H12-831_V1.0 Exam Dumps : HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To determine the cost value of the route 10.0.35.0/24 in the routing table of R1, let ' s analyze the possible shortest paths from R1 to R3 (which owns the 10.0.35.0/24 network) based on the given OSPF link costs:

Path 1: R1 → R2 → R3

R1 to R2: Cost = 20

R2 to R3: Cost = 10

Total Cost = 20 + 10 = 30

Path 2: R1 → R4 → R3

R1 to R4: Cost = 10

R4 to R3: Cost = 10

Total Cost = 10 + 10 = 20 ✅ (Lowest cost path)

Path 3: R1 → R5 → R3

R1 to R5: Cost = 10

R5 to R3: Cost = 10

Total Cost = 10 + 10 = 20 ✅ (Equal-cost path)

Final Calculation:

The two best equal-cost paths (R1 → R4 → R3 and R1 → R5 → R3) have a cost of 20.

Since OSPF supports equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing and maximum load-balancing 8 is enabled, OSPF will install both routes into the routing table with the same cost of 20.

The path R1 → R2 → R3 has a higher cost (30) and will not be chosen.

Final Answer: ✅ 20 (Option C)

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the IS-IS Network and IPv6 Route Summary Behavior

IS-IS Areas and Router Roles:

Area 49.0001 (Level-1-2): R1, R2, R4

Area 49.0002 (Level-1-2 & Level-1): R3 (Level-1-2), R5 (Level-1 only)

Effect of ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-2 Command

This command on R1 and R2 summarizes the 2000::/64 prefix for Level-2 routers.

Instead of advertising the detailed 2000::4/128 prefix, R1 and R2 advertise only the summarized 2000::/64 route to other Level-2 routers.

Effect of ipv6 import-route isis level-2 into level-1 Command

This command allows Level-1 routers (like R3) to learn Level-2 routes (like 2000::/64).

R1 and R2 redistribute the 2000::/64 summary route into Level-1 IS-IS areas, making it available to Level-1 routers.

Route Distribution Analysis for Each Router

R4 (Does Not Have 2000::/64) ❌

R4 only advertises its Loopback0 (2000::4/128).

It does not need to install the summarized 2000::/64 route, as it originates from its own loopback.

✅ R4 does NOT have the 2000::/64 route.

R5 (Does Not Have 2000::/64) ❌

R5 is a Level-1-only router in Area 49.0002.

It does not have a Level-2 connection to learn the summarized 2000::/64 route.

Because R5 is Level-1 only, it can only receive routes if a default route is provided, which is not mentioned in the question.

✅ R5 does NOT have the 2000::/64 route.

R3 (Has 2000::/64) ✅

R3 is a Level-1-2 router, meaning it can learn both Level-1 and Level-2 routes.

Since R1 and R2 advertise the summarized 2000::/64 route into Level-2 and R3 has ipv6 import-route isis level-2 into level-1, R3 will install 2000::/64 in its routing table.

✅ R3 has the 2000::/64 route.

R2 (Has 2000::/64) ✅

R2 is a Level-1-2 router and has the ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-2 command enabled.

This means R2 advertises the summarized 2000::/64 route to other Level-2 routers and installs it in its own routing table.

✅ R2 has the 2000::/64 route.

Final Conclusion:

✅ R3 has the route 2000::/64.

✅ R2 has the route 2000::/64.

❌ R4 does NOT have the route 2000::/64.

❌ R5 does NOT have the route 2000::/64.

Thus, the correct answers are: C. R3, D. R2.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the OSPF Network Structure in the Question:

OSPF Areas & Routers:

Area 3: Contains R5 (which has loopback 10.0.5.5/32).

Area 1: Contains R6.

Area 2: Contains R4.

Area 0 (Backbone Area): Contains R1, R2, and R3 (which interconnect the other areas).

ACL 2000 Filtering Rule:

The ACL rule 2000 explicitly denies 10.0.5.5/32 from being imported.

The filter 2000 import command applies this filter to Area 0, preventing routes from Area 3 (including R5 ' s loopback) from being learned by Area 0 routers (R1, R2, and R3).

Route Distribution Analysis:

R5 (Area 3):

R5 has 10.0.5.5/32 configured on its Loopback0.

Since OSPF is enabled, R5 advertises the route to R6 in Area 1.

R6 (Area 1) → R2 (Area 0, Backbone Router):

Without filtering, R6 would normally propagate 10.0.5.5/32 to R2 (since R2 is a backbone router in Area 0).

However, since ACL 2000 is applied in Area 0, R2 blocks this route from being imported.

Therefore, R2 does not learn 10.0.5.5/32.

R2 → R1 and R3 (Both in Area 0):

R2 would typically share any learned routes with R1 and R3 in Area 0.

But since R2 itself does not have 10.0.5.5/32, neither R1 nor R3 can receive it.

Thus, R1 and R3 also do not have 10.0.5.5/32 in their routing tables.

R4 (Area 2) is Unaffected:

Since R4 is in Area 2, it is not directly impacted by the filter applied in Area 0.

It can still receive the route via another path if redistribution is configured properly.

Final Conclusion:

R1, R2, and R3 do not have the 10.0.5.5/32 route due to the filter 2000 import command applied in Area 0.

R4 may still have the route since it is not affected by the filtering in Area 0.

Thus, the correct answer is:

✅ R1, R3, R2 do not have the route 10.0.5.5/32 in their routing tables.