware and software have been tested in parallel).

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option BandOption Ddo not show the relationships between the phases and the stable states as clearly asOption A. They lack some critical connections or do not accurately represent the progression between plateaus and the physical infrastructure.

Option Cis closer but misses important sequencing in how the work packages (activities) and plateaus interact, leading to an incomplete representation of the transformation.

Conclusion:

Option A provides the most complete and accurate description based on ArchiMate® 3.2 modeling principles. It correctly demonstrates how each phase of the data center transformation contributes to achieving the stable states (plateaus) and ensures that the physical elements, work packages, and deliverables are properly aligned.

This scenario involvesmigration planningfor ArchiCar as it transitions from aproduct-centric approachto anoperational excellence strategyfor mass-producing affordable cars in emerging markets. The task is to model the steps involved, includingwork packages,deliverables, and themotivationsdriving the transitions.

Key ArchiMate® 3.2 Concepts Applied:

Capabilities and Transition Phases:

The existing capabilities—R&D, material sourcing, and engineering—need to be adjusted to fit the new strategy. In particular:

Revising R&D targetsto align with the goal of affordable production.

Revising the procurement strategyto optimize material sourcing.

Introduction of aprocess focusin the second phase to shift from a product-centered approach to operational excellence.

Two transition states are identified:

Plateau 1 (Adjusted Capabilities):Focuses on revising theR&D strategyandprocurement strategy.

Plateau 2 (Shifted Focus):Involves shifting to a process-oriented focus, adjusting material sourcing, and implementing aprocess frameworkto enableend-to-end process thinking.

Work Packages and Deliverables:

Work packagesinclude activities such asrevising R&D strategyandprocurement strategyduring the first transition, and thendeveloping process focusandimplementing a process frameworkin the second transition.

These work packages are linked tokey deliverables:

Plateau 1: Realigning R&D and procurement strategies to achieve adjusted capabilities.

Plateau 2: Implementing a process framework, shifting to process-orientedthinking, and achieving the operational excellence goals.

Motivation Elements:

The migration is driven by a need torealign current capabilities(such as focusing R&D on affordability and optimizing procurement) and a requirement toshift focusfrom product leadership to operational excellence.

The external driver is the competition and market opportunity in emerging markets, where cost is more critical than luxury.

Dependencies and Constraints:

Supplier contracts may impose constraints on how quickly procurement strategies can change, which is considered in the transition planning.

Theprocess frameworkmust be implemented in a way that supportsend-to-end process thinking.

Why Option B is Correct:

Option Baccurately reflects the two transition phases (Plateaus 1 and 2) and shows the appropriate work packages and deliverables in line with the scenario.

It clearly models the steps forrevising R&D strategyandprocurement strategyin the first transition, and the shift to aprocess focusin the second transition.

Theprocess frameworkand its link toend-to-end process thinkingand procurement strategy are also correctly modeled, fulfilling the requirements of the scenario.

Motivationsfor the changes, such as thefocus on the price/quality ratio, and the external drivers for shifting strategy are well captured.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option AandOption Cmisrepresent or omit important relationships between work packages, such as the link between theprocess frameworkand theend-to-end process thinking.

Option Ddoes not correctly capture the sequence of work packages and the logical flow of transitions between phases.

Conclusion:

Option Bprovides the most complete and accurate description of the scenario, correctly illustrating themigration planning,motivations, and thework packagesnecessary to achieve the target state. It aligns well with ArchiMate® 3.2 modeling standards and meets the scenario's requirements.